Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:18:30.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake on the Utilization and Difficulties Associated with Prescription Medications and Health Aids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Harvinder Sareen  and
Kimberley I. Shoaf
Harvinder Sareen*
Affiliation:
Center for Public Health and Disaster Relief, University of California-Los, Angeles
Kimberley I. Shoaf
Affiliation:
Research Director, Center for Public Health and Disaster Relief, University of California-Los Angeles
*
*UCLA School of Public Health, 10945 LeConte Ave, Suite 1401, Los Angeles, CA 90095–6939, E-mail: hsareen@ucla.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

The medical impacts of disasters have focused on the injuries, illnesses, and deaths related to the disaster. Little has been written about the impact of disasters on persons who use prescription medications or those medications that require refrigeration, or those who require health aids. The objective of this study was an evaluation of the level of utilization of prescription medications and medications that require refrigeration as well as the use of health aids by the population affected by the disaster.

Methods:

Following the Northridge earthquake of 1994, a survey of Los Angeles County households was conducted to assess the impact of the earthquake. A total of 1247 households completed the 48 minute telephone interview. As part of the interview, 10 questions assessed the utilization of medications and medical aids by household members and the effects that the earthquake had on those medications and devices. Chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and logistic regression analysis were applied.

Results:

Of the 1,212 completed interviews, 21% of the households had a family member taking a prescription medication or a medication requiring refrigeration. Associated factors included gender, race, age, household income, level of education, presence of children, and the intensity of the earthquake (by the Modified Mercalli Index). Only 3% of those that reported medication usage noted problems associated with the use of these medications.

Thirty-nine percent of the respondents indicated that someone in the household used a health aid (e.g., eyeglasses, hearing aid, etc.). Usage was related to gender, race, age, household income, level of education, presence of children, and the intensity of the shaking associated with the earthquake. Of these, 6.5% reported difficulty with these aids, usually related to loss or breakage.

Conclusions:

Although the proportions of the population requiring prescription or refrigerated medications and/or for those using health aids in Los Angeles seemingly are small, this translates to 630,000 households in which someone requires medications and 1.2 million households with a requirement for health aids. Thus, there are a huge number of persons at risk for serious medical problems related to these medications and devices that could produce profound medical problems during a disaster. However, during and following a moderate earthquake, it does not seem that the consequences will be great.

Keywords

disastersearthquakeseyeglasseshealth aidshearing aidsimpactmedicationsprescriptionsprimary care
Type
Public Health and Disasters
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 4: The Role of Public Health in Disaster Medicine , December 2000 , pp. 47 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Teeter, DS: Illnesses and injuries reported at Disaster Application Centers following the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. Milit Med 1996;161:526–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Henderson, AK, Lillibridge, SR, Salinas, C, Graves, RW, Roth, PB, Noji, EK: Disaster Medical Assistance Teams: Providing health care to a community struck by Hurricane Iniki. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:726–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Roth, PB, Vogel, A, Key, G, Hall, D, Stockhoff, CT: The St. Croix Disaster and the National Disaster Medical System. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:391–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Saito, K, Kim, J, Maekawa, K, Ikeda, Y, Yokoyama, M: The Great Hansl Awaji Earthquake aggravates blood pressure control in treated hyper sive patients. Am J Hyperten 1997;10:217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Minami, J, Kawano, Y, Ishimitsu, T, Yoshimi, H, Takishita, S: Effect of; Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake on home blood pressure in patients essential hypertension. Am J Hyperten 1997;10:222–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Turner, RH, Nigg, JM, Heller-Paz, D: Waiting for Disaster. Los Ang University of California Press. 1987.Google Scholar
7.Shoaf, KI, Peek-Asa, CA: Survey research in disaster public he: Prehosp Disast Med 2000;15:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar