Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations

  • Marjorie C. Weiss (a1), Jo Platt (a2), Ruth Riley (a3), Betty Chewning (a4), Gordon Taylor (a5), Susan Horrocks (a6) and Andrea Taylor (a7)...

Abstract

Aim

The aims of this study were twofold: (a) to explore whether specific components of shared decision making were present in consultations involving nurse prescribers (NPs), pharmacist prescribers (PPs) and general practitioners (GPs) and (b) to relate these to self-reported patient outcomes including satisfaction, adherence and patient perceptions of practitioner empathy.

Background

There are a range of ways for defining and measuring the process of concordance, or shared decision making as it relates to decisions about medicines. As a result, demonstrating a convincing link between shared decision making and patient benefit is challenging. In the United Kingdom, nurses and pharmacists can now take on a prescribing role, engaging in shared decision making. Given the different professional backgrounds of GPs, NPs and PPs, this study sought to explore the process of shared decision making across these three prescriber groups.

Methods

Analysis of audio-recordings of consultations in primary care in South England between patients and GPs, NPs and PPs. Analysis of patient questionnaires completed post consultation.

Findings

A total of 532 consultations were audio-recorded with 20 GPs, 19 NPs and 12 PPs. Prescribing decisions occurred in 421 (79%). Patients were given treatment options in 21% (102/482) of decisions, the prescriber elicited the patient’s treatment preference in 18% (88/482) and the patient expressed a treatment preference in 24% (118/482) of decisions. PPs were more likely to ask for the patient’s preference about their treatment regimen (χ 2=6.6, P=0.036, Cramer’s V=0.12) than either NPs or GPs. Of the 275 patient questionnaires, 192(70%) could be matched with a prescribing decision. NP patients had higher satisfaction levels than patients of GPs or PPs. More time describing treatment options was associated with increased satisfaction, adherence and greater perceived practitioner empathy. While defining, measuring and enabling the process of shared decision making remains challenging, it may have patient benefit.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Professor Marjorie C. Weiss, Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, Avon BA2 7AY, UK. Email: m.weiss@bath.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Baker, R. 1990: Development of a questionnaire to assess patients’ satisfaction with consultations in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 40, 487490.
Bond, C., Blenkinsopp, A. and Raynor, D.K. 2012: Prescribing and partnership with patients. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 74, 581588.
Britten, N. 2001: Prescribing and the defence of clinical autonomy. Sociology of Health & Illness 23, 478496.
Charles, C., Gafni, A. and Whelan, T. 1997: Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 45, 681692.
Charles-Jones, H., Latimer, J. and May, C. 2003: Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care. Sociology of Health & Illness 25, 7192.
Chewning, B.A., Bylund, C.L., Shah, B., Arora, N.K., Guegeun, J.A. and Makoul, G. 2012: Patient preference for shared decision: a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 86, 918.
Chewning, B.A., Sleath, B., Shah, B.K., Devellis, B. and Yon, A.S. 2006: Concordance in medication decisions for rheumatoid arthritis: patient-provider discussion pathways. European Association of Communication in Healthcare Conference, 5–9 September, Basel, Switzerland.
Cooper, R.J., Anderson, C., Avery, T., Bissell, P., Guillaume, L., Hutchinson, A., James, V., Lymm, J., McIntosh, A., Murphy, E., Radcliffe, J., Read, S. and Ward, P. 2008: Nurse and pharmacist prescribing: a thematic review of the literature. Health Policy 85, 277292.
Cooper, R.J., Bissell, P., Ward, P., Murphy, E., Anderson, C., Avery, T., James, V., Lymm, J., Guillaume, L., Hutchinson, A. and Radcliffe, J. 2011: Further challenges to medical dominance? The case of nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing. Health 16, 115133.
Courtenay, A., Carey, N., Stenmer, K., Lawton, S. and Peters, J. 2011: Patients’ views of nurse prescribing: effects on care, concordance and medicine taking. British Journal of Dermatology 164, 396401.
Cox, K., Britten, N., Hooper, R. and White, P. 2007: Patients’ involvement in decision about medicines: GPs’ perceptions of their preferences. British Journal of General Practice 57, 777784.
Creswell, J.W. 2009: Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, third edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. and Tashakkori, A. 2007: Editorial: different perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 303308.
Cullati, S., Courvoisier, D.S., Charvet-Bérard, A.I. and Perneger, T.V. 2011: Desire for autonomy in health care decisions: a general population survey. Patient Education and Counseling 83, 134138.
De Haes, H. 2006: Dilemmas in patient centredness and shared decision making: a case for vulnerability. Patient Education & Counseling 62, 291298.
Degner, L.F. and Sloan, J.A. 1992: Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 45, 941950.
Department of Health. 2005: Supplementary prescribing by nurses, pharmacists, chiropodists/podiatrists, physiotherapists and radiographers with the NHS in England – a guide for implementation. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health. 2006: Improving patients’ access to medicines: a guide to implementing nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing within the NHS in England. London: Department of Health.
Drennan, J., Naughton, C., Allen, D., Hyde, A., Felle, P.,O’Boyle, K., Treacy, P. and Butler, M. 2009: National Independent Evaluation of the Nurse and Midwife Prescribing Initiative. Dublin: University College Dublin.
Dy, S.M. 2007: Instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making: a structured literature review. Medical Care Research and Review 64, 623649.
Edwards, A. and Elwyn, G. 2006: Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expectations 9, 307320.
Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Mowle, S., Wensing, M., Wilkinson, C., Kinnersley, P. and Grol, R. 2001: Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Education & Counseling 43, 522.
Elwyn, G., Latimer, S., Coulter, A., Walker, E., Watson, P. and Thomson, R. 2010: Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. British Medical Journal 341, 971973.
Epstein, R.M. and Street, R.L. 2011: Shared mind: communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Annals of Family Medicine 9, 454461.
Greenhill, N., Anderson, C., Avery, A. and Pilnick, A. 2011: Analysis of pharmacist – patient communication using the calgary – cambridge guide. Patient Education & Counseling 83, 423431.
Heritage, J. 2010: Questioning in medicine. In Freed, AF and Ehrlich, S, editors, ‘Why Do You Ask?’ The function of questions in institutional discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 4268.
Horne, R., Weinman, J. and Hankins, M. 1999: The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychology and Health 14, 124.
Joosten, E.A.G., DeFurentes-Merillas, L., de Weert, G.H., Sensky, T., van der Staak, C.P.F. and de Jong, C.A.J. 2008: Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 77, 219226.
Jordan, J.L., Ellis, S.J. and Chambers, R. 2002: Defining shared decision making and concordance: are they one and the same? Postgraduate Medical Journal 78, 383384.
Krupat, E., Rosenkranz, S.L., Yeager, C.M., Barnard, K., Putnam, S.M. and Inui, R.S. 2000: The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling 39, 4959.
Latter, S., Maben, J., Myalla, M. and Young, A. 2007: Perceptions and practice of concordance in nurses’ prescribing consultations: findings from a national questionnaire survey and case studies of practice in England. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44, 918.
Légaré, F., Moher, D., Elwyn, G., LeBlanc, A. and Gravel, K. 2007: Instruments to assess the perception of physicians in the decision-making process of specific clinical encounters: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 7, 30, doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-7-30.
Légaré, F., Turcotte, S., Robitaille, H., Stewart, M., Frosch, D., Grimshaw, J., LaBrecque, M., Ouimet, M., Rousseau, M., Stacey, D., van der Weijden, T. and Elwyn, G. 2012: Some but not all dyadic measures in shared decision making research have satisfactory psychometric properties. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65, 13101320.
Makoul, G. and Clayman, M.L. 2006: An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Education & Counseling 60, 301312.
Martin, J. 2008: NHS surveys. Oxford: Picker Institute Europe. Retrieved 27 July 2013 from http://www.nhssurveys.org/survey/533
Mercer, S.W., Maxwell, M., Heaney, D. and Watt, G.C.M. 2004: The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Family Practice 21, 699705.
Naik, N.D., Kallen, M.A., Walder, A. and Street, R.L. 2008: Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus – the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication. Circulation 117, 13611368.
National Prescribing Centre. 2012: A single competency framework for all prescribers. Liverpool: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Retrieved 2 August 2013 from http://www.npc.co.uk/improving_safety/improving_quality/resources/single_comp_framework.pdf
Knapp, P., Raynor, D.K., Thistlethwaite, J.E. and Jones, M.B. 2009: A questionnaire to measure health practitioners’ attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: LATCon II. Health Expectations 12, 175186.
Riley, R., Weiss, M.C., Platt, J., Taylor, G., Horrocks, S. and Taylor, A. 2012: A comparison of GP, pharmacist and nurse prescriber responses to patients’ emotional cues and concerns in primary care consultations. Patient Education & Counseling 91, 6571.
Robinson, A. and Thomson, R. 2001: Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Quality in Health Care 10 (Suppl I), i34i38.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 1997: From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
Say, R., Murtagh, M. and Thomson, R. 2006: Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Education & Counseling 60, 102114.
Seale, C., Anderson, E., Kinnersley, P. 2005: Comparison of GP and nurse practitioner consultations: an observational study. British Jouranl of General Practice 55, 938943.
Sibley, A., Latter, S., Richard, C., Lussier, M.T., Roberge, D., Skinner, T.C., Cradock, S., Zinken, K.M. 2011: Medication discussion between nurse prescribers and people with diabetes: an analysis of content and participation using MEDICODE. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67, 23232336.
Stevenson, F., Barry, C.A., Britten, N., Barber, N. and Bradley, C.P. 2000: Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Social Science and Medicine 50, 829840.
Stevenson, F., Cox, K., Britten, N. and Dundar, Y. 2004: A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance. Health Expectations 7, 235245.
Street, R.L., Makoul, G., Arora, N.K., Epstein, R.M. 2009: How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling 74, 295301.
Towle, A., Godolphin, W., Grams, G. and LaMarre, A. 2006: Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expectations 9, 321332.
Weiss, M.C., Platt, J., Riley, R., Taylor, G., Horrocks, S. and Taylor, A. 2013: Solicitations in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations: an observational study. Family Practice 30, 712718.
Weiss, M.C. and Sutton, J. 2009: The changing nature of prescribing: pharmacists as prescribers and challenges to medical dominance. Sociology of Health & Illness 31, 406421.
Willis, E. 2006: Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociology Review 15, 421431.
Wilson, S.R., Strub, P., Buist, S., Knowles, S.B., Lavori, P.W., Lapidus, J., Vollmer, W.M., and the Better Outcomes of Asthma Treatment (BOAT) Study Group. 2010: Shared decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 181, 566577.
Wunderlich, T., Cooper, G., Divine, G., Flocke, S., Oja-Tebbe, N., Stange, K. and Lafata, J.E. 2010: Inconcsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening. Patient Education and Counseling 80, 358363.

Keywords

Medication decision making and patient outcomes in GP, nurse and pharmacist prescriber consultations

  • Marjorie C. Weiss (a1), Jo Platt (a2), Ruth Riley (a3), Betty Chewning (a4), Gordon Taylor (a5), Susan Horrocks (a6) and Andrea Taylor (a7)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed