Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T01:12:58.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual differences in sociability and the trade-offs made by sheep grazing in a patchy environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

A.M. Sibbald
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, United Kingdom
R.J. Hooper
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

In a patchy environment, sheep may have to make trade-offs between being close to companions and grazing the preferred vegetation. It has been demonstrated that individual differences in sociability, measured as the tendency to graze close to others in a group, can predict behaviour in a motivational conflict situation (Sibbald et al, 2000). An experiment was carried out, in which sheep with different sociability indices were compared in a test situation which required single animals to move away from the group in order to graze, but where stress due to physical separation was minimised.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sibbald, A.M., Smart, T.S. and Shellard, L.J.F. 1998. A method for measuring the social behaviour of individuals in a group: an example with sheep. Measuring Behavior ‘98. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research (ed. Noldus, L.P.J.J.), pp 260261, Groningen, The Netherlands. (http://www.noldus.com/events/index.html)Google Scholar
Sibbald, A.M., Smith, D.J.F. and Hooper, R.J. 2000. Individual differences in sociability and their consequences for foraging behaviour in sheep. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, p129.Google Scholar