Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:13:26.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supporting a curriculum for delivering Type 2 diabetes patient self-management education: a patient-needs assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Jackie Sturt
Affiliation:
Warwick Diabetes Care, Centre for Primary Health Care Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK
Hilary Hearnshaw
Affiliation:
Warwick Diabetes Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, UK
Julie Barlow
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Health, Coventry University, Coventry, England, UK
Jenny Hainsworth
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Health, Coventry University, Coventry, England, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline for diabetes patient education offers little to inform National Health Services (NHS) Trusts in the curriculum design of self-management education programmes. The study aim was to conduct a patient-needs assessment of the educational curriculum content and support needs for Type 2 diabetes self-management. Different stages of the condition were chosen to identify whether needs remained constant or changed with time and experience. Six focus groups were convened for people who had recently received a new diagnosis or changed therapy. Twenty-three participants were recruited from primary care and the media in the UK. The educational curriculum support needs comprised: access to care and support, continuity of health care professional, lay support, high-quality care and support, and a positive cognitive appraisal of experiences. Needs were broadly similar irrespective of the new change situation. The current emphasis on lay support concurs with a proportion of the needs of our study participants. Motivational communications with patients need to be prioritized to enable patients to address therapeutic goals.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2005 Arnold