Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T17:01:14.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Most-Favored-Nation Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

William S. Culbertson*
Affiliation:
District of Columbia Bar

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Second Session
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of U. S. Tariff Commission, 1918 (Washington, 1919), p. 15.

2 Equality of Treatment in the Present State of International Commercial Relations, League of Nations Document No. C.379.M.250.1936.II.B., p. 25.

3 Resolution V: Economic, Commercial, and Tariff Policy. 7th Int. Conf. American States, 1933, Final Act, p. 23.

4 Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. XXII, p. 183, note.

5 Ibid., p. 156.

1 299 U. S. 304,57 S. Ct. 216 (1936); Am. Jour. Int. Law, Vol. 31 (1937), p. 334.

2 299 U. S. 304, 312, 57 S. Ct. 217.

3 299 U. S. 304, 307, 57 S. Ct. 218.

4 299 U. S. 304, 321, 57 S. Ct. 221.

5 299 U. S. 304, 315, 57 S. Ct. 216, 218–219 (1936).

6 239 U. S. 299, 311 (1915).

7 48 Stat. 943, Sec. 350 (a).

8 Sec. 350 (a).

9 143 U. S. 649 (1892).

10 42 Stat. 858, 941.

11 276 U. S. 394, 404 (1928).

12 Id. at 409.

13 Sec. 350 (a).