Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Effect of Anti-Shock Garments on Prehospital Survival: The Need for Controlled Clinical Trials

  • Paul E. Pepe (a1), William H. Bickell (a2) and Kenneth L. Mattox (a3)

Abstract

There exists strong sentiment, among emergency medical personnel and physicians alike, that the pneumatic anti-shock garment (PASG) “saves lives.” As a result, controlled studies have been criticized as the “withholding of important therapy.” The purpose of this presentation is to confirm the need for controlled clinical trials of the PASG. Despite an early report that the PASG offered no advantage in terms of the presenting emergency center Trauma Score (TS), similar disparagements have continued, particularly because survival data were not discussed. The present report is a pilot analysis of the effect of the PASG on the prehospital survival of patients arriving at an urban trauma center in the United States. In the study, sixty-eight patients were assigned randomly to control and PASG groups in a prospective investigation involving injured patients with systemic hypotension. The 32 control patients, whose mean initial systolic blood pressure (BP) was 59 ± 32 mm Hg, and the 36 PASG-treated patients, whose mean initial BP was 55 ± 31 mm Hg, were found to be well matched for age, sex, type and location of injuries, initial field TS; response, field management, and transport times; and the total amount of intravenous crystalloid infused. The results demonstrated no significant difference between the control and PASG-treated groups in terms of those pronounced dead on arrival at the trauma center (9/32 vs. 10/36). Further studies are therefore justified to determine how the PASG affects the long-term morbidity and mortality of injury victims, particularly those within certain sub-groups such as penetrating abdominal versus those with penetrating thoracic injuries. This report reaffirms the need for early responsible, scientific scrutiny of prehospital interventions.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Kaplan, BH.: (Letter to the Editor) MAST. Emer Dept News VII: 6, June 1985, p.2.
2.Caroline, NL: Emergency Care in the Streets, 2nd ed. Boston, Little Brown & Co, 1983.
3.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Course, Chicago, American College of Surgeons, 1984.
4.National Training Course, Emergency Medical Technician, Paramedic, Module 1–15, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1980.
5. Texas Department of Health, 9 Tex. Reg. 2823 (1984) Codified at 25 Tex Admin. (ODE & 157.68).
6.Trunkey, DD, Lewis, FR.: Current therapy of trauma 1984–85 B.C. Decker, Philadelphia, 1984. p.1.
7.Wayne, MA, MacDonald, SC: Clinical evaluation of the anti-shock trouser: Retrospective analysis of five years experience. Ann Emerg Med 1983;12:342347.
8.Kaback, KR, Sanders, AB, Meislins, HW: MAST suit update. JAMA 1984;222:25982603.
9.MacKersie, RC, Christensen, JM, Lewis, FR: The prehospital use of external counterpressure: Does MAST make a difference? J Trauma 1984;24:882888.
10.Bass, RR, Alison, EJ, Reines, HD.: Tight compartment syndrome without lower extremity trauma following application of PAS Trousers. Ann Emerg Med 12:382384, 1983.
11.Brotman, S, Browner, BD, Cox, EF.: MAS Trouser improperly applied causing a compartment syndrome in lower extremity trauma. J Trauma 22:598599, 1982.
12.Cogbill, TH, Good, JT, Moore, EE.: Pulmonary function after military antishock trouser inflation. Surg Forum 32:302, 1981.
13.Frampton, MW.: Lower extremity ischemia associated with use of military antishock trousers. Ann Emer Med 13:11151160, 1984.
14.Goodenberger, D.: Thrombosis as complication of MAST use. Ann Emerg Med 10:395, 1981.
15.Johnson, BE.: Anterior tibial compartment syndrome following use of MAST suit. Ann Emerg Med 10:209210, 1981.
16.Maull, K, Capehart, JE, Cardea, JA, et al: Limb loss following antishock trousers (MAST) application. J Trauma 21:6062, 1980.
17.Palafox, BA, Johnson, MN, McEwen, DK, et al: ICP changes following application of the MAST suit. J Trauma 21:5559, 1981.
18.Wangensteen, SL, de Holl, JD, Ludewig, RM, et al: The detrimental effect of the G-suit in hemorrhagic shock. An Surg 170:187192, 1969.
19.Williams, TM, Knopp, R, Ellyson, JH: Compartment syndrome after anti-shock trouser use without lower-extremity trauma. J. Trauma 22:595597, 1982.
20. “Mcllvain Files” Military Anti-shock Trousers” KHOU-TV, Six p.m. News, 06/12/84.
21.Bickell, WH, Pepe, PE, Wyatt, CH, et al: Effect of antishock trousers on the trauma score. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:218222.
22.Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Carnazzo, AJ, et al: Trauma score. Crit Care Med 1981;9:672676.
23.Civetta, JM, Nussenfeld, SR, Rowe, TR, et al: Prehospital use of the military anti-shock trouser (MAST). JACEP 1976;5:581587. 29.
24.Kaplan, BC, Civetta, JM, Nagel, EL, et al: Military anti-shock trousers in civilian pre-hospital emergency care. J Trauma 1973;13:843848.
25.Lilja, GP, Batalden, DJ, Adams, BE, et al: Value of the counterpressure suit (MAST) in pre-hospital emergency care. Minn Med 1973;58:540543.
26.McSwain, NE: Pneumatic trousers and the management of shock. J. Trauma 1977; 17:719–274.
27.Pelligra, R, Sandberg, ED.: Control of intractable abdominal bleeding by external counterpressure. JAMA 241:708713, 1979.
28.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Course. Chicago, American College of Surgeons, 1981.
29.Sacco, WJ, Champion, HR, Gainer, PS, et al: The trauma score as applied to penetrating trauma. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13:415418.

The Effect of Anti-Shock Garments on Prehospital Survival: The Need for Controlled Clinical Trials

  • Paul E. Pepe (a1), William H. Bickell (a2) and Kenneth L. Mattox (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed