Wong, DF, Spencer, C, Boyd, L, Burkle, FM Jr, Archer, F. Disaster metrics: a comprehensive framework for disaster evaluation typologies. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(5):501–514.
Task Force on Quality Control of Disaster Management (TFQCDM); World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM); Nordic Society for Disaster Medicine. Health disaster management guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;17(Supplement 3):1–177.
Kulling, P, Birnbaum, M, Murray, V, Rockenschaub, G. Guidelines for reports on health crises and critical health events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(4):377–382.
Powers, R, Daily, E (eds). International Disaster Nursing. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press and World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine;
Stephenson, C. Impacts Framework for Natural Disasters and Fire Emergencies. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University and Bushfire CRC; 2010.
Debacker, M, Hubloue, I, Dhondt, E, et al. Utstein-style template for uniform data reporting of acute medical response in disasters. PLoS Curr. 2012;4.
Sundnes, KO. Health disaster management: guidelines for evaluation and research in the “Utstein Style.” Structural framework and preparedness. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(14):3–195.
Glassey, S. Preventing “lessons lost:” is evidence-based dynamic doctrine the answer? Australian J Emerg Manag. 2015;30(3):11–14.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP, Loretti, A. Disaster research/evaluation frameworks, Part 1: an overview. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):1–12.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP, Loretti, A. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part I: an overview. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP, Loretti, A. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part II: the disaster health conceptual framework revisited. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):523–538.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part III: framework for the temporal phases of disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(6):628–632.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part IV: framework for societal structures: the social systems. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(6):633–647.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part V: epidemiological disaster research. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(6):648–656.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP, Kushner, J. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part VI: interventional research and the disaster logic model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(2):181–194.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part VII: the relief/recovery framework. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(2):195–210.
Birnbaum, ML, Loretti, A, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part VIII: risk, risk reduction, risk management, and capacity building. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):195–210.
Birnbaum, ML, Daily, EK, O’Rourke, AP, Loretti, A. Research and evaluations of the health aspects of disasters, Part IX: risk-reduction framework. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):309–325.
Stratton, SJ. Disaster research and evaluation frameworks (editorial). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):1–2.
Stratton, S. Is there a scientific basis for disaster health and medicine? (editorial). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(3):221–222.
Twigg, J. Disaster Risk Reduction: Good Practice Review 9. London UK: Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute (ODI); 2015.
Coetzee, C, Van Niekerk, D. Tracking the evolution of the disaster management cycle: a general system theory approach. JAMBA. 2012;4(1):a54.
Lindell, MK. Disaster studies. SociopediaISA. 2011.
Neal, DM. Reconsidering the phases of disaster. IJMED. 1997;15(2):239–264.
CHS Alliance. Humanitarian Accountability Report; On the Road to Istanbul, How Can the World Humanitarian Summit Make Humanitarian Response More Effective? CHS Alliance; 2015.
Sphere Project. The Core Humanitarian Standard and the Sphere Core Standards: Analysis and Comparison. Geneva, Switzerland: Sphere Project; 2015.
Creswell, JW, Miller, DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39(3):124–30.
DeVon, HA, Block, ME, Moyle-Wright, P, et al. Clinical scholarship: a psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155–164.
Keeney, S, Hasson, F, McKenna, H. The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2011.
Fattah, S, Rehn, M, Reierth, E, Wisborg, T. Systematic literature review of templates for reporting prehospital major incident medical management. BMJ Open. 2013;3:1–8.
Argyrous, G. A Monitoring and evaluation framework for disaster recovery programs. Version 2 - May 2018. Sydney, Australia: Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZOG); 2018.
Davis-Stober, CP. When is a crowd wise? American Psychological Association. 2014;1(2):79–101.
Jorm, AF. Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49(10):1–11.
Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. London, UK: Abacus; 2004:296.
Jeon, Y-H, Conway, J, Chenoweth, L, Weise, J, Thomas, THT, Williams, A. Validation of a clinical leadership qualities framework for managers in aged care: a Delphi study.
J Clin Nurs. 2014;24(7–8):999–1010.
Ivankova, N, Wingo, N. Applying mixed methods in action research: Methodological potentials and advantages. Am Behav Sci. 2018;62(7):978–997.
Bamberger, M, Rugh, J, Mabry, L. Real-World Evaluation: Working Under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage; 2012.
Markiewicz, A, Patrick, I. Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2016:293.
GFDRR. Resilient Recovery: An Imperative for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC, USA: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development; International Development Association for The World Bank; 2015.
Coppola, DP. Introduction to International Disaster Management. Third Edition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2015.
WHO. International Health Regulations (2005): Second Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008. Report No.: ISBN: 9789241580410.
Agenda for Humanity. World Humanitarian Summit 2016. New York USA: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA); 2016. https://agendaforhumanity.org/summit. Accessed October 1, 2018. 51.
Habitat III; New York USA: The United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development; 2016. http://habitat3.org. Accessed October 1, 2018.
O’Connell, D, Wise, R, Doerr, V, et al. Approach, methods, and results for co-producing a systems understanding of disaster. Technical report supporting the development of the Australian Vulnerability Profile. CSIRO; 2018:218.
Attorney-General’s Department. “Understanding the drivers of disaster. The case for developing an Australian Vulnerability Profile.” In: Emergency Management Australia. Canberra, Australia: Attorney-General’s Department; 2017:59.
IASC. IASC Guidelines: Common Operational Datasets (CODs) in Disaster Preparedness and Response. Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-Agency Standing Committee; 2010.
Handbook, UE. Common operational datasets (CODs) and fundamental operational datasets (FODs); New York USA: The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR); 2018. https://emergency.unhcr.org/entry/50307. Accessed October 1, 2018.
World Health Organization; Public Health England; UNISDR. Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management fact sheets. Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management, Overview. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2017:8.
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC). Multi-Sector Initial Rapid Assessment Guidance: Revision July 2015; Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC); 2015. https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/. Accessed October 1, 2018. 61.
Global Cluster for Early Recovery. Early recovery: global cluster for early recovery (GCER); Geneva, Switzerland: Global Cluster for Early Recovery (GCER); 2018. http://www.earlyrecovery.global/about. Accessed October 1, 2018.
Australian Government - Department of Home Affairs. Community Recovery, Handbook 2. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government, Department of Home Affairs; 2018:1–148.
Veenema, TG, (editor). Disaster Nursing and Emergency Preparedness for Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Terrorism and Other Hazards (Second Edition). New York USA: Springer Publishing Company; 2007.
Bamberger, M, Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). Institutionalizing Impact Evaluation Within the Framework of a Monitoring and Evaluation System. Washington, DC USA: World Bank; 2009.
Puri, J, Aladysheva, A, Iversen, V, Ghorpade, Y, Bruck, T. What Methods May Be Used in Impact Evaluations of Humanitarian Assistance? 2015. http://ftp.iza.org/dp8755.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2018.
White House. Some Reflections on Current Debates in Impact Evaluation. New Delhi, India: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie); 2009.
Puri, J, Aladysheva, A, Iverson, V, Ghorpade, Y, Bruck, T. Can rigorous impact evaluations improve humanitarian assistance? J Dev Effectiveness. 2017;9(4):519–542.
3ie. Impact Evaluation Glossary. New Delhi, India: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie); 2012. Contract No.: Version No. 7.
Tan, YSA, von Schreeb, J. Humanitarian assistance and accountability: what are we really talking about? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(3):264–270.
Cosgrave, J, Buchanan-Smith, M. Evaluation of Humanitarian Action Guide. London, UK: Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP); 2016.
Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability. HAP International People in Aid Sphere Project; 2014.
Hilhorst, D. Being Good at Doing Good? Quality and Accountability of Humanitarian NGOs. Disasters. 2002;26(3):193–212.
Blagescu, M, de Las Casas, L, Lloyd, R. Pathways to Accountability: The GAP Framework. London, UK: One World Trust; 2005.
Turoff, M. Past and present emergency response information systems. Commun ACM. 2002;45(4):29–32.
Raman, M, Kuppusamy, MV, Dorasamy, M, Nair, S. Knowledge management systems and disaster management in Malaysia: an action research approach. J Inf Knowl Manag. 2014;13(01):1–15.
Moore, GF, Audrey, S, Barker, M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2015;350:1–7.
Christoplos, I, Knox Clarke, P, Cosgrave, J, Bonino, F, Alexander, J. Strengthening the Quality of Evidence in Humanitarian Evaluations. London, UK: ALNAP ODI; 2017.
Christoplos, I, Dillon, N, Bonino, F. Evaluation of Protection in Humanitarian Action. London, UK: ALNAP; 2018.
Blanchet, K, Allen, C, Breckon, J, et al. Using Research Evidence in the Humanitarian Sector: A Practice Guide. London, UK: Evidence Aid London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Nesta; 2018.
Taylor-Butts, A. Emergency Preparedness in Canada, 2014. Ottowa, Canada: Statistics Canada; 2016.
Security USDoH. 2017 National Preparedness Report. Washington, DC USA: Department of Homeland Security; 2017.
Government Statistician Queensland Treasury and Trade. Queensland Community Preparedness Survey November 2013– Household Preparedness for Natural Disasters. Brisbane, Australia: State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury and Trade); 2014.
Arup. City Resilience Index. London, UK: The Rockefeller Foundation Arup; 2015.
Parsons, M, Morley, P. The Australian Natural Disaster Resilience Index. Australian J Emerg Manag. 2017;32(2):20–22.
Parsons, M, Morley, P, McGregor, J, et al. Overview of Indicators: The Australian Natural Disaster Resilience Index. Melbourne, Australia: Bushfire & Natural Hazards CRC; 2016.
Horney, J, Dwyer, C, Chirra, B, McCarthy, K, Shafer, J, Smith, G. Measuring successful disaster recovery. IJMED. 2018;36(1):1–22.