Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T14:04:59.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Arbitrators as System-Builders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Stephan W. Schill
Stephan W. Schill*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg); Rechtsanwalt (admitted to the bar in Germany); (New York)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Emerging System of International Arbitration
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 106 , 2012 , pp. 295 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Taylor, Richard P., Order in Pollock’s Chaos, 287 Sci. Am. 116 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 This corresponds to a system theory perspective on the legal system and the position of courts therein. See Niklas Luhmann, Das Recht Der Gesellschaft 320-25 (1988).

3 Cf. Kingsbury, Benedict & Schill, Stephan W., Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality, and the Emerging Global Administrative Law, in 50 Years of the New York Convention, 14 ICCA Congress Series 5 (van den Berg, Albert Jan ed., 2009)Google Scholar.

4 Cf. Stephan W. Schill, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law 321-57 (2009).

5 See, e.g., Romak S.A. v. Uzbekistan, PCA Case No. Aa280, Award, para. 171 (Nov. 26, 2009).

6 See, e.g., Saipem S.p.A. v. Bangladesh, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/07, Award, para. 90 (June 30, 2009).

7 Cf. Chester Brown, A Common Law of International Adjudication (2009).

8 See Berger, Klaus-Peter, The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria (2d ed. 2010)Google Scholar.

9 See Moritz Renner, Zwingendes Transnationales Recht (2011).

10 See von Bogdandy, Armin & Venzke, Ingo, In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and its Democratic Justification, 23 EuR. J. Int’l L. 7 (2012)Google Scholar.

11 See Gus Van Harten, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (2007).

12 Lithgow and Others v. United Kingdom, ECHR Series A No. 102, para. 201 (July 8, 1986).

13 Cf. Judgment No. 2867 of the ILO Administrative Tribunal, ICJ Advisory Opinion, para. 30 (Feb. 1, 2012), at http://www.icj-cij.org.