Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Paramedic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Training in End-of-Life Care

  • Susan C. Stone (a1), Jean Abbott (a1), Christian D. McClung (a1), Chris B. Colwell (a1), Marc Eckstein (a1) and Steven R. Lowenstein (a1)...

Abstract

Introduction:

Paramedics often are asked to care for patients at the end of life. To do this, they must communicate effectively with family and caregivers, understand their legal obligations, and know when to withhold unwanted interventions. The objectives of this study were to ascertain paramedics' attitudes toward end-of-life (EOL) situations and the frequency with which they encounter them; and to compare paramedics' preparation during training for a variety of EOL care skills.

Methods:

A written survey was administered to a convenience sample of paramedics in two cities: Denver, Colorado and Los Angeles, California. Questions addressed: (1) attitudes toward EOL decision-making in prehospital settings; (2) experience (number of EOL situations experienced in the past two years); (3) importance of various EOL tasks in clinical practice (pronouncing and communicating death, ending resuscitation, honoring advance directives (ADs)); and (4) self-assessed preparation for these EOL tasks. For each task, importance and preparation were measured using a four-point Likert scale. Proportions were compared using McNemar chi-square statistics to identify areas of under or over-preparation.

Results:

Two hundred thirty-six paramedics completed the survey. The mean age was 39 years (range 22–59 years), and 222 (94%) were male. Twenty percent had >20 years of experience. Almost all participants (95%; 95% CI = 91–97%) agreed that prehospital providers should honor field ADs, and more than half (59%; 95% CI = 52–65%) felt that providers should honor verbal wishes to limit resuscitation at the scene. Ninety-eight percent of the participants (95% CI = 96–100%) had questioned whether specific life support interventions were appropriate for patients who appeared to have a terminal disease. Twenty-six percent (95% CI = 20–32%) reported to have used their own judgment during the past two years to withhold or end resuscitation in a patient who appeared to have a terminal disease. Significant discrepancies between the importance in practice and the level of preparation during training for the four EOL situations included: (1) understanding ADs (75% very important vs. 40% well prepared; difference 35%: 95% CI = 26–43%); (2) knowing when to honor written ADs (90% very important vs. 59% well-prepared; difference 31%: 95% CI = 23–38%); and (3) verbal ADs (75% very important vs. 54% well-prepared, difference 21%: 95% CI = 12–29%); and (4) communicating death to family or friends (79% very important vs. 48% well prepared, difference 31%: 95% CI = 23–39%). Paramedics' preparation in EOL skills was significantly lower than that for clinical skills such as endotracheal intubation or defibrillation.

Conclusions:

There is a need to include more training in EOL care into prehospital training curricula, including how to verify and apply ADs, when to withhold treatments, and how to discuss death with victims' family or friends.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles, California USA E-mail: sustone@lacusc.org

References

Hide All
1. Feder, S, Matheny, RL, Loveless, RS, Rea, TD: Withholding resuscitation: A new approach to prehospital end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006;144(9):634640.
2. Hallstrom, AP, Ornato, JP, Weisfeldt, M, et al. : Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. NEngl J Med 2004;351(7):637646.
3. Dull, SM, Graves, JR, Larsen, MP, Cummons, RO: Expected death and unwanted resuscitation in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23(5):9971002.
4. Sabatino, CP: Survey of state EMS-do not attempt resuscitation laws and protocols. J Law Med Ethics 1999;27(4):297315.
5. ACEP policy statement: Discontinuing resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting. ACEP1997, reaffirmed 2002. Available at http://www.acep.org/3,436,0.html Accessed 05 January 2008.
6. Kellermann, A, Lynn, J: Withholding resuscitation in prehospital care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144(9):692693.
7. Lynn, J, Goldstein, NE: Advance care planning for fatal chronic illness: Avoiding commonplace errors and unwarranted suffering. Ann Intern Med 2003;138(10):812818.
8. Lerner, EB Billittier, AJ, Hallinan, K: Out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate orders by primary care physicians. J Emerg Med 2002;23(4):425428.
9. Marco, CA, Schears, RM. Prehospital resuscitation practices: A survey of prehospital providers. J Emerg Med 2003;24(1):101106.
10. Clawson, JJ, Dernocoeur, KB (eds): Principles of Emergency Medical Dispatch. 3d ed. Salt Lake City: Jones & Bartlett and ACEP, 2005.
11. The Project for Education of Physicians on End of life Care: EPEC EM Available at http://epec.net/EPEC/Webpages/epecem.cfm.
12. McNemar, Q: Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947;12(2):153157.
13. Shears, RM, Marco, CA, Iserson, KV: “Do not attempt resuscitation”(DNAR) in the out-of-hospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44(1):6870. (Policy resource and education based on ACEP policy statement, 2003.)
14. Guru, V, Verbeek, PR, Morrison, LJ: Response of paramedics to terminally illpatients with cardiac arrest: An ethical dilemma. CMAJ 1999;161(10):12511254.
15. ACEP policy statement. Ethical issues for resuscitation, approved, 2001. Available at http://www.acep.org/1,437,0.html. Accessed 05 January 2008.
16. NASEMSD, NAEMSP. National guidelines for statewide implementation of EMS “Do not resuscitate” (DNR) programs. Available at http://www.naemsp.org. Accessed 05 January 2008.
17. Sanders, MJ (ed.): Mosby's Paramedic Textbook. 3d ed. Revised. St Louis: Elsevier, 2007.
18. Bledsoe, BE, Porter, RS, Cherry, RA (eds): Essentials of Paramedic Care. 2d ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
19. Caroline, N (ed): Nancy Caroline's American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons: (AAOS) Emergency Care in the Streets. 6th ed. Boston: Jones & Bartlett, 2008.
20. Chapleau, W, Burba, AC, Pons, PT, Page, D, (eds.): The Paramedic. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
21. Partridge, RA, Virk, A, Sayah, A, et al. : Field experience with prehospital advance directives. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32(5):589593.
22. Heilicser, B, Stocking, C, Siegler, M: Ethical dilemmas in emergency medical services: The perspective of the emergency medical technician. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27(2):239243.
23. Jaslow, D, Barbera, JA, Johnson, E, Moore, W: Termination of nontraumatic cardiac arrest resuscitative efforts in the field: A national survey. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4(9):904907.
24. Pepe, PE, Swor, RA, Ornato, JP, et al. : Resuscitation in the out-of-hospital setting: Medical futility criteria for on-scene pronouncement of death. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001;5(1):7987.
25. Schmidt, TA, Hickman, SE, Tolle, SW, Brooks, HS: The physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program: Oregon emergency medical technicians' practical experiences and attitudes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52(9):14301434.
26. Sanders, AB: Futility in resuscitation from cardiac arrest: Role of out-of-hospital healthcare professionals. J Emerg Med 2003;24(1):8789.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed