Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T20:43:15.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Rights Dimensions of Health Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Rebecca J. Cook
Rebecca J. Cook*
Affiliation:
International Human Rights, University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Human Security: Can It Be Attained?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 97 , 2003 , pp. 101 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 WHO Const, pmbl.

2 Rebecca J. Cook, Bernard M. Dickens & Mahmoud F. Fathalla, Reproductive Health and Human Rights: Integrating Medicine, Ethics and Law 256-59 (2003).

3 Id. at 109-19.

4 See Trial of Ulrich Greifelt and Others, in XIII Law Reports of the War Criminals 1 (UN War Crimes Commission ed., 1949).

5 Maria Momenta Mestanza Chávezv. Peru, Case 12.191, Decision on Admissibility, October 3, 2000, Friendly Settlement of October 14, 2002; see also Center for Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights in the Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, at 3 (Oct. 2002), available at <http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_art_ias.html>.

6 Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research 63 (Jeffrey P. Kahn et al. eds., 1998).

7 Id.

8 See Tavares v. France, App. No. 16593/90 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Dec. 9, 1991) (unpublished decision).

9 See Juan Pablo v. Chile, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., OEA/ser.L/V/2.114, doc. 5 rev., Ch. IIIC1b (2001), available at <http://www.oas.org>.

10 Seijorge Dolir Miranda Cortez v. El Salvador, Case 12.249, Inter-Am. C.H.R. 29, OEA/Ser./L/V/II.111, doc. 20 rev., Ch. IIIC2 (2001), available at <http://www.oas.org>.

11 D. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 30240/96, 24 Eur. H.R. Rep. 423 (1997) (Court judgment).

12 Concluding Observation of the Human Rights Committee: Peru, UN Human Rights Committee, 58th Sess., para. 15, UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add. 72 (1996), available at <http://www.unhchr.ch>.

13 Case of Paulina Ramirez v. Mexico, in Center for Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights in the Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, at available at <http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_art_ias.html> (Oct. 2002).

14 Loyaza Tamayo v. Peru, Ser. No. 42, Reparations (Inter-Am. C.H.R. Nov. 27,1998), available at <http://www.oas.org>.

15 See Substantive Issues Arising in the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: General Comment 14, CESCR, UN ESCOR, 22nd Sess., Agenda Item 3, para. 12. UN Doc. E/C 12/2000/4 (2000), available at <http://www.unhchr.ch> [hereinafter General Comment 14].

16 See Thlimmenos v. Greece, App. No. 34369/97, 31 Eur. H.R. Rep. 15 (2001) (Court judgment).

17 General Recommendation 24: Women and Health (Art. 12), CEDAW, UN GAOR 20th Sess., para. 11, 1999, UN Doc.A/54/38/Rev.1 (1999), available at <http://wwwl.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/generl24.htm>.

18 Kinney, Eleanor D., The International Human Right to Health: What Does This Mean for Our Nation and World?, 34 Ind. L. Rev. 1457, 1464-65 (2001)Google Scholar.

19 See Cook et al., supra note 1, at 187-94.

20 General Comment 14, supra note 15, para. 12(a).

21 M.C. v. Bulgaria, App. No. 39272/98 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Dec. 5, 2002) (finding case regarding inhuman Bulgarian rape laws admissible).

22 See Cook et al., supra note 1, at 173-75, 178-79 (discussing a line of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights that decriminalizes same-sex intimacy).

23 For an analysis of concluding observations of international treaty bodies regarding sexual and reproductive rights including child marriage, see Center for Reproductive Rights, Bringing Rights to Bear: An Analysis of the Work of UN Treaty Monitoring Bodieson Reproductive and Sexual Rights (2003), available at <http://www.reproductiverights.org/pub_bo_tmb.html>.

24 Human Rights Watch, Ignorance Only: HIV/AIDS, Human Rights and Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Programs in the United States (2002), available at <http://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/usa0902/index.htm#topofpage>.

25 See Restoration of the Mexico City Policy, 66 Fed. Reg. 17,303 (Mar. 28, 2001).

26 Compare id. with Ctr. for Reprod. Law & Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002) (parenthetical).

27 See Cook, Rebecca J. & Dickens, Bernard M., Human Rights Dynamics of Abortion Law Reform, 25 Hum. Rts. Q. 159 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Open Door Counseling Ltd. v. Ireland, App. Nos. 14234/88, 14253/88, 15 Eur. H.R. Rep. 244 (1992) (Court judgment).