No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
1 WHO Const, pmbl.
2 Rebecca J. Cook, Bernard M. Dickens & Mahmoud F. Fathalla, Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics and Law 256-59 (2003).
3 Id. at 109-19.
4 See Trial of Ulrich Greifelt and Others, in XIII Law Reports of the War Criminals 1 (UN War Crimes Commission ed., 1949).
5 Maria Momenta Mestanza Chávezv. Peru, Case 12.191, Decision on Admissibility, October 3, 2000, Friendly Settlement of October 14, 2002; see also Center for Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights in the Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, at 3 (Oct. 2002), available at <http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_art_ias.html>.
6 Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research 63 (Jeffrey P. Kahn et al. eds., 1998).
8 See Tavares v. France, App. No. 16593/90 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Dec. 9, 1991) (unpublished decision).
9 See Juan Pablo v. Chile, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., OEA/ser.L/V/2.114, doc. 5 rev., Ch. IIIC1b (2001), available at <http://www.oas.org>.
10 Seijorge Dolir Miranda Cortez v. El Salvador, Case 12.249, Inter-Am. C.H.R. 29, OEA/Ser./L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev., Ch. IIIC2 (2001), available at <http://www.oas.org>.
11 D. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 30240/96, 24 Eur. H.R. Rep. 423 (1997) (Court judgment).
12 Concluding Observation of the Human Rights Committee: Peru, UN Human Rights Committee, 58th Sess., para. 15, UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add. 72 (1996), available at <http://www.unhchr.ch>.
13 Case of Paulina Ramirez v. Mexico, in Center for Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights in the Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, at available at <http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_art_ias.html> (Oct. 2002).
14 Loyaza Tamayo v. Peru, Ser. No. 42, Reparations (Inter-Am. C.H.R. Nov. 27,1998), available at <http://www.oas.org>.
15 See Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment 14, CESCR, UN ESCOR, 22nd Sess., Agenda Item 3, para. 12. UN Doc. E/C 12/2000/4 (2000), available at <http://www.unhchr.ch> [hereinafter General Comment 14].
16 See Thlimmenos v. Greece, App. No. 34369/97, 31 Eur. H.R. Rep. 15 (2001) (Court judgment).
17 General Recommendation 24: Women and Health (Art. 12), CEDAW, UN GAOR 20th Sess., para. 11, 1999, UN Doc.A/54/38/Rev.1 (1999), available at <http://wwwl.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/generl24.htm>.
18 Kinney, Eleanor D., The International Human Right to Health: What Does This Mean for Our Nation and World?, 34 Ind. L. Rev. 1457, 1464-65 (2001)Google Scholar.
19 See Cook et al., supra note 1, at 187-94.
20 General Comment 14, supra note 15, para. 12(a).
21 M.C. v. Bulgaria, App. No. 39272/98 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Dec. 5, 2002) (finding case regarding inhuman Bulgarian rape laws admissible).
22 See Cook et al., supra note 1, at 173-75, 178-79 (discussing a line of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights that decriminalizes same-sex intimacy).
23 For an analysis of concluding observations of international treaty bodies regarding sexual and reproductive rights including child marriage, see Center for Reproductive Rights, Bringing Rights to Bear: An Analysis of the Work of UN Treaty Monitoring Bodieson Reproductive and Sexual Rights (2003), available at <http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_bo_tmb.html>.
24 Human Rights Watch, Ignorance Only: HIV/AIDS, Human Rights and Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Programs in the United States (2002), available at <http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/usa0902/index.htm#topofpage>.
25 See Restoration of the Mexico City Policy, 66 Fed. Reg. 17,303 (Mar. 28, 2001).
26 Compare id. with Ctr. for Reprod. Law & Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002) (parenthetical).
28 Open Door Counseling Ltd. v. Ireland, App. Nos. 14234/88, 14253/88, 15 Eur. H.R. Rep. 244 (1992) (Court judgment).
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
No CrossRef data available.