Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:27:45.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A historical overview of galaxy surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2020

Sadanori Okamura
Sadanori Okamura*
Affiliation:
Executive Management Program, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo113-0033Japan email: sadanori.okamura@emp.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Astronomy has changed from data-starving science to data-flooding science about 20 years ago due to advances of observational technology in all the wavelength regimes of electromagnetic waves. This paper gives a historical overview of galaxy surveys. We start from the impact of the technology development. Then, old imaging surveys and redshift surveys based on photography, especially using Schmidt telescopes, in the era of data-starving science are described in some detail. Several features of modern surveys are given and two highlights obtained from the exploitation of modern galaxy surveys are introduced.

Keywords

galaxy surveyhistorySchmidt surveysredshift surveysmodern surveys
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 15 , Symposium S341: Challenges in Panchromatic Modelling with Next Generation Facilities , November 2019 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2020

References

Arimoto, N. 2015, Subaru Telescope, Director’s Report 2009-2013, Presented at the External Review of National Astronomical Observatory, held in 24-26 Feb, 2015Google Scholar
Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., Tarenghi, M., et al. 1984, AJ, 89, 6410.1086/113484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binggeli, B., Sandage, A., Tammann, G. A., et al. 1988, ARAA, 26, 50910.1146/annurev.aa.26.090188.002453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colless, M.et al. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djorgovski, S. G.et al. 2012, in Astronomical Techniques, Software, and Data, H. Bond (ed.) https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1203/1203.5111.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, J. L. E. 1888, Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society, 49, 1Google Scholar
Economist, https://www.economist.com/special-report/2010/02/25/data-data-everywhereGoogle Scholar
Ferrarese, L.et al. 2012, ApJS, 200, 410.1088/0067-0049/200/1/4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geller, M. J., Huchra, J. P., de Lapparent, V., et al. 1987, IAU Symp., 124, 301Google Scholar
Gregory, S. A. & Thompson, L. A. 1978, ApJ, 222, 78410.1086/156198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchra, J., Davis, M., Latham, D., Tonry, J., et al. 1983, ApJS, 52, 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchra, J. P., Vogeley, M. S., Geller, M., et al. 1999, ApJS, 121, 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, S., Wakamatsu, K., Okamura, S., et al. 1986, ApJS, 60, 47510.1086/191094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirshner, R. P., Oemler, A., Jr., Schechter, P. L., Shectman, S. A., et al. 1981, ApJ, 248, L510.1086/183623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARAA, 52, 41510.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, S. J.et al. 1990, MNRAS, 243, 692Google Scholar
Messier, C. 1771, Memoirs of the French Academy of Sciences for 1771, 435-461 http://www.messier.seds.org/Google Scholar
Numazawa, S. & Wakiya, N. 2009, http://skywatch.jp/ngc/Google Scholar
Oguri, M.et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, SP-1, S26-1Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. 1973, AJ, 185, 41310.1086/152431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A. & Tammann, G. 1981, A Revised Shapley-Ames Catalog (RSA), Carnegie Institution of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Shane, C. D. & Wirtanen, C. A. 1954, AJ, 59, 285; 1967, Publ. Lick Obs., 22, Part ICrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinicke, W. 2018, http://www.klima-luft.de/steinicke/ngcic/rev2000/Explan.htmGoogle Scholar
Tonry, J. & Davis, M. 1979, AJ, 84, 1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totsuji, H. & Kihara, T. 1969, PASJ, 21, 221Google Scholar
Useful data centersGoogle Scholar
NED: https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/, SIMBAD: http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/Google Scholar
IVOA: http://www.ivoa.net/, HEASARC: https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Google Scholar
MAST: https://archive.stsci.edu/, DSS: https://archive.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss_formGoogle Scholar
IPAC: https://www.ipac.caltech.edu/, SDSS: https://www.sdss.org/Google Scholar
SMOKA: https://smoka.nao.ac.jp/, DARTS: https://www.darts.isas.jaxa.jp/Google Scholar
Yahil, A., Sandage, A., Tammann, G. A., et al. 1980, ApJ, 242, 44810.1086/158479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, D. G.et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579CrossRefGoogle Scholar