Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-15T10:41:51.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tortuous Boundaries and Overlaps: Free Trade and free Speech in International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Tomer Broude
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Holger Hestermeyer
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Poster Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Ballantyne, Davidson and McIntyre v. Canada, Communications Nos. 359/1989 and 385/1989, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/47/D/359/1989 and 385/1989/Rev.l (1993), 1 11.3.

3 ECtHR, News Verlags GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (App. No. 31457/96), Judgment of 11 Jan. 2000.

4 ECtHR, Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland (App. No. 10890/84), Judgment of 28 Mar. 1990, ¶ 55. The parallel is weaker as the court also refers to the term broadcasting that does not appear in the ICCPR.

5 China - Measures Affecting Financial Information Services and Foreign Financial Information Supplier, WT/DS372/1; WT/DS373/1 and WT/DS378/1; the parties reached a mutually agreed solution.

6 China - Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products - Request for Establishment of a Panel by the United States, WT/DS363/5, 11 Oct., 2007.

7 China - Intellectual Property Rights, WT/DS362/R, 26 Jan., 2009. The panel report was not appealed.

8 Lyman Ray Patterson, Copyright in Historical Perspective (1968).