Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:38:01.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of Rescue Systems: A Comparison between Cologne and Cleveland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Alex Lechleuthner*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, City Hospital Koeln-Merheim, Cologne, Germany
Charles Emerman
Affiliation:
MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Andreas Dauber
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, City Hospital Koeln-Merheim, Cologne, Germany
Bertil Bouillon
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, City Hospital Koeln-Merheim, Cologne, Germany
John A. Kubincanek
Affiliation:
MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
*
City Hospital Koeln-Merheim, II. Department of Surgery, University of Cologne, Ostmerheimerstr 200, 5000 Koeln 91, Germany

Abstract

Introduction:

Comparisons of different emergency medical services (EMS) systems often are reduced to simple comparisons between distinct facilities or strategies (e.g., prehospital physician versus paramedic, “scoop and run” versus “stay and play”).

Methods:

The EMS systems of similar cities (Cologne and Cleveland) in two different countries (Germany and the United States) are compared. The comparison is seen from the perspective of an evolutionary standpoint that reflects the development of the EMS system in connection with the special environments. Data on rescue times, facilities, and (trauma) outcomes are compared.

Results:

No statistically significant differences in outcome between the systems were detected.

Conclusion:

Both systems are developed in special environments and are optimized over decades, which explains the similarities in outcome.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Darwin, C: On the Origin of Species. London: Murray, 1859.Google Scholar
2. Mayr, E: Species and Evolution. Hamburg Berlin: Parey, 1967.Google Scholar
3. Bourliere, F: The Natural History of Mammals. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954.Google Scholar
4. Kouwenhoven, WB, Jude, JR, Knickerbocker, GG: Closed chest cardiac massage in man. JAMA 1960;73:10641066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Safar, P: Ventilation and circulation with closed chest cardiac massage in man. JAMA 1961;176:574578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Ahnefeld, FW, Schroeder, E: Die Vorbereitungen für den Katastrophenfall aus aerztlicher Sicht. Medicine et Hygiene 1966;24:1084.Google Scholar
7. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Committee on Acute Medicine (Safar P, Chairman): Community-wide emergency medical services. JAMA 1968;204:595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bauer, K: Erste chirurgische Hilfe am Unfallort. Hefte Unfallheilkunde 1958;56:915.Google Scholar
9. American College of Emergency Physicians: The Emergency Department Management Guide. East Lansing, Mich.: American College of Emergency Physicians, 1972.Google Scholar
10. Mathey, DC, Buttner, J, Geng, G, et al. : Thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction at scene—A randomized double blind study. Dtsch Med Wschr 1990;115:803809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Copes, WS, et al. : A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma 1989;29:623629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Eastman, AB, Lewis, FR, Champion, HR, et al. : Regional trauma system design: Critical concepts. Am J Surg 1987;154:7983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Pepe, PE, Stewart, RD: Role of the physician in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:14801483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Eisenberg, M, Berger, L, Hallstrom, A: Paramedic programs and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. I. Factors associated with successful resuscitation. Am J Public Health 1979;69:3035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Troidl, H, Spitzer, WO, McPeek, B, et al. : Principles and practice of research. New York: Springer, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sefrin, P, Heinrich: Results of cardiorespiratory resuscitation by (prehospital ) emergency doctors. Dtsch Med Wschr 1991;116:14971504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Eisenberg, MS, Horwood, BT, Cummins, RO, et al. : Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: A tale of 29 cities. Amer J Emerg Med 1990;19:157160.Google ScholarPubMed