Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T20:57:43.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular gas in the outer disks of galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

Jonathan Braine*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, B18N, allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 33615 Pessac, France email: jonathan.braine@u-bordeaux.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Molecular gas has still only been detected beyond the R25 radius in a few galaxies. Is this due to the low H2 content or to the difficulty of using Carbon Monoxide (CO) to trace H2? Similarly, star formation (SF) decreases sharply in the outer disks of spirals although HI is often plentiful; is the decrease in SF because there is little H2 or because the SF is very inefficient in the outer disk environment?

Existing observations suggest that while outer disk clouds tend to be smaller (steeper mass function), their CO brightness temperature is only slightly lower than in the inner disk, at least when observed with sufficiently high angular resolution. In near-solar metallicity galaxies (Z ⩾ 0.5Zsol), the CO does not become intrinsically difficult to detect when H2 is present, even in the outer disk. While more observations of CO or other means of tracing H2 in the outer disks are necessary, current data tend to show that the SF rate per unit H2 remains approximately constant with galactocentric distance, indicating that the star formation proceeds normally but the transformation of HI into H2 is very slow in the outer disk.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Bigiel, F., Leroy, A., Walter, F. et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2846 Google Scholar
Braine, J. & Herpin, F. 2004, Nature, 432, 369 Google Scholar
Braine, J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Bertoldi, F., & Wilson, C. D. 2007, ApJL, 669, L73 Google Scholar
Braine, J., Gratier, P., Kramer, C., Schuster, K. F., Tabatabaei, F., & Gardan, E. 2010, A&A, 520, 107 Google Scholar
Braine, J., Gratier, P., Contreras, Y., Schuster, K. F., & Brouillet, N. 2012, A&A, 548, A52 Google Scholar
Brand, J. and Wouterloot, J. G. A. 1994, A&AS, 103, 540 Google Scholar
Colombo, D., Hughes, A., Schinnerer, E. et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 3 Google Scholar
Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Verdugo, C., Combes, F., & Pfenniger, D. 1994, A&A, 566, A147 Google Scholar
Digel, S., de Geus, E., & Thaddeus, P. 1994, ApJ, 422, 92 Google Scholar
Druard, C., Braine, J., Schuster, K. F. et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A118 Google Scholar
Rosolowsky, E. 2005, PASP, 117, 1403 Google Scholar
Watson, L. C., Martini, P., Lisenfeld, U., Böker, T., & Schinnerer, E. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1807 Google Scholar