Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Use of a Novel, Portable, LED-Based Capillary Refill Time Simulator within a Disaster Triage Context

  • Todd P. Chang (a1), Genevieve Santillanes (a2), Ilene Claudius (a2), Phung K. Pham (a1) (a3), James Koved (a4), John Cheyne (a5), Marianne Gausche-Hill (a6), Amy H. Kaji (a6), Saranya Srinivasan (a7), J. Joelle Donofrio (a8) and Cynthia Bir (a2)...

Abstract

Introduction

A simple, portable capillary refill time (CRT) simulator is not commercially available. This device would be useful in mass-casualty simulations with multiple volunteers or mannequins depicting a variety of clinical findings and CRTs. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a prototype CRT simulator in a disaster simulation context.

Methods

A CRT prototype simulator was developed by embedding a pressure-sensitive piezo crystal, and a single red light-emitting diode (LED) light was embedded, within a flesh-toned resin. The LED light was programmed to turn white proportionate to the pressure applied, and gradually to return to red on release. The time to color return was adjustable with an external dial. The prototype was tested for feasibility among two cohorts: emergency medicine physicians in a tabletop exercise and second year medical students within an actual disaster triage drill. The realism of the simulator was compared to video-based CRT, and participants used a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from “completely artificial” to “as if on a real patient.” The VAS evaluated both the visual realism and the functional (eg, tactile) realism. Accuracy of CRT was evaluated only by the physician cohort. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric statistics, and mean Cohen’s Kappas were used to describe inter-rater reliability.

Results

The CRT simulator was generally well received by the participants. The simulator was perceived to have slightly higher functional realism (P=.06, P=.01) but lower visual realism (P=.002, P=.11) than the video-based CRT. Emergency medicine physicians had higher accuracy on portrayed CRT on the simulator than the videos (92.6% versus 71.1%; P<.001). Inter-rater reliability was higher for the simulator (0.78 versus 0.27; P<.001).

Conclusions

A simple, LED-based CRT simulator was well received in both settings. Prior to widespread use for disaster triage training, validation on participants’ ability to accurately triage disaster victims using CRT simulators and video-based CRT simulations should be performed.

Chang TP , Santillanes G , Claudius I , Pham PK , Koved J , Cheyne J , Gausche-Hill M , Kaji AH , Srinivasan S , Donofrio JJ , Bir C . Use of a Novel, Portable, LED-Based Capillary Refill Time Simulator within a Disaster Triage Context. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(4):451456.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Todd P. Chang, MD, MAcM Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Division of Emergency Medicine 4650 Sunset Blvd. Mailstop 113 Los Angeles, California 90027 USA E-mail: dr.toddchang@gmail.com

Footnotes

Hide All

Conflicts of interest/funding: Research reported in this publication was partially supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland USA) under Award Number UL1TR000130 (formerly by the National Center for Research Resources, Award Number UL1RR031986). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This research was presented at the International Meeting on Simulation in Healthcare, 2015 (New Orleans, Louisiana USA).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Steiner, MJ, DeWalt, DA, Byerley, JS. Is this child dehydrated? JAMA. 2004;291(22):2746-2754.
2. Fleming, S, Gill, P, Jones, C, et al. Validity and reliability of measurement of capillary refill time in children: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(3):239-249.
3. Cross, KP, Cicero, MX. Head-to-head comparison of disaster triage methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):668-676.
4. Cone, DC, Serra, J, Kurland, L. Comparison of the SALT and Smart triage systems using a virtual reality simulator with paramedic students. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):314-321.
5. Wallis, LA, Carley, S. Validation of the Pediatric Triage Tape. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(1):47-50.
6. Dieckmann, RA, Brownstein, D, Gausche-Hill, M. The pediatric assessment triangle: a novel approach for the rapid evaluation of children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010;26(4):312-315.
7. Chan, TC, Griswold, WG, Buono, C, et al. Impact of wireless electronic medical record system on the quality of patient documentation by emergency field responders during a disaster mass-casualty exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(4):268-275.
8. Klima, DA, Seiler, SH, Peterson, JB, et al. Full-scale regional exercises: closing the gaps in disaster preparedness. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):592-597.
9. Alexander, AJ, Bandiera, GW, Mazurik, L. A multiphase disaster training exercise for emergency medicine residents: opportunity knocks. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(5):404-409.
10. Brabrand, M, Hosbond, S, Folkestad, L. Capillary refill time: a study of inter-observer reliability among nurses and nurse assistants. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18(1):46-49.
11. Curtis, MT, DiazGranados, D, Feldman, M. Judicious use of simulation technology in continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32(4):255-260.
12. Claudius, I, Kaji, A, Santillanes, G, et al. Comparison of computerized patients versus live moulaged actors for a mass-casualty drill. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):1-5.
13. Devitt, J, Kurrek, MM, Cohen, MM, Cleave-Hogg, D. The validity of performance assessments using simulation. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(1):36-42.
14. Hung, A, Zehnder, P, Patil, MB, et al. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol. 2011;186(3):1019-1025.
15. Dieckmann, P, Gaba, D, Rall, M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(3):183-193.
16. Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Lang, AG, Buchner, A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191.
17. Hallgren, KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34.
18. Light, R. Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psych Bulletin. 1971;76(5):365-377.
19. Diaz-Uriarte, R. Incorrect analysis of crossover trials in animal behaviour research. Animal Behaviour. 2002;63(4):815-822.
20. Norman, G, Dore, K, Grierson, L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):636-647.
21. Anderson, B, Kelly, A, Kerr, D, Clooney, M, Jolley, D. Impact of patient and environmental factors on capillary refill time. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(1):62-65.
22. Brown, L, Prasad, NH, Whitley, TW. Adverse lighting condition effects on the assessment of CRT. Am J Emerg Med. 1994;12(1):46-47.
23. Gorelick, M, Shaw, KN, Baker, MD. Effect of ambient temperature on CRT in healthy children. Pediatrics. 1993;92(5):699-702.
24. Dror, I, Schmidt, P, O’Connor, L. A cognitive perspective on technology enhanced learning in medical training: great opportunities, pitfalls and challenges. Med Teach. 2011;33(4):291-296.

Keywords

Type Description Title
VIDEO
Supplementary materials

Chang supplementary material
Chang supplementary material 1

 Video (12.7 MB)
12.7 MB

Use of a Novel, Portable, LED-Based Capillary Refill Time Simulator within a Disaster Triage Context

  • Todd P. Chang (a1), Genevieve Santillanes (a2), Ilene Claudius (a2), Phung K. Pham (a1) (a3), James Koved (a4), John Cheyne (a5), Marianne Gausche-Hill (a6), Amy H. Kaji (a6), Saranya Srinivasan (a7), J. Joelle Donofrio (a8) and Cynthia Bir (a2)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed