Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:37:47.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paramedics’ Perspectives on Factors Impacting On-Scene Times for Trauma Calls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2018

Mark Levitan ,
Madelyn P. Law ,
Richard Ferron  and
Karen Lutz-Graul
Mark Levitan*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Madelyn P. Law
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Richard Ferron
Affiliation:
Niagara Emergency Medical Services, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence: Mark Levitan, MD Candidate University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 451 Smyth Road Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8M5 E-mail: m2levitan@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

According to Ontario, Canada’s Basic Life Support Patient Care Standards, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on-scene time (OST) for trauma calls should not exceed 10 minutes, unless there are extenuating circumstances. The time to definitive care can have a significant impact on the morbidity and mortality of trauma patients. This is the first Canadian study to investigate why this is the case by giving a voice to those most involved in prehospital care: the paramedics themselves. It is also the first study to explore this issue from a complex, adaptive systems approach which recognizes that OSTs may be impacted by local, contextual features.

Problem

Research addressed the following problem: what are the facilitators and barriers to achieving 10-minute OSTs?

Methods

This project used a descriptive, qualitative design to examine facilitators and barriers to achieving 10-minute OSTs on trauma calls, from the perspective of paramedics. Paramedics from a regional Emergency Services organization were interviewed extensively over the course of one year, using qualitative interviewing techniques developed by experts in that field. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and entered into NVivo for Mac (QSR International; Victoria, Australia) software that supports qualitative research, for ease of data analysis. Researcher triangulation was used to ensure credibility of the data.

Results

Thirteen percent of the calls had OSTs that were less than 10 minutes. The following six categories were outlined by the paramedics as impacting the duration of OSTs: (1) scene characteristics; (2) the presence and effectiveness of allied services; (3) communication with dispatch; (4) the paramedics’ ability to effectively manage the scene; (5) current policies; and (6) the quantity and design of equipment.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate the complexity of the prehospital environment and bring into question the feasibility of the 10-minute OST standard.LevitanM, LawMP, FerronR, Lutz-GraulK. Paramedics’ Perspectives on Factors Impacting On-Scene Times for Trauma Calls. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(3):250–255.

Keywords

allied health personnelEmergency Medical Serviceson-scene time
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 250 - 255
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: none

References

1. Newgard, CD, Schmicker, RH, Hedges, JR, et al. Emergency Medical Services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the “Golden Hour” in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(3):235-246.Google Scholar
2. Cudnik, MT, Newgard, CD, Sayre, MR, White, LJ. Scene time does not impact mortality in trauma patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(4):S95-S96.Google Scholar
3. Funder, KS, Petersen, JA, Steinmetz, J. On-scene time and outcome after penetrating trauma: an observational study. Emerg Med J. 2011;28(9):797-801.Google Scholar
4. Aydin, S, Overwater, E, Saltzherr, TP, et al. The association of mobile medical team involvement on on-scene times and mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2010;69(3):589-594.Google Scholar
5. Hoyer, CC, Christensen, EF, Andersen, NT. On-scene time in Advanced Trauma Life Support by anesthesiologists. Eur J Emerg Med. 2006;13(3):156-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Goodacre, SW, Gray, A, McGowan, A. On-scene times for trauma patients in West Yorkshire. Emerg Med J. 1997;14(5):283-285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Spaite, DW, Tse, DJ, Valenzuela, TD, et al. The impact of injury severity and prehospital procedures on scene time in victims of major trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20(12):1299-1305.Google Scholar
8. Eckstein, M, Alo, K. The effect of a quality improvement program on paramedic on-scene times for patients with penetrating trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6(3):191-195.Google Scholar
9. Emergency Health Services Branch Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Basic Life Support Patient Care Standards. 2007. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/public/ program/ehs/edu/pdf/bls_patient.pdf. Published 2007. Accessed February 5, 2017.Google Scholar
10. Carr, BG, Caplan, JM, Pryor, JP, Branas, CC. A meta-analysis of prehospital care times for trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(2):198-206.Google Scholar
11. McCoy, CE, Menchine, M, Sampson, S, Anderson, C, Kahn, C. EMS out-of-hospital scene and transport times and their association with mortality in trauma patients presenting to an urban Level I trauma center. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(2):167-174.Google Scholar
12. Ringburg, AN, Spanjersberg, WR, Frankema, SP, Steyerberg, EW, Patka, P, Schipper, IB. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS): impact on scene times. J Trauma. 2007;63(2):258-262.Google Scholar
13. Nagata, I, Abe, T, Nakata, Y, Tamiya, N. Factors related to prolonged on-scene time during ambulance transportation for critical emergency patients in a big city in Japan: a population-based observational study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Gonzalez, RP, Cummings, GR, Phelan, HA, Mulikar, MS, Rodning, CB. On-scene intravenous line insertion adversely impacts prehospital time in rural vehicular trauma. Am J Surg. 2008;74(11):1083-1087.Google Scholar
15. Gonzalez, R, Cummings, GR, Rodning, CB. Midwest surgical association: rural EMS en route IV insertion improves IV insertion success rates and EMS scene time. Am J Surg. 2010;201(3):344-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Turner, J, Nicholl, J, Webber, L, Cox, H, Dixon, S, Yates, D. A randomized controlled trial of prehospital intravenous fluid replacement therapy in serious trauma. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(31):1-57.Google Scholar
17. O’Connor, RE, Megargel, RE. The effect of a quality improvement feedback loop on paramedic skills, charting, and behavior. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1994;9(1):35-38.Google Scholar
18. Jordon, M, Lanham, HJ, Anderson, RA, McDaniel, RR. Implications of complex adaptive systems theory for interpreting research about health care organizations. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(1):228-231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Niagara Health Web site. https://www.niagarahealth.on.ca/site/home. Published 2017. Accessed December 15, 2017.Google Scholar
20. Niagara Health System. Your Guide to Emergency and Urgent Care. https://www.niagarahealth.on.ca/files/YourGuideToEmergencyandUrgentCare.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed December 15, 2017.Google Scholar
21. Niagara Region Web site. Ambulance, Paramedics, and Dispatch Operations. https://www.niagararegion.ca/living/healthwellness/ems/operations.aspx. Published 2017. Accessed December 15, 2017.Google Scholar
22. Hall, S, Getchell, N. Research Methods in Kinesiology and Health Sciences. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins; 2014.Google Scholar
23. Patton, MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 2014.Google Scholar
24. Yin, RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 2009.Google Scholar
25. Richards, L, Morse, JM. README FIRST for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 2013.Google Scholar
26. Bullard, M, Chan, T, Brayman, C, et al; Members of the CTAS National Working Group. Revisions to the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale (CTAS) guidelines. CJEM. 2014;16(6):485-489.Google Scholar
27. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) / Prehospital CTAS (Pre-CTAS). http://caep.ca/resources/ctas#guidelines. Published 2016. Accessed March 1, 2017.Google Scholar
28. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5801.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed March 8, 2017.Google Scholar
29. Olson, K. An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers. Field Methods. 2010;22(4):295-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Seidman, I. Interviewing as Qualitative Research. New York, New York USA/London, England: Teachers College, Columbia University; 2013.Google Scholar
31. Glaser, BG, Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, California USA: Sociology Press; 1967.Google Scholar
32. Corbin, J, Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, California USA: Sage; 2008.Google Scholar
33. Kohn, LT, Corrigan, J, Donaldson, MS. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC USA: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
34. Myers, JB, Slovis, CM, Eckstein, M, et al. US Metropolitan Municipalities’ EMS Medical Directors. Evidence-based performance measures for Emergency Medical Services systems: a model for expanded EMS benchmarking. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12(2):141-151.Google Scholar
35. Burges Watson, DL, Sanoff, R, Mackintosh, JE, et al. Evidence from the scene: paramedic perspectives on involvement in out-of-hospital research. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(5):641-650.Google Scholar