Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Using sociometric methods and feeder order to assess social position in early finishing pigs

  • E. Genever (a1), C. R. Webb (a2) and D. M. Broom (a1)

Extract

Competition resulting in high social status and maintenance of that status within farmed pigs may have both welfare and economic consequences. Aggressive behaviours, associated with the establishment and maintenance of a dominance hierarchy, may cause poor welfare and skin damage reducing the value of pigs at slaughter. In order to investigate the impact of social status on welfare we first need to establish the status of individuals relative to their peers. In this paper we compare two alternative indicators of pig rank, namely: (i) aggressive interactions between individuals - the occurrence of aggressive behaviour from pig A to pig B is often assumed to imply social dominance of pig A over pig B; and (ii) the order in which pigs stand at the feeder - an advantage of attaining high social status in many populations is priority of access to food. Social rank of individuals based on observed aggressive behaviour can only be assigned once evidence for a linear or quasi-linear hierarchy has been established (Langbein and Puppe, 2004). In a population with a purely hierarchical structure we expect all triads of individuals to be transitive, that is A→B, B→C implies A→C. For observational studies it is unlikely that interactions between all individuals will be observed. Here we present a novel methodology by which we can assess the linearity of the dominance structure that is not affected by missing or null interactions between individuals. By conducting a census of all types of triad in a social network we can assess whether the subset of interactions observed provide evidence of a linear or quasi-linear hierarchy. Transitive triads provide evidence of linear hierarchy whilst intransitive triads, such as A→B, B→C, C→A, contradict the presence of a linear hierarchy.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Gammell., M.P., de Vries, H., Jennings, DJ., Carlin, CM. and Hayden, TJ. (2003) David’s Score: A More Appropriate Dominance Ranking Method than Clutton-Brock et al.’s Index. Animal Behaviour, 66, 601605.
Langbein, J. and Puppe, B. (2004) Analysing Dominance Relationships by Sociometric Methods - A Plea for a More Standardised and Precise Approach in Farm Animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 87, 293315.
Moody, J. (1998) Matrix methods for calculating the triad census. Social Networks, 20, 291299.
Skvoretz, J. (2004) Advanced Social Network Analysis. http://allserv.ugent.be/∽fagneess/ASNA/ASNAINTRO.htm
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1997) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press

Using sociometric methods and feeder order to assess social position in early finishing pigs

  • E. Genever (a1), C. R. Webb (a2) and D. M. Broom (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed