Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Remote, Multi-Day Music Festival

  • Ross Prager (a1), Colin Sedgwick (a2), Adam Lund (a1), Daniel Kim (a1) (a3), Ben Ho (a1), Maja Stachura (a1) (a3) and Samuel Gutman (a1)...

Abstract

Introduction

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has become an important diagnostic tool for hospital-based clinicians. This study assesses the role of POCUS at Pemberton Music Festival 2016 (Pemberton, British Columbia [BC], Canada), a remote mass gathering where physicians face limited resources, complex disposition decisions, and a dynamic clinical environment.

Objectives

This study prospectively evaluated the impact of POCUS on patient diagnosis, management, and disposition based on the self-report of the study physicians. The authors hypothesized that having ultrasound available for use would aid in diagnostic and management decisions and would reduce the need to transfer patients off-site to other health care facilities, reducing impact on the acute health services in the host community.

Methods

A handheld ultrasound was available for use by physicians in the main medical tent. All participating physicians self-reported their training and comfort using POCUS. After each POCUS scan, physicians completed a survey and recorded the indication for use, scans performed, and impact on patient diagnosis, management, and disposition.

Results

In total, POCUS was used on 28 of the 686 patients treated in the main medical tent; POCUS was reported to narrow the differential diagnosis in 64% of cases and altered the working diagnosis in 21% of cases. Its use changed the management plan in 39% of patients. Its use was reported to reduce the burden on broader health care resource utilization in 46% of cases and prevented ambulance transport off-site in 32% of cases (nine cases in total). This corresponded to an absolute risk reduction of 1.3% for the percentage of patients transferred to hospital (PPTH; relative risk reduction of 53%).

Conclusion:

Physicians reported that POCUS improved the diagnosis, management, and disposition of select patients at a remote, multi-day music festival. Also, POCUS reduced ambulance transfers off-site and reduced the perceived burden on broader health care utilization.

PragerR, SedgwickC, LundA, KimD, HoB, StachuraM, GutmanS. Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Remote, Multi-Day Music Festival. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):484489.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Ross T. Prager, MD c/o Dr. Samuel Gutman Lions Gate Hospital Emergency Department 231 15th St E North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7L 2L7 E-mail: r.thomas.p@hotmail.com

Footnotes

Hide All

Conflicts of interest: AL leads a university-linked academic program in mass-gathering medicine. AL has worked for over 30 years in volunteer and contracted roles as a clinician and medical director at mass-gathering events and is a co-owner of several companies related to the provision of medical services. SG is president of Rockdoc Consulting Inc. (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Rockdoc is a commercial provider of event medical services. Rockdoc was contracted to provide medical services for the Pemberton Music Festival (Pemberton, British Columbia, Canada). All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1. Grant, WD, Nacca, NE, Prince, LA, Scott, JM. Mass-gathering medical care: retrospective analysis of patient presentations over five years at a multi-day mass gathering. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010; 25(2):183-187.
2. Hutton, A, Ranse, J, Verdonk, N, Ullah, S, Arbon, P. Understanding the characteristics of patient presentations of young people at outdoor music festivals. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):160-166.
3. Turris, SA, Lund, A. Mortality at music festivals: academic and grey literature for case finding. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017; 32(1):58-63.
4. Lund, A, Turris, SA. Mass-gathering medicine: risks and patient presentations at a 2-day electronic dance music event. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015; 30(3):271-278.
5. Lund, A, Turris, SA, Bowles, R. Conceptualizing the impact of special events on community health service levels: an operational analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014; 29(5):525-531.
6. Pemberton Valley: Current Population. Pemberton Chamber Web site 2006. https://www.pembertonchamber.com/pemberton/resources/demographics/current-population/. Accessed February 6, 2018.
7. Population and Dwelling Count Highlight Tables, 2011. Canadian Census 2011. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/hlt-fst/pd-pl/Table-Tableau.cfm?LANG=Eng&T=802&SR=1&S=3&O=D&RPP=9999&CMA=0&PR=59. Accessed February 6, 2018.
8. Moore, CL, Copel, JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749-757.
9. Kirkpatrick, AW, Brown, DR, Crickmer, S, et al. Hand-held portable sonography for the on-mountain exclusion of a pneumothorax. Wilderness Environ Med. 2001;12(4):270-272.
10. Nations, JA, Browning, RF. Battlefield applications for handheld ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2011;27(3):171-176.
11. Sargsyan, AE, Hamilton, DR, Jones, JA, et al. FAST at MACH 20: clinical ultrasound aboard the International Space Station. J Trauma. 2005; 58(1):35-39.
12. Marshburn, TH, Hadfield, CA, Sargsyan, AE, Garcia, K, Ebert, D, Dulchavsky, SA. New heights in ultrasound: first report of spinal ultrasound from the international space station. J Emerg Med. 2014; 46(1):61-70.
13. Sippel, S, Muruganandan, K, Levine, A, Shah, S. Review article: use of ultrasound in the developing world. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4:72.
14. Whitson, MR, Mayo, PH. Ultrasonography in the emergency department. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):227.
15. Arntfield, RT, Millington, SJ. Point of care cardiac ultrasound applications in the emergency department and intensive care unit--a review. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012;8(2):98-108.
16. Shekelle, PG, Pronovost, PJ, Wachter, RM, et al. The top patient safety strategies that can be encouraged for adoption now. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(5 Pt 2):365-368.
17. Fleming, S, Bird, R, Ratnasingham, K, Sarker, SJ, Walsh, M, Patel, B. Accuracy of FAST scan in blunt abdominal trauma in a major London trauma centre. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):470-474.
18. Abdulrahman, Y, Musthafa, S, Hakim, SY, et al. Utility of extended FAST in blunt chest trauma: is it the time to be used in the ATLS algorithm? World J Surg. 2015;39(1):172-178.
19. Smith, ZA, Wood, D. Emergency focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) and hemodynamic stability. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(4):273-277.
20. Alrajab, S, Youssef, AM, Akkus, NI, Caldito, G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R208.
21. Zinman, R, Bethune, P, Camfield, C, Fitzpatrick, E, Gordon, K. An observational asthma study alters emergency department use: the Hawthorne effect. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996;12(2):78-80.
22. Campbell, JP, Maxey, VA, Watson, WA. Hawthorne effect: implications for prehospital research. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(5):590-594.

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Prager et al. supplementary material
Prager et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (520 KB)
520 KB

Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Ultrasound at a Remote, Multi-Day Music Festival

  • Ross Prager (a1), Colin Sedgwick (a2), Adam Lund (a1), Daniel Kim (a1) (a3), Ben Ho (a1), Maja Stachura (a1) (a3) and Samuel Gutman (a1)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed