No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
1 App. No. 26083/94, Eur. Ct. H.R., Feb. 18, 1999.
2 See the discussion in Novak, Gregor & Reinisch, August, Desirable Standards for the Design of Administrative Tribunals from the Perspective of Domestic Courts, in The Development and Effectiveness of International Administrative Law 273–300 (Elias, Olufemi ed., forthcoming)Google Scholar. See also Reinisch, August, The Immunity of International Organizations and the Jurisdiction of their Administrative Tribunals, 7 Chinese J. Int’l L. 285–306 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Union de l’Europe Occidentale contre S. M., Cour de cassation de Belgique, Dec. 21, 2009, Arrest No. S.04.0129.F. See also Siedler v. Weu, Brussels Labor Ct. of Appeal, Sept. 17, 2003, 617 Ildc 53 (Be 2003).
4 See, e.g., Geoffrey Robertson, Opinion, at http://www.ilo.org/public/english/staffun/info/bulletín/bl295.htm.
5 Illemassene v. OECD, Cour de cassation, Chambre Sociale, No. de pourvoi 09-41030, Nov. 30, 2010.
6 Judgment No. 2867 of the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization upon a Complaint Filed against the International Fund for Agricultural Development, at http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php7pls3&p2=4&k=ad&case=146&code=fida&p3=4.
7 X v. European Patent Organization, No. 08/00118, Oct. 23, 2009, at http://www.kernkamp.nl/case-law/2009/10/anonymous-v-european-patent-organisation/.
8 See Robertson, supra note 4.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th February 2017 - 24th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.