Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T04:32:13.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manifestation of the Jupiter's synodic period in the solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field and geophysical parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

S. N. Samsonov  and
N. G. Skryabin
S. N. Samsonov
Affiliation:
Yu. G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, SB RAS, 677980, Yakutsk, Russia email: s_samsonov@ikfia.ysn.ru
N. G. Skryabin
Affiliation:
Yu. G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, SB RAS, 677980, Yakutsk, Russia email: s_samsonov@ikfia.ysn.ru
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Studying by the authors of paper of solar wind parameters, namely: density, speed and temperature and also a module of interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) intensity has allowed to find out in them fluctuations with the period of 399 days. From references it is known that this period coincidence with the synodic period of Jupiter. So long as close by the given period another source of such fluctuations is not known we have assumed that fluctuations with the period of 399 days are fluctuations with the synodic period of Jupiter. The change of the solar wind plasma parameters and IMF intensity can lead to the change of the Earth's magnetic field parameters and, as a consequence, to the change of charged particle fluxes in the Earth's magnetosphere. On this assumption the IMF intensity in the Earth's vicinity, geomagnetic disturbance (Kp-index) and riometer absorption for the years of 1986-1996 have been analyzed. The analysis of the data has shown the presence of certain changes of these physical parameters with the period of 399 days. When the Earth and Jupiter were found to be on the same magnetic field line, the IMF intensity was decreasing up to 3.0±0.57, the geomagnetic activity and riometer absorption were decreasing up to 5.2±1.46% and 9.4±2.63%, respectively.

Keywords

Sun: activitysolar windsolar system: general
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 5 , Symposium S264: Solar and Stellar Variability: Impact on Earth and Planets , August 2009 , pp. 452 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Ferreira, S. E. S., Potgieter, M. S., Burger, R. A., Heber, B., Fichtner, H., & Lopate, C. 2001, Geophys. Res., 106, 29313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T. W., Carbary, J. F., & Dessler, A. J. 1974, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1, 333Google Scholar
McDonald, F. B. & Trainor, J. H. 1976, in: Gerels, T. (eds.), Jupiter: Studies of the interior, atmosphere, magnetosphere and satellites Tucson: University of Arizona Press, p. 961Google Scholar
Skryabin, N. G., Bezrodnykh, I. P., Plotnikov, I. Ya., & Ivanov, O. P. 2001, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 41, 432Google Scholar
Skryabin, N. G., Timofeev, V. E., Miroshnichenko, L. I., & Samsonov, S.N. 2005, Astronomy Letters, 31, 832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolov, V. D., Samsonov, S. N., Ivanov, O. P., Yarygin, L. S., Vasil'ev, N. I., & Filippovich, V. N. 1988, Observations of artificial celestial bodies (in Russian), 84, 206Google Scholar
OMNIWeb data, http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.govGoogle Scholar
Timofeev, V. E., Miroshnichenko, L. I., Samsonov, S. N., & Skryabin, N. G. 2007, Astronomy Letters, 33, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar