Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:52:11.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mapping genes for milk and meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

C. S. Haley*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Genetic selection has proved itself to be the most powerful tool available for the improvement of livestock. Over the last 40 years the efficiency of livestock production has been increased radically by the success of animal breeding. Where animal breeders have been successful it has been through the application of relatively simple rules – selection based on traits that can be measured in a repeatable manner and where variation between individuals has both a genetic component and economic relevance. Until recently, this has meant that breeders have focussed on efficiency traits – for example growth rate or milk yield - and in some cases, certain easily measured aspects of quality, such as overall fatness as inferred from ultrasonically measured fat depth. As both the breeding industry and consumers have become more sophisticated, there has been an increasing focus on traits associated with reproduction, welfare and disease and quality. Such traits can be more difficult to improve by selection because heritabilities are low (i.e. only a small amount of variation between animals is genetic in origin, such as for some reproduction and disease associated traits). In addition, such traits may be difficult or expensive to measure (e.g. disease related traits, or quality related traits measured in the laboratory or by sensory panels) and have economic values that are difficult to quantify.

Type
Invited Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchberger, J., Dovc, P. 2000. Lactoprotein genetic variants in cattle and cheese making ability. Food Technology and Biotechnology 38: 9198.Google Scholar
Cockett, N.E., Jackson, S.P., Shay, T.L., Farnir, F., Berghmans, S., Snowder, G.D., Nielsen, D.M., Georges, M. Polar overdominance at the Ovine callipyge locus. Science 273: 236238.Google Scholar
de Koning, D.J., Rattink, A.P., Harlizius, B., Van Arendonk, J.A.M., Brascamp, E.W., Groenen, M.A.M. 2000. Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting. PNAS 97: 79477950.Google Scholar
Duckett, S.K., Snowder, G.D., Cockett, N.E. 2000. Effect of the callipyge gene on muscle growth, calpastatin activity, and tenderness of three muscles across the growth curve. Journal of Animal Science 78: 28362841.Google Scholar
Freking, B.A., Keele, J.W., Shackelford, S.D., Wheeler, T.L., Koohmaraie, M., Nielsen, M.K., Leymaster, K.A. 1999. Evaluation of the ovine callipyge locus: III. Genotypic effects on meat quality traits. J. Animal Science 77: 23362344.Google Scholar
Fujii, J., Otsu, K., Zorzato, F., De Leon, S., Khanna, V.K., Weiler, J.E., O’Brien, P.J., Maclennan, D.H. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science: 253: 44851.Google Scholar
Gerbens, F., Jansen, A., Van Erp, A.J.M., Harders, F., Meuwissen, T.H.E., Rettenberger, G., Veerkamp, J.H., Te Pas, M.F.W. 1998. The adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein locus: characterization and association with intramuscular fat content in pigs. Mammalian Genome 9: 10221026.Google Scholar
Keele, J.W., Shackelford, S.D., Kappes, S.M., Koohmaraie, M., Stone, R.T. 1999. A region on bovine chromosome 15 influences beef longissimus tenderness in steers. Journal of Animal Science 77: 13641371.Google Scholar
Milan, D., Jeon, J.T., Looft, C., Amarger, V., Robic, A., Thelander, M., Rogel-Gaillard, C., Paul, S., Iannuccelli, N., Rask, L., Ronne, H., Lundstrom, K., Reinsch, N., Gellin, J., Kalm, E., Le Roy, P., Chardon, P., Andersson, L. 2000. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science 288: 12481251.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T.H.E. and Goddard, M.E. 1996. The use of marker haplotypes in animal breeding schemes. Genetics Selection Evolution 28: 161176.Google Scholar
Ng-Kwai-Hang, K.F. 1998. Genetic polymorphism of milk proteins: Relationships with production traits, milk composition and technological properties. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78: 131147 Suppl. SGoogle Scholar
Weller, J.I., Kashi, Y. and Soller, M. 1990. Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 25252537.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Boichard, D., Hoeschele, I., Ernst, C., Eggen, A., Murkve, B., Pfister-Genskow, M., Witte, L.A., Grignola, F.E., Uimari, P., Thaller, G., Bishop, M.D. 1998. Mapping quantitative trait loci for milk production and health of dairy cattle in a large outbred pedigree Genetics 149: 19591973.Google Scholar