Skip to main content Accessibility help

Performance Indicators as Quality Control for Testing and Evaluating Hospital Management Groups: A Pilot Study

  • Anders Rüter (a1), Heléne Nilsson (a1) and Tore Vilkström (a1)



An important issue in disaster medicine is the establishment of standards that can be used as a template for evaluation. With the establishment of standards, the ability to compare results will improve, both within and between different organizations involved in disaster management.


Performance indicators were developed for testing in simulations exercises with the purpose of evaluating the skills of hospital management groups. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how these indicators can be used to create numerically expressed results that can be compared.


Three different management groups were tested in standardized simulation exercises. The testing took place according to the organization's own disaster plan and within their own facilities. Trained observers used a predesigned protocol of performance indicators as a template for the evaluation.


The management group that scored lowest in management skills also scored lowest in staff skills.


The use of performance indicators for evaluating the management skills of hospital groups can provide comparable results in testing situations and could provide a new tool for quality improvement of evaluations of real incidents and disasters.


Corresponding author

Anders Rüter Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine, University Hospital, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden E-mail:


Hide All
1. Emergo Train System Website. Available at Accessed 19 April 2006.
2.Carbonell, D, Mark, P: The EMA Projects Program Report. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 2006;21(1).
3. Advanced Life Support Group: Major Incident Medical Management and Support. The Practical Approach. 4th Ed 2000. BMJ Publishing Group
4.Lennquist, S: Promotion of disaster medicine to a scientific discipline—A slow and painful, but necessary process. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2003;1(2):9596. Editorial.
5.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Vikström, T: Performance indicators for major incident medical management—A possible tool for quality control? International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2004;2(1–2.:5255.
6.Sundnes, KO, Birnbaum, ML (eds.): Health disaster management guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Prehosp Disast Med 2003;17(suppl 3):s11–s20.
7.Oyegbite, K: What have we learned?—Coordination. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(6):471474.
8.MacFarlane, C, Benn, CA: Evaluation of emergency medical systems: A classification to assist in determination of indicators. Emerg Med J 2003;20(2):188191.
9.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Vikström, T: Performance indicators for prehospital command and control in training of medical first responders. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2004;2(3):8992.
10.Rüter, A, Dahlé, N, Wikström, T: Evaluation of medical management using performance indicators. Case report. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2004;12:108109. [Article in Swedish].
11.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Wikström, T: A new system for transmission of online information from scene of accident and ambulances to hospitals. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2003;1(2):127131.
12.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Wikström, T: Comparison of an online information system with a conventional ambulance file system regarding the retrieval of information after missions. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2005;3(1–4):3740.
13.Thomas, TL, Hsu, EB, Kim, H et al: The incident command system in disasters: evaluation methods for a hospitalbased exercise. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(1):1423.



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed