Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The present status and future role of family doctors: a perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks

  • Waris Qidwai (a1), John W. Beasley (a2) and Francisco J. Gomez-Clavelina (a3)

Abstract

Background

Health care systems are changing around the world; family doctors need to adapt and prepare for future challenges.

Aim

To consider the present status of family doctors, anticipated changes in health care systems, the challenges these will bring and possible solutions.

Collection of information

Collaborative enquiry amongst members of the International Federation for Primary Care Research Networks (IFPCRN). Six strategic questions were addressed by 37 contributors from 23 countries. Responses were collated and contributors invited to further comment on the interim report.

Findings

Present status: Despite wide variability, common problems relate to delivery systems, funding and policy, lack of evidence-based medical practice, education and research. Role of family doctors: There is wide variability in roles and often poor interaction with other caregivers. Anticipated changes: An expansion of the family physician model is anticipated, alongside shortages of family doctors in the face of increased health care needs, increased complexity of problems and the shift to ambulatory care. Advances in information technology may be useful. Anticipated challenges and proposed actions: Address quality issues. This requires audit and quality assurance, promoting adaptability, promoting group practices and teamwork, coordinating care, incorporating information technology and ensuring ethical relationships with industry. Improve education and continuing professional development: Improved education and continuing professional development are needed, as are measures to prevent burnout and retain the workforce. Develop a robust research enterprise: Research in primary care is needed to develop relevant guidelines. Improve support for family doctors: Providing excellent patient care is essential for improved status and support. Achieving this requires engagement with policy makers, academic institutions and the public.

Conclusions

While there is great variability across different countries, common themes relate to present status, anticipated changes in health systems and the responses needed from family medicine.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The present status and future role of family doctors: a perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The present status and future role of family doctors: a perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The present status and future role of family doctors: a perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Waris Qidwai, Department of Family Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, PO Box: 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan. Email: waris.qidwai@aku.edu

References

Hide All
Abyad, A. 1996: Family medicine in the Middle East: reflections on the experiences of several countries. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 9, 289297.
Abyad, A., Al-Baho, A.K., Unluoglu, I., Tarawneh, M.Al Hilfy, T.K. 2007: Development of family medicine in the Middle East. Family Medicine 39, 734741.
Anderson, G.F.Chu, E. 2007: Expanding priorities – confronting chronic disease in countries with low income. New England Journal of Medicine 356, 209215.
Beasley, J.W., Hankey, T.H., Erickson, R., Stange, K.C., Mundt, M., Elliott, M. et al. 2004: How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? AWReN study. Annals of Family Medicine 2, 405410.
Beasley, J.W., Starfield, B., van Weel, C., Rosser, W.Haq, C.L. 2007: Global health and primary care research. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 20, 518526.
Berenson, R.A. 2005: Which way for competition? None of the above. Health Affairs 24, 15361542.
Bindman, A.B.Majeed, A. 2003: Organization of primary care in the United States. British Medical Journal 326, 631.
Biscaia, A., Martins, J., Carreira, M., Fronteira, I., Antunes, A.Ferrinho, P. 2006: Cuidados de Saúde Primários em Portugal – Reformar para Novos Sucessos (Grande Prémio Fundação AstraZeneca 2005). Lisboa: Padrões Culturais Editora.
Bodenheimer, T.Grumbach, K. 2003: Electronic technology. A spark to revitalize primary care? Journal of the American Medical Association 290, 259264.
Branco, A.Ramos, V. 2001: Cuidados de saúde primários em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa S Pública 512.
Ministério da Saúde, Brasil. 2002: O Programa Saúde da Família e a Atenção Básica no Brasil. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/psf_atencaobasica.pdf
Bray, J., Lee, J.A., Smith, L.Lyle, Y. 2000: Collaborative inquiry in practice. Action, reflection and making meaning. New York: Sage Publications.
Buchan, J.Dal Poz, M. 2002: Skill mix in the health care workforce: reviewing the evidence. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 80, 575580.
Choo, V. 2003: Philippines losing its nurses, and now maybe its doctors. Lancet 361, 1356.
Cohen, M., Ferrier, B., Woodward, C.A.Brown, J. 2001: Health care system reform. Ontario family physician’s reactions. Canadian Family Physician 47, 17771784.
College of Family Physicians of Canada. 2004: Family Medicine in Canada: vision for the future. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from http://www.cfpc.ca/English/cfpc/communications/health%20policy/Published%20Reports/default.asp?s=1
Donaldson, M., Yordy, K.Lohr, K. 1996: Primary Care America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ebell, M.H.Frame, P. 2001: What can technology do to, and for, family medicine? Family Medicine 33, 311319.
Fatmi, Z., Gulzar, A.Z.Kazi, A. 2005: Maternal and newborn care: practices and beliefs of traditional birth attendants in Sindh, Pakistan. East Mediterranean Health Journal 11, 225234.
Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja. 2003: Technical report 2003, National HIV Sero-prevalence Sentinel Survey. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Health.
Global Family Doctor. 2006: Website for world family doctors. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from www.globalfamilydoctor.com
Grande, G.E., Farquhar, M.C., Barclay, S.I.Todd, C.J. 2004: Valued aspects of primary palliative care: content analysis of bereaved carers’ descriptions. British Journal of General Practice 54, 772778.
Heinzelmann, P.J., Lugn, N.E.Kvedar, J.C. 2005: Telemedicine in the future. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11, 384390.
Hiramanek, N.McAvoy, B.R. 2005: Meeting the needs of patients with cancer – a GP guide to support services. Australian Family Physician 34, 365367.
Iversen, L., Farmer, J.C.Hannaford, P.C. 2002: Workload pressures in rural general practice: a qualitative investigation. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 20, 139144.
Karkee, S.B., Tamang, A.L., Gurung, Y.B., Mishra, G., Banez-Ockelford, J., Saunders, P. et al. 2005: Improving access to drugs by poor households through a cost sharing drug scheme: a wealth ranking approach. Nepal Medical College Journal 7, 2631.
Lionis, C., Tsiraki, M., Bardis, B.Philalithis, A. 2004: Seeking quality improvement in primary care in Crete, Greece: the first actions. Croatian Medical Journal 45, 599603.
Mackean, P.Gutkin, C. 2003: Fewer medial students selecting family medicine. Can family practice survive? Canadian Family Physician 49, 408409.
Magee, R. 2002: Quacks: fakers and charlatans in medicine. Pharmacy History Australia 3, 911.
Malik, I.A.Gopalan, S. 2003: Use of CAM results in delay in seeking medical advice for breast cancer. European Journal of Epidemiology 18, 817823.
Martin, J.C., Avant, R.F., Bowman, M.A., Bucholtz, J.R., Dickinson, J.R., Evans, K.L. et al. 2004: The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Annals of Family Medicine 2, (Suppl), S3S32.
McGlynn, E.A., Asch, S.M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A. et al. 2003: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 348, 26352645.
Mental Health Ordinance for Pakistan. 2001: [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from http://www.emro.who.int/MNH/WHD/Pakistan-Ordinance.pdf
Munro, J.C., Lewis, J.Lam, C.L.K. 1991: A survey of the referral patterns in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Practitioner 13, 16091620.
National Physician Survey. 2004: Initial data release of the 2004 National Physician Survey. A collaborative project of The College of Family Physicians of Canada, The Canadian Medical Association, and The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from URL:http://www.cfpc.ca/nps/English/pdf/Research_&_Reports/Archived/Initial_Data_Release_2004_NPS_Oct04_Updated_Nov.pdf
National Program of Health Sector Reform and Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2005–2010. 2004: Approved by Edict of President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. No. 1438.
Ness, J., Cirillo, D.J., Weir, D.R., Nisly, N.L.Wallace, R.B. 2005: Use of complementary medicine in older Americans: results from the Health and Retirement Study. Gerontologist 45, 516524.
Nugmanova, D.S. 2002: PHC development. Health reforms lessons learned. Primary Health Care Conference, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, January 30–31.
Nugmanova, D.S. 2003: Clinical practice guidelines in Kazakhstan: first steps towards development and implementation. Information Bulletin for Health Professionals in Central Asia, ZdravPlus/USAID newsletter “Time to Be Healthy”. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from http://www.zplus.kz/
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001: Policy brief. OECD health at a glance – how Canada compares. OECD Observer. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/25/2465559.pdf
Qidwai, W.Maqbool, M. 2005: Patient referral patterns at a family practice centre in Karachi. Medicine Today 3, 3437.
Ransome Kuti, O., Sorungbe, A.O.O., Oyegbite, K.S.Bamisaiye, A. 1988: Strengthening primary health care at local government level. The Nigerian experience. Lagos, Nigeria: Academy Press, Ltd.
Safdar, S., Inam, S.N., Omair, A.Ahmed, S.T. 2002: Maternal health care in a rural area of Pakistan. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 52, 308311.
Souliotis, K.Lionis, C. 2004: Creating an integrated health care system in Greece: a primary care perspective. Journal of Medical System 28, 643652.
Sox, H.C. 2003: The future of primary care. Annals of Internal Medicine 4, 230232.
Starfield, B. 1991: Primary care and health: a cross-national comparison. Journal of the American Medical Association 266, 23682371.
Stein, A.T., Costa, M., Busnello, E.D.Rodrigues, L.C. 1999: Who in Brazil has a personal doctor? Family Practice 16, 596599.
Tanı ve Tedavi Rehberi. 2003: Guideline of diagnosis and treatment. Ankara: Ministry of Health.
The Harvard Team. 1999: Improving Hong Kong’s Health Care System: Why and for Whom? Hong Kong SAR: Government Printing Department. The Harvard Team.
Thomas, K.J., Nicholl, J.P.Fall, M. 2001: Access to complementary medicine via general practice. British Journal of General Practice 51, 2530.
Thomas, S., Okorafor, O.A.Mbatsha, S. 2005: Barriers to the equitable funding of primary healthcare in South Africa. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 4, 183190.
Towse, A., Mills, A.Tangcharoensathien, V. 2004: Learning from Thailand’s health reforms. British Medical Journal 328, 103105.
Weel, C.V.Rosser, W.W. 2004: Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Annals of Family Medicine (Suppl 2), S5S16.
World Bank. 1993: World development report. Investing in health. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Health Organization. 2006: World health report 2006. [Online] Retrieved 7 May 2008 from http://www.who.int/whr/2006/annex/06_annex1_en.pdf
Woolf, S.H. 2007: Potential health and economic consequences of misplaced priorities. Journal of the American Medical Association 297, 523526.
Yaman, H. 2002a: Training in family medicine: need for changes? [Letter]. European Journal of General Practice 8, 120121.
Yaman, H. 2002b: Continuing medical education in Turkey: efforts of the Turkish Medical Association. BMC Medical Education 2, 6.
Yaman, H.Ungan, M. 2002: Burnout in young doctors [in Turkish]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 17, 3744.
Yaris, F. and Dikici, M.F. 2004: Why medical students prefer other specialties rather than family medicine? Poster presented at the 17th WONCA World Conference of Family Doctors, Orlando, Florida, USA, October 13–17.

Keywords

The present status and future role of family doctors: a perspective from the International Federation of Primary Care Research Networks

  • Waris Qidwai (a1), John W. Beasley (a2) and Francisco J. Gomez-Clavelina (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed