Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Evaluation of Intravenous Tramadol for Use in the Prehospital Situation by Ambulance Paramedics

  • Michael E. Ward (a1), John Radburn (a2) and Steve Morant (a3)

Abstract

Introduction:

An evaluation of the opioid analgesic tramadol (Zydol, Searle United Kingdom) was carried-out by ambulance paramedics to assess its efficacy in providing pain relief in the prehospital situation.

Methods:

Type of subjects—Patients suffering severe pain from any cause uncontrolled by other simple methods.

Number of subjects—101 patients received tramadol and 41 patients served as a control. Study design—Random, open study.

Statistical tests—Pain score at scene and on arrival at hospital were compared using Fisher's exact tests (2 sides). Logistic regression analyses also were applied to other factors.

Results:

Pain scores improved for 93.1% of the tramadol treated patients and for 44.0% of the controls. A total of 30.7% of patients treated with tramadol complained of nausea after treatment compared with 17.1% before treatment and with 12.2% of the control patients.

Conclusion:

Pain was significantly decreased by the administration of tramadol. It was safe with only minimal side effects, the major one being nausea. Suggestions are made for areas of further study.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Consultant Anaesthetist, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, England

References

Hide All
1. United Kingdom Ambulance Service Basic Training Manual Section 6.9. 1996 Published by National Health Service Training Directorate, Bristol
2. Chambers, JA, Guly, HR: Prehospital intravenous nalbuphine administered by paramedics. Resuscitation 1994;27:153158.
3. Simpson, HK, Smith, GB: A survey of paramedic skills in the United Kingdom and Channel Islands. BMJ 1996;313:10521053.
4. Focus on tramadol. Adis Drug Reprint. 1993;46;2:311340.
5. Vickers, MD, O'Flaherty, D, Szekely, SM, Read, M, Yoshizumi, J: Tramadol: Pain relief by an opiod without respiratory depression. Anaesthesia 1992;47:291296.
6. Houmes, R-JM, Voets, MA, Verkaaik, A, Erdmann, W, Lachmann, B: Efficacy and safety of tramadol versus morphine for moderate and severe postoperative pain with special regard to respiratory depression. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1992;74:510514.
7. Vickers, MD, Paravicini, D. Comparison of tramadol with morphine for postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery. Europ J Anaesthesiology 1989;12:17.
8. Viegas, OAC, Khaw, B, Ratnam, SS: Tramadol in labour pain in primiparous patients: A prospective comparative clinical trial. European Journal Obstetrics Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 1993;49:131135.
9. Wallenstein, SL, Hondle, RW: The clinical evaluation of analgesic effectiveness. In: Ehrenpris, S., Neidle, A (Eds). Methods in Narcotic Research. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1975, pp 127145.
10. Ward, ME, Fenn, C, McGowan, A: A randomised double blind placebo controlled multicentre study to compare intravenous tramadol with intravenous nalbuphine in patients with moderate to severe pain, attended by ambulance paramedics. Study in progress.

Keywords

Evaluation of Intravenous Tramadol for Use in the Prehospital Situation by Ambulance Paramedics

  • Michael E. Ward (a1), John Radburn (a2) and Steve Morant (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed