Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T00:11:45.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Future of Transnational Judicial Dialogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Melissa A. Waters*
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Transnational Legal Dialogue, a Human Rights-Based Hierarchy, and the Creation of Norms
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A Typology of Transjudicial Communication, 29 U. Rich. L. Rev. 99, 99 (1994)Google Scholar.

2 See Waters, Melissa A., Mediating Norms and Identity: The Role of Transnational Judicial Dialogue in Creating and Enforcing International Law, 93 Geo. L.J. 487 (2005)Google Scholar.

3 161 ECHR (ser. A) (1989).

4 Pratt v. Attorney-General for Jamaica, [1994] 2 A.C. 1 (P.C. 1993).

5 Catholic Comm’n for Justice & Peace in Zimbabwe v. Attorney Gen., [1993] 1 Z.L.R. 239.

6 State v. Makwanyane, 1995 (3) SALR 391 (CC) (S. Afr.).

7 Kindler v. Canada, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 779 (Can.).

8 Id. at 801.

9 United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283 (Can.).

10 Id.

11 Id. at 324 (quoting Makwanyane, supra note 6, at 431).

12 Id. at 312.

13 See Waters, Melissa A., Creeping Monism: The Judicial Trend Toward Interpretive Incorporation of Human Rights Treaties, 107 Colum. L. Rev. 628 (2007)Google Scholar.

14 543 U.S. 551 (2005).

15 See cases discussed in Waters, supra note 13, at 683-86 (discussing use of constitutional Charming Betsy canon worldwide).

16 See id.