Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH

  • T. Montecchi (a1) and N. Becattini (a2)

Abstract

The article stems from the main informative gaps of Design for Sustainable Behaviour and discusses the paramount role of a data-driven approach to inform design. The article stresses how quantitative data can address global sustainability, determine behaviours to modify, measure the impact of new learned sustainable behaviours as well as support the definition of behaviour change strategies, widening the spatial and temporal scales to communities and longitudinal studies and reducing unpredictable biases coming from tacit knowledge externalization and interpretation.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Ackoff, R.L. (1989), “From data to wisdom”, Journal of applied systems analysis, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 39.
Altshuller, G. (1984), Creativity as an exact science, Gordon and Breach.
Becattini, N., Cascini, G. and Montagna, F. (2017), “Exploring the Cognitive Dynamics of Product Appreciation”, In: Design Computing and Cognition’16, Springer, Cham, pp. 555573.
Becattini, N. et al. (2019), “Extracting and Analysing Design Process Data from Log Files of ICT Supported Co-Creative Sessions”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 129138. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.16
Bhamra, T., Lilley, D. and Tang, T. (2011), “Design for sustainable behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour”, The Design Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 427445.
Boks, C. (2012), “Design for sustainable behaviour research challenges”, In: Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 328333.
Brundtland, G.H. et al. (1987), Our common future, New York.
Brynjarsdottir, H. et al. (2012, May), “Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 947956.
Coskun, A., Zimmerman, J. and Erbug, C. (2015), “Promoting sustainability through behaviour change: A review”, Design Studies, Vol. 41, pp. 183204.
Cross, N. (2008), Engineering Design Methods Strategies for Product Design Fourth edition, Wiley, Chichester.
Daae, J. and Boks, C. (2015a), “Opportunities and challenges for addressing variations in the use phase with LCA and Design for Sustainable Behaviour”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 148162.
Daae, J. and Boks, C. (2015b), “A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 106, pp. 680689.
Elias, E.W.A. (2011), User-efficient design: Reducing the environmental impact of user behaviour through the design of products [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath].
Fisher, D.H. (2011), “Computing and AI for a Sustainable Future”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 1418.
Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2004), “The situated function–behaviour–structure framework”, Design studies, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 373391.
Giampietro, M. (1994), “Using hierarchy theory to explore the concept of sustainable development”, Futures, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 616625.
Hicks, B.J. et al. (2002), “A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design”, International journal of information management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 263280.
Jiang, H., Kwong, C.K. and Yung, K.L. (2017), “Predicting future importance of product features based on online customer reviews”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 111413.
Kim, H.H.M. et al. (2017), “Data-Driven Design (D3)”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 110301.
Klöckner, C.A., Matthies, E. and Hunecke, M. (2003), “Problems of Operationalizing Habits and Integrating Habits in Normative Decision-Making Models 1”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 396417.
Lilley, D. (2007), Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design [Doctoral dissertation, © Debra Lilley].
Lilley, D. (2009), “Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions”, Design Studies, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 704720.
Lockton, D. et al. (2009, April), “Influencing interaction: development of the design with intent method”, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, p. 5.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N.A. (2013), “Exploring design patterns for sustainable behaviour”, The Design Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 431459.
Montecchi, T., Russo, D. and Liu, Y. (2013), “Searching in Cooperative Patent Classification: Comparison between keyword and concept-based search”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 335345.
Nonaka, I. et al. (1994), “Organizational knowledge creation theory: a first comprehensive test”, International Business Review, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 337351.
Parraguez, P. and Maier, A. (2017), “Data-driven engineering design research: opportunities using open data”, DS 87-7 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 7: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 August 2017, pp. 041050.
Rowley, J. (2007), “The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy”, Journal of information science, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 163180.
Scurati, G.W. et al. (2019, July), “Multisensory nudging: a design intervention for sustainable hand-washing behaviour in public space”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International.
Smith, E.A. (2001), “The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace”, Journal of knowledge Management, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 311321.
Spiegler, I. (2003), “Technology and knowledge: bridging a “generating” gap”, Information & Management, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 533539.
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P. and Verbeek, P.P. (2011), “Design for socially responsible behaviour: a classification of influence based on intended user experience”, Design issues, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 319.
Wever, R. et al. (2010), “Influence of packaging design on littering and waste behaviour”, Packaging Technology and Science, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 239252.
Wilkinson, M.D. et al. (2016), “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship”, Scientific data, Vol. 3
Zhang, L. et al. (2017), “Identification of performance requirements for design of smartphones based on analysis of the collected operating data”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 111418.

Keywords

DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH

  • T. Montecchi (a1) and N. Becattini (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.