Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters

  • Brendan G. Carr (a1) (a2), Lauren Walsh (a3), Justin C. Williams (a4), John P. Pryor (a5) and Charles C. Branas (a5)...

Abstract

Background

Though the US civilian trauma care system plays a critical role in disaster response, there is currently no systems-based strategy that enables hospital emergency management and local and regional emergency planners to quantify, and potentially prepare for, surges in trauma care demand that accompany mass-casualty disasters.

Objective

A proof-of-concept model that estimates the geographic distributions of patients, trauma center resource usage, and mortality rates for varying disaster sizes, in and around the 25 largest US cities, is presented. The model was designed to be scalable, and its inputs can be modified depending on the planning assumptions of different locales and for different types of mass-casualty events.

Methods

To demonstrate the model’s potential application to real-life planning scenarios, sample disaster responses for 25 major US cities were investigated using a hybrid of geographic information systems and dynamic simulation-optimization. In each city, a simulated, fast-onset disaster epicenter, such as might occur with a bombing, was located randomly within one mile of its population center. Patients then were assigned and transported, in simulation, via the new model to Level 1, 2, and 3 trauma centers, in and around each city, over a 48-hour period for disaster scenario sizes of 100, 500, 5000, and 10,000 casualties.

Results

Across all 25 cities, total mean mortality rates ranged from 26.3% in the smallest disaster scenario to 41.9% in the largest. Out-of-hospital mortality rates increased (from 21.3% to 38.5%) while in-hospital mortality rates decreased (from 5.0% to 3.4%) as disaster scenario sizes increased. The mean number of trauma centers involved ranged from 3.0 in the smallest disaster scenario to 63.4 in the largest. Cities that were less geographically isolated with more concentrated trauma centers in their surrounding regions had lower total and out-of-hospital mortality rates. The nine US cities listed as being the most likely targets of terrorist attacks involved, on average, more trauma centers and had lower mortality rates compared with the remaining 16 cities.

Conclusions

The disaster response simulation model discussed here may offer insights to emergency planners and health systems in more realistically planning for mass-casualty events. Longer wait and transport times needed to distribute high numbers of patients to distant trauma centers in fast-onset disasters may create predictable increases in mortality and trauma center resource consumption. The results of the modeled scenarios indicate the need for a systems-based approach to trauma care management during disasters, since the local trauma center network was often too small to provide adequate care for the projected patient surge. Simulation of out-of-hospital resources that might be called upon during disasters, as well as guidance in the appropriate execution of mutual aid agreements and prevention of over-response, could be of value to preparedness planners and emergency response leaders. Study assumptions and limitations are discussed.

Carr BG , Walsh L , Williams JC , Pryor JP , Branas CC . A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(4):413421.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Lauren Walsh, MPH Senior Policy Analyst GAP Solutions, Inc. E-mail: lauren.walsh@hhs.gov

References

Hide All
1. MacKenzie, EJ, Rivara, FP, Jurkovich, GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366-378.
2. Mackenzie, EJ, Hoyt, DB, Sacra, JC, et al. A national inventory of hospital trauma centers. JAMA. 2003;289(12):1515-1522.
3. Maningas, PA, Robison, M, Mallonee, S. The EMS response to the Oklahoma City bombing. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1997;12(2):80-85.
4. McDougal, P. Trauma Center Nurses Role in Disaster Planning. Society of Trauma Nurses Position Statement. http://www.traumanurses.org/_resources/documents/news/legislature/ position_on_role_in_disaster_planning.pdf?phpMyAdmin=YUKhXpm3NuRfJ3YccE22H8dYHvf. Accessed December 1, 2015.
5. Cushman, JG, Pachter, HL, Beaton, HL. Two New York City hospitals’ surgical response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack in New York City. J Trauma. 2003;54(1):147-155.
6. Greenberg, R. Boston Marathon Bombing Emphasizes Vital Role of Trauma Centers. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/ june2013/346228/trauma-centers.html. Accessed December 1, 2015.
7. Area Hospitals Treat Patients Following Deadly Train Derailment. CBS Philly New Report. May 13, 2015. http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/05/13/area-hospitals-treat-passengers-following-port-richmond-train-derailment/. Accessed December 1, 2015.
8. Fallows, J. Success without victory. A “containment” strategy for the age of terror. Atlantic Monthly. 2005;295(1):80-90.
9. Waxman, HA. Hospital emergency surge capacity: not ready for the “predictable surprise.” US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. May 2008.
10. Lurie, N. From hospitals to health care coalitions: transforming health preparedness and response in our communities. US Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Report on the Hospital Preparedness Program, 2009.
11. Mahoney, LE, Whiteside, DF, Belue, HE, Mortisugu, KP, Esch, VH. Disaster medical assistance teams. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(3):354-358.
12. Branas, CC, MacKenzie, EJ, Williams, JC, et al. Access to trauma centers in the United States. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2626-2633.
13. Kanter, RK. Regional variation in critical care evacuation needs for children after a mass-casualty incident. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(2):146-149.
14. Otsuka, N, Yamashita, A, Kimura, Y, et al. Experience of DMAT rescue activity by doctor-helicopter in Tohoku Area after the earthquake. Masui. 2012;61(7):771-774.
15. Cassell, EA, Dorioz, JM, Kort, RL, et al. Modeling phosphorus dynamics in ecosystems: mass balance and dynamic simulation approaches. J Environment Quality. 1998;27(2):293-298.
16. Jaworski, NA, Groffman, PM, Keller, AA, Prager, JC. A watershed nitrogen and phosphorus balance: the upper Potomac River basin. Estuaries. 1992;15(1):83-95.
17. Lerner, EB, Cone, DC, Weinstein, ES, et al. Mass-casualty triage: an evaluation of the science and refinement of a national guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(2):129-137.
18. Pryor, JP. The 2001 World Trade Center disaster. Int J Disaster Med. 2003;1:1-14.
19. Rivara, FP, Nathens, AB, Jurkovich, GJ, Maier, RV. Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters? J Trauma. 2006;61(4):949-953.
20. Macintyre, AG, Christopher, GW, Eitzen, E Jr, et al. Weapons of mass destruction events with contaminated casualties: effective planning for health care facilities. JAMA. 2000;283(2):242-249.
21. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Counterterrorism Threat Assessment and Warning Unit, Counterterrorism Division. Terrorism in the United States, 1999. 30 Years of Terrorism, A Special Retrospective. 2000 Federal Bureau of Investigation:1-61.
22. Prescott, JE. “Terrorism: EMS issues and management.” In: Schwartz GR, (ed). Principles and Practice of Emergency Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA: Lea & Febinger; 1992: 3226-3234.
23. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the US Health System. Hospital Based Emergency Care at the Breaking Point. Washington, DC USA: National Academy Press; 2006.
24. Frykberg, ER. Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope? J Trauma. 2002;53(2):201-212.
25. Anonymous. Prepared for the unthinkable: EDs respond to terrorist attacks. ED Management. 2001;13(11):121-123.
26. Leaning, J, Briggs, SM, Chen, L. Humanitarian Crises: The Medical and Public Health Response. Massachusetts USA: Harvard Press; 1999.
27. National Association of EMS Physicians. National Implementation of the Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Incident Triage. A Concept Paper for FICEMS Consideration. December 19, 2011. www.ems.gov/pdf/2011/December/10-MUCC_Options_Paper_Final.pdf. Accessed December 2012.
28. Baez, AA, Lane, PL, Sorondo, B, Nituica, C. Trauma triage criteria system compliance for victims of motor vehicle crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2001;45:269-284.
29. Nathens, AB, Jurkovich, GJ, MacKenzie, EJ, Rivara, FP. A resource-based assessment of trauma care in the United States. J Trauma. 2004;56(1):173-178.
30. Hogan, DE, Waeckerle, JF, Dire, DJ, Lillibridge, SR. Emergency department impact of the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(2):160-167.
31. Lennquist, S. The importance of maintaining simplicity in planning and preparation for major accidents and disasters. Int J Disaster Med. 2004;2:5-8.
32. ReVelle, C, Whitlatch, E, Wright, J. Civil and Environmental Systems Engineering. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1997.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Carr supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (18 KB)
18 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed