Skip to main content Accessibility help

Hospital-Confirmed Acute Myocardial Infarction: Prehospital Identification Using the Medical Priority Dispatch System

  • Jeff J. Clawson (a1), Isabel Gardett (a1), Greg Scott (a1), Conrad Fivaz (a1), Tracey Barron (a2), Meghan Broadbent (a1) and Christopher Olola (a1)...



Early recognition of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can increase the patient’s likelihood of survival. As the first point of contact for patients accessing medical care through emergency services, emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) represent the earliest potential identification point for AMIs. The objective of the study was to determine how AMI cases were coded and prioritized at the dispatch point, and also to describe the distribution of these cases by patient age and gender.


No studies currently exist that describe the EMD’s ability to correctly triage AMIs into Advanced Life Support (ALS) response tiers.


The retrospective descriptive study utilized data from three sources: emergency medical dispatch, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and emergency departments (EDs)/hospitals. The primary outcome measure was the distributions of AMI cases, as categorized by Chief Complaint Protocol, dispatch priority code and level, and patient age and gender. The EMS and ED/hospital data came from the Utah Department of Health (UDoH), Salt Lake City, Utah. Dispatch data came from two emergency communication centers covering the entirety of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, Utah.


Overall, 89.9% of all the AMIs (n=606) were coded in one of the three highest dispatch priority levels, all of which call for ALS response (called CHARLIE, DELTA, and ECHO in the studied system). The percentage of AMIs significantly increased for patients aged 35 years and older, and varied significantly by gender, dispatch level, and chief complaint. A total of 85.7% of all deaths occurred among patients aged 55 years and older, and 88.9% of the deaths were handled in the ALS-recommended priority levels.


Acute myocardial infarctions may present as a variety of clinical symptoms, and the study findings demonstrated that more than one-half were identified as having chief complaints of Chest Pain or Breathing Problems at the dispatch point, followed by Sick Person and Unconscious/Fainting. The 35-year age cutoff for assignment to higher priority levels is strongly supported. The Falls and Sick Person Protocols offer opportunities to capture atypical AMI presentations.

Clawson JJ , Gardett I , Scott G , Fivaz C , Barron T , Broadbent M , Olola C . Hospital-Confirmed Acute Myocardial Infarction: Prehospital Identification Using the Medical Priority Dispatch System. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):2935.


Corresponding author

Correspondence: Isabel Gardett, PhD International Academies of Emergency Dispatch 110 S. Regent Street, 8th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 USA E-mail:


Hide All

Conflicts of interest: Jeff J. Clawson is the inventor of the Medical Priority Dispatch Protocol System (MPDS) studied herein. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.



Hide All
1. CDC. Leading Causes of Death. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Published October 7, 2015. Updated April 27, 2016. Accessed September 1, 2016.
2. WHO. The Top Ten Causes of Death. World Health Organization Web site. Published 2016. Accessed September 1, 2016.
3. Go, AS, Mozaffarian, D, Roger, VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28-e292.
4. CDC. Heart Disease Facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Published August 10, 2015. Accessed September 9, 2016.
5. CDC. Heart Disease Fact Sheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Web site. Published June 16, 2016. Accessed September 9, 2016.
6. Bang, A, Grip, L, Herlitz, J, et al. Lower mortality after prehospital recognition and treatment followed by fast tracking to coronary care compared with admittance via emergency department in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Internal J Cardiology. 2008;129(13):325-332.
7. Hochman, JS, Sleeper, LA, Webb, JG, et al. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2006;295(21):2511-2515.
8. Clawson, J, Olola, C, Heward, A, et al. The Medical Priority Dispatch System’s ability to predict cardiac arrest outcomes and high acuity prehospital alerts in chest pain patients presenting to 9-9-9. Resuscitation. 2008;78(3):298-306.
9. Sporer, K, Wilson, G. How well do emergency medical dispatch codes predict prehospital medication administration in a diverse urban community? J Emerg Med. 2013;44(2):413-422.
10. Myocardial Infarction Clinical Presentation. Medscape Web site. Published 1994. Updated March 28, 2016. Accessed September 12, 2016.
11. Brady, WJ. Atypical presentations of acute myocardial infarction: medical and legal consequences. AHC Media. December 1, 2000. Accessed September 9, 2016.
12. Meisel, ZF, Armstrong, K, Mechem, CC, et al. Influence of sex on the out-of-hospital management of chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):80-87.
13. Moy, E, Barrett, M, Coffey, R, et al. Missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: variation by patient and facility characteristics. Diagnosis. 2015;2(1):29-40.
14. Zadek, LA. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1978;1(1):3-28.
15. AHA. STEMI Receiving Center Certification. American Heart Association Web site. Published 2016. Accessed September 7, 2016.
16. Erhardt, L, Herlitz, J, Bossaert, L, et al. Task Force on the Management of Chest Pain: task force report. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1153-1176.
17. Tatum, JL, Jesse, RL, Kontos, MC, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;29(1):116-125.
18. Rusnak, RA, Stair, TO, Hansen, K, Fastow, JS. Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(10):1029-1034.
19. Conti, R, Bavry, AA, Peterson, JW. Silent ischemia: clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:435-441.
20. Kannel, WB, Abbot, RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction: an update on the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1984;311(18):1144-1147.
21. Valensi, P, Lorgis, L, Cottin, Y. Prevalence, incidence, predictive factors and prognosis of silent myocardial infarction: a review of the literature. Archives of Cardiovascular Disease. 2011;104:178-188.
22. Lusiana, L, Perrone, A, Pesavento, R, et al. Prevalence, clinical features, and acute course of atypical myocardial infarction. Angiology. 1994;45(1):49-55.
23. Tan, MP, Kenny, RA. Cardiovascular assessment of falls in older people. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2006;1(1):57-66.
24. Alboni, P, Brignole, M, Menozzi, C, et al. Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease. J Am Coll Card. 2001;37(7):1921-1928.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Hospital-Confirmed Acute Myocardial Infarction: Prehospital Identification Using the Medical Priority Dispatch System

  • Jeff J. Clawson (a1), Isabel Gardett (a1), Greg Scott (a1), Conrad Fivaz (a1), Tracey Barron (a2), Meghan Broadbent (a1) and Christopher Olola (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.