Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T04:12:27.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between the production of short chain fatty acids and gas when proteins are incubated in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

C. Rymer
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutritional Sciences Research Unit, Alcester Road, Stratford-on-Avon, CV37 9RQ United Kingdom
S. Fakhri
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutritional Sciences Research Unit, Alcester Road, Stratford-on-Avon, CV37 9RQ United Kingdom
A.R. Moss
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutritional Sciences Research Unit, Alcester Road, Stratford-on-Avon, CV37 9RQ United Kingdom
D.I. Givens
Affiliation:
ADAS Nutritional Sciences Research Unit, Alcester Road, Stratford-on-Avon, CV37 9RQ United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The in vitro gas production technique is a means of measuring the dynamics of fermentation. If Wolin (1960) stoichiometry is assumed, and the amount of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) produced during an incubation are measured, the volume of gas produced can be predicted (Blümmel et al., 1997). When carbohydrate rich feeds are incubated, observed and predicted gas volumes are well related (Getachew et al., 1998). Blümmel et al. (1999) also observed a good relationship between observed and predicted gas volumes across a wide range of feeds. However, it was suggested by Cone and van Gelder (1999) that when proteins were incubated in vitro, the relationship was poor, which would suggest that the fermentation of proteins in vitro does not follow Wolin (1960) stoichiometry. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between observed and predicted gas volumes when protein rich feeds were incubated in vitro.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blümmel, M., Aiple, K.-P., Steingaß, H. and Becker, K. (1999). J. Anim. Phys. Anim. Nutr. Google Scholar
Blümmel, M., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. (1997). J. Anim. Phys. Anim. Nutr. 77: 2434.Google Scholar
Cone, J.W. and van Gelder, A.H. (1999) Anim. Fd Sci. Technol. 76: 251264 Google Scholar
Cone, J.W., van Gelder, A.H., Visscher, G.J.W. and Oudshoorn, L. (1996). Anim. Fd Sci. Technol. 61: 113 128.Google Scholar
Getachew, G., Blümmel, M., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. (1998). Anim. Fd Sci. Technol. 72: 261 281.Google Scholar
Wolin, M.J. (1960) J. Dairy Sci. 40:1452 Google Scholar