Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:24:30.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introductory Remarks by Sara L. Seck

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Environmental Law Interest Group: Roundtable on Research Methodologies
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Fisher, Elizabeth, Lange, Bettina, Scotford, Eloise & Carlarne, Cinnamon, Maturity and Methodology: Starting a Debate About Environmental Law Scholarship, 21 J. Envtl. L. 213 (2009)Google Scholar.

2 Methods of Human Rights Research (Fons Coomans, Fred Grünfeld & Menno T. Kamminga eds., 2009). See also Crook, John, The International Court of Justice and Human Rights, 1 Nw. J. Int’l Hum. Rts. L. 1 (2004)Google Scholar.

3 See, e.g., Mieville, China, Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law 17, 26-27 (2005)Google Scholar.

4 Mickelson, Karin, South, North, International Environmental Law, and International Environmental Lawyers, 11 Y.B. Int’l Envtl. L. 52, 80 (2000)Google Scholar.

5 Fisher, Lange, Scotford & Carlarne, supra note 1.

6 Jutta Brunneé & Stephen J. Toope, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: an Interac Tional Account (2010).

7 Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords (Edith Brown Weiss & Harold K. Jacobson eds., 1998).

8 Global Administrative Law Research Project, http://iilj.org/GAL/default.asp; Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance, http://iilj.org/research/IndicatorsProject.asp.