Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:26:34.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rumen microbial detoxification as a possible explanation for the tolerance of lambs to brassica derived glucosinolates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

A.J. Duncan
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
J.A. Milne
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
Get access

Extract

Although the nutritive value of forage brassicas for lambs has been found to be high, as described by digestibility values of approximately 0.8 or higher, performance of lambs finished on these crops has been low and unpredictable. One of the possible reasons for such low and variable performance is low voluntary food intake which has been attributed to the presence of anti-nutritive factors such as SMCO and glucosinolates in the vegetative material. Glucosinolates undergo enzymic hydrolysis following chewing and the addition of saliva to produce a number of toxic metabolites including isothiocyanates, vinyloxazolidine-thiones and nitriles. (Fenwick et al, 1983). Historically, isothiocyanates were considered to be the major glucosinolate hydrolysis products (Kjaer, 1960); however more recent studies have shown nitriles to predominate under natural conditions such as those occuring during plant autolysis (Cole, 1976). The aim of the present study was to determine whether glucosinolates, following their hydrolysis to nitrile compounds in vivo might be responsible for low intake among lambs offered forage brassicas.

Type
Sheep
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, R.A. 1976. Isothiocyanates, nitriles and thiocyanates as products of autolysis of glucosinolates in Cruciferae. Phytochemistry, 15, 759762.Google Scholar
Fenwick, G.R., Heaney, R.K. and Mullin, W.J. 1983. Glucosinolates and their breakdown produts in food and food plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nut., 18, 123201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjaer, A. 1960. Naturally derived isothiocyanates (mustard oils) and their parent glycosides. Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst., 18, 122.Google Scholar
Van Etten, C.H., Gagne, W.E., Robbins, D.J., Booth, A.N., Daxenbichler, M.E. and Wolff, I.A. 1969. Biological evaluation of crambe seed meals and derived products by rat feeding. Cereal Chemistry, 46, 145155.Google Scholar