Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T00:35:04.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Encouraging Greater Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Opportunities and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Céline Lévesque
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Alternatives to Investor-State Arbitration in a Multipolar World
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 107 , 2013 , pp. 29 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID), The ICSID Caseload—Statistics (Issue 2013-1), https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=ICSIDDocRH&actionVal=CaseLoadStatistics.

2 Trans-Global Petroleum Inc. v. Jordan, Decision on Rule 41(5) Objection, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/25 (May 12, 2008); Brandes Investment Partners LP v. Venezuela, Decision on Rule 41(5) Objection, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/3 (Feb. 2, 2009); Global Trading Resource Corp. & Globex Int’l, Inc. v. Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/11 (Dec. 1, 2010); RSM Production Corp. v. Grenada, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/6 (Dec. 10, 2010); Accession Mezzanine Capital LP & Danubius Kereskedohaz Vagyonkezelo Zrt v. Hungary, Decision on Respondent’s Objection Under Arbitration Rule 41(5), ICSID Case No. ARB/12/3 (Jan. 16, 2013). Not yet public are the following cases: Rafat Ali Rizvi v. Indonesia, Decision Under Rule 41(5) (Apr. 4, 2012); Emmis Int’l Holding B.V., Emmis Radio Operating B.V., MEM Magyar Electronic Media Kereskedelmi Szolgáltató Kft. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/2 (Mar. 11, 2013).