Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Use of Polarized Sunglasses During Video Laryngoscopy: A Cause of Difficult Prehospital Intubation

  • Adam James Smith (a1), Ken Jackimczyk (a1) (a2) (a3), Bruce Horwood (a1) (a2) (a3) and Daniel Christenson (a4)

Abstract

Background

In the prehospital setting, many providers advocate for video laryngoscopy as the initial method of intubation to improve the likelihood of a successful first attempt. However, bright ambient light can worsen visualization of the video laryngoscope liquid crystal display (LCD).

Case Report

A patient involved in a motor vehicle accident was evaluated by an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) crew. Initial endotracheal intubation attempt using video laryngoscopy was aborted after the patient desaturated. The primary reason for the failure was poor visualization of the video laryngoscope LCD, despite attempts to block direct sunlight. Debriefing revealed that the intubating provider was wearing polarized sunglasses.

Discussion

Because LCDs emit polarized light, use of polarized sunglasses may cause the display to appear dark. Thus, the purpose of this Case Report is to raise awareness of a potential safety issue that is likely under-recognized by prehospital providers but can be easily avoided.

SmithAJ, JackimczykK, HorwoodB, ChristensonD. Use of Polarized Sunglasses During Video Laryngoscopy: A Cause of Difficult Prehospital IntubationPrehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(1):104–107.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Adam James Smith, MD 2252 N 44th St #2099 Phoenix, Arizona 85008 USA E-mail: adam.smith0213@gmail.com

Footnotes

Hide All

Conflicts of interest: none

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Helm, M, Hossfeld, B, Schäfer, S, Hoitz, J, Lampl, L. Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting – a multi-centre study in the German helicopter emergency medical service. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(1):67-71.
2. Hussain, LM, Redmond, AD. Are pre-hospital deaths from accidental injury preventable? Br Med J. 1994;308(6936):1077-1080.
3. Nicholl, J, Hughes, S, Dixon, S. The costs and benefits of paramedic skills in pre-hospital trauma care. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(17):10-15.
4. Cheung, KW, Kovacs, GJ, LeBlanc, DJ, Gao, J, Sandeski, R, Leslie, RA. Minimal illumination for direct laryngoscopy and intubation in different ambient light settings. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):103-107.
5. Rocca, B, Crosby, E, Maloney, J, Bryson, G. An assessment of paramedic performance during invasive airway management. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;4(2):164-167.
6. Davis, DP, Stern, J, Sise, MJ, Hoyt, DB. A follow-up analysis of factors associated with head-injury mortality after paramedic rapid sequence intubation. J Trauma. 2005;59(2):486-490.
7. Erlich, PF, Seidman, PS, Atallah, O, Haque, A, Helmkamp, J. Endotracheal intubations in rural pediatric trauma patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(9):1376-1380.
8. Mort, TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(2):607-613.
9. Hossfeld, B, Frey, K, Doerges, V, Lampl, L, Helm, M. Improvement in glottic visualization by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation – an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(6):425-431.
10. Vassiliadis, J, Tzannes, A, Hiros, K, Brimble, J, Fogg, T. Comparison of C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscope in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2015;27(2):119-125.
11. Jones, BM, Agrawal, A, Schulte, TE. Assessing the efficacy of video versus direct laryngoscopy through retrospective comparison of 436 emergency intubation cases. J Anesth. 2013;27(6):927-930.
12. Sakles, JC, Mosier, J, Chiu, S, Cosentino, M, Kalin, L. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):739-748.
13. Sakles, JC, Javedani, PP, Chase, E, Garst-Orozco, J, Guillen-Rodriguez, JM, Stolz, U. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(6):700-707.
14. Sakles, JC, Mosier, JM, Patanwala, AE, Dicken, JM, Kalin, L, Javedani, PP. The C-MAC video laryngoscope is superior to the direct laryngoscope for the rescue of failed first-attempt intubations in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(3):280-286.
15. Guyette, FX, Farrell, K, Carlson, JN, Callaway, CW, Phrampus, P. Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in a critical care transport service. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(2):149-154.
16. Cavus, E, Callies, A, Doerges, V, et al. The C-MAC video laryngoscope for prehospital emergency intubation: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(8):650-653.
17. Mosier, J, Chiu, S, Patanwala, AE, Sakles, JC. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(4):414-420.
18. Aziz, M, Brambrink, A. The Storz C-MAC video laryngoscope: description of a new device, case report, and brief case series. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(2):149-152.
19. Russo, SG, Nickel, EA, Leissner, KB, Schwerdtfeger, K, Bauer, M, Roessler, MS. Use of the GlideScope-Ranger for pre-hospital intubations by anesthesia trained emergency physicians – an observational study. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16:8.
20. Ueshima, H, Asai, T. Tracheal intubation in daylight and in the dark: a randomized comparison of the Airway Scope, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(7):684-687.
21. Nao, Y, Kato, T, Kusunoki, S, Kawamoto, M, Yuge, O. Use of the AirWay Scope for tracheal intubation in bright sunlight. Masui. 2007;56(12);1408-1410.
22. Theiler, L, Nabecker, S, Riggenbach, C, Kotarlic, M, Kleine-Brueggeney, M, Greif, R. Intubation success rates of video-laryngoscopes under extreme daylight conditions: a manikin study on a Swiss glacier. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:213.
23. Peatross, J, Ware, M. Physics of Light and Optics. Provo, Utah USA: Brigham Young University; 2015: 143-155.
24. Urone, PP, Hinrichs, R. Polarization. College Physics. Houston, Texas USA: Rice University, OpenStax; 2012.
25. Murphy, DB, Spring, KR, Davidson, MW. Introduction to polarized light. MicroscopyU. https://www.microscopyu.com/techniques/polarized-light/introduction-to-polarized-light. Accessed 2017.
26. Woodford, C. LCDs (liquid crystal displays). Explain that Stuff. https://www.explainthatstuff.com/lcdtv.html. Accessed 2017.
27. Montgomery, RW, Nakagawara, VB. Sunglasses for Pilots: Beyond the Image. Washington, DC USA: Federal Aviation Administration Publication.
28. Loughnan, TE, Gunasekera, E, Tan, TP. Improving the C-MAC video laryngoscopic view when applying cricoid pressure by allowing access of assistant to the video screen. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40(1):128-130.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed