Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T05:34:52.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Primary care research networks: perspectives, research interests and training needs of members

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Greta Rait
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
Stephen Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
Paul Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Primary care research networks are considered to be fundamental to the development of a relevant research base in primary care. Networks must be responsive to members' research and training needs in order to evolve. The aims were to gather information about the perspectives, barriers to participation, research interests and training needs of primary care staff interested in participating in the North Central Thames Primary Care Research Network (NoCTeN). A postal questionnaire survey documented training needs and barriers to initiating or developing practice-based research. Focus groups were convened to gain an understanding of needs and explore practical means of addressing these needs. Seventy per cent of practices (57/82) responded to the questionnaire survey. Two focus groups were convened with general practitioners, and one group with practice nurses. Clinical commitments were considered the greatest barrier to research participation. Respondents were keen to participate in research relevant to their practice population. Training was viewed as ideally being project specific and practice based. Mentoring schemes were advocated, together with methods to encourage primary care staff to develop research ideas and access appropriate training. Although there were common themes, there were also differences between general practitioners' and nurses' perceived needs. Investigation of members' perspectives and needs enables networks to respond appropriately and practically. Addressing barriers should encourage members to participate in research and increase primary care-based research activity.

Type
Networking
Copyright
2002 Arnold