Skip to main content Accessibility help

Airglow and Aurorae from Dome A, Antarctica

  • Geoff Sims (a1), Michael C. B. Ashley (a1), Xiangqun Cui (a2), Jon R. Everett (a1), LongLong Feng (a3) (a4), Xuefei Gong (a2) (a4), Shane Hengst (a1), Zhongwen Hu (a2) (a4), Jon S. Lawrence (a5) (a6), Daniel M. Luong-Van (a1), Anna M. Moore (a7), Reed Riddle (a7), Zhaohui Shang (a4) (a8), John W. V. Storey (a1), Nick Tothill (a9), Tony Travouillon (a7), Lifan Wang (a3) (a4) (a10), Huigen Yang (a4) (a11), Ji Yang (a3), Xu Zhou (a4) (a12) and Zhenxi Zhu (a3) (a4)...


Despite the absence of artificial light pollution at Antarctic plateau sites such as Dome A, other factors such as airglow, aurorae and extended periods of twilight have the potential to adversely affect optical observations. We present a statistical analysis of the airglow and aurorae at Dome A using spectroscopic data from Nigel, an optical/near-IR spectrometer operating in the 300–850 nm range. The median auroral contribution to the B, V and R photometric bands is found to be 22.9, 23.4 and 23.0 mag arcsec−2 respectively. We are also able to quantify the amount of annual dark time available as a function of wavelength; on average twilight ends when the Sun reaches a zenith distance of 102.6°.



Hide All
Moore, al. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7733, 77331S
Sims, al. 2010, Proc. SPIE, 7733, 77334M
Sims, al. 2012, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 124, 637
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed