No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Federalism and International Law: A Third Account
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Power
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1999
References
1 An elaboration of the themes presented here, as well as a specific treatment of the Massachusetts Burma sanctions measure, can be found in Spiro, Peter J., Foreign Relations Federalism, 70 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1223 (1999)Google Scholar; and Spiro, Peter J., The States and International Human Rights, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 567 (1997)Google Scholar.
2 Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968); Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles, 441 U.S. 434 (1979); Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964).
3 See Goldsmith, Jack L., Federal Courts, Foreign Affairs, and Federalism, 83 Va. L. Rev. 1617 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Bradley, Curtis & Goldsmith, Jack L., Customary International Law as Federal Common Law: A Critique of the Modern Position, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 815 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bradley, Curtis A. & Goldsmith, Jack L., Federal Courts and the Incorporation of International Law, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 2260 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 See Koh, Harold Hongju, Is International Law Really State Law?, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1825 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neuman, Gerald L., Sense and Nonsense about Customary International Law: A Response to Professors Bradley and Goldsmith, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 371 (1997)Google Scholar.
4 See Bradley, Curtis A., The Treaty Power and American Federalism, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 390 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 See Henkin, Louis, U.S. Ratification of the Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker, 89 AJIL 341 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Board, 512 U.S. 298 (1994).