Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Consensus Process on the Use of Exercises and After Action Reports to Assess and Improve Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response

  • Elena Savoia (a1), Jessica Preston (a2) and Paul D. Biddinger (a2) (a3)

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of disaster preparedness is to ensure that appropriate systems, procedures, and resources are in place to provide prompt, effective assistance to disaster victims, thus facilitating relief measures and rehabilitation of services. Disaster preparedness efforts include the identification of possible health scenarios based on the probability of hazards and vulnerability of the population as a basis for creating a disaster plan. Exercises that simulate emergency response, involving the health and other sectors, have been suggested as useful tools to test the plans on a regular basis and measure preparedness efforts; the absence of actual testing is likely to negate even the best of abstract plans.

Problem

Exercises and after action reports (AARs) are used to document preparedness activities. However, to date, limited analysis has been performed on what makes an exercise an effective tool to assess public health emergency preparedness (PHEP), and how AARs can be developed and used to support PHEP improvement efforts. The scope of this project was to achieve consensus on: (1) what makes an exercise an effective tool to assess PHEP; and (2) what makes an AAR an effective tool to guide PHEP improvement efforts.

Methods

Sixty-one PHEP experts were convened by the use of Nominal Group Techniques to achieve consensus on a series of characteristics that exercises should have when designed to assess PHEP and on the recommendations for developing high-quality AARs.

Results

The panelists achieved consensus on a list of recommendations to improve the use of exercises and AARs in PHEP improvement efforts. Such recommendations ranged from the characteristics of the exercise audience to the evaluation methodology being used and the characteristics of the produced AAR such as its structure and content.

Conclusions

The characteristics of the exercise audience, scenario and scope are among the most important attributes to the effectiveness of an exercise conducted for PHEP evaluation purposes. The evaluation instruments used to gather observations need an appropriate matching between exercise objectives and the response capabilities tested during the exercise, to build the base for the production of a good AAR. Improvements in the design and creation of exercises and AARs could facilitate better reporting and measurement of preparedness outcomes.

SavoiaE, PrestonJ, BiddingerPD. A Consensus Process on the Use of Exercises and After Action Reports to Assess and Improve Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(3):1-4.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Elena Savoia, MD, MPH Division of Policy Translation and Leadership Development Harvard School of Public Health 401 Park Drive Boston, MA 02115 USA E-mail esavoia@hsph.harvard.edu

References

Hide All
1.De Ville de Goyet, C, Monje, HP, Poncelet, JL , et al. Natural Disasters: Protecting the Public's Health. http://new.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2010/9275115753.pdf. Published 2000. 17.
2.Donahue, AK, Tuohy, RV. Lessons we don't learn: a study of the lessons of disasters, why we repeat them and how we can learn them. Homeland Security Affairs. 2(2). http://www.hsaj.org/?article=2.2.4. Published July 2006. Accessed August 23, 2012.
3.Kahn, AS. Public health preparedness and response in the USA since 9/11: a national health security imperative. Lancet. 2011;378(9794):953-956.
4.Seid, M, Lotstein, D, Williams, VL, et al. Quality improvement in public health emergency preparedness. Annu Rev of Public Health. 2007;28:19-31.
5.Nelson, C, Lurie, N, Wasserman, J. Assessing public health emergency preparedness: concepts, tools, and challenges. Annu Rev of Public Health. 2007;28:1-18.
6.Stoto, MA, Nelson, CD, and the LAMPS investigators. Measuring and Assessing Public Health Emergency Preparedness: A Methodological Primer.Working paper. Boston, May 2012. http://lamps.sph.harvard.edu/images/stories/Stoto_Nelson_etal_MeasuringandAssessingPublicHealthEmergencyPreparedness_July2012.pdf. Accessed August 23, 2012.
7.Savoia, E, Agboola, F, Biddinger, PD. Use of after action reports (AARs) to promote organizational and systems learning in emergency preparedness. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(8):2949-2963.
8.US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gaining Consensus Among Stakeholders Through the Nominal Group Technique. Evaluation Briefs, 2006: No. 7. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/evaluation/pdf/brief7.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2013.
9.Delbecq, AL, VandeVen, AH, Gustafson, DH. Group Techniques for Program Planners. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman and Company; 1975.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A Consensus Process on the Use of Exercises and After Action Reports to Assess and Improve Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response

  • Elena Savoia (a1), Jessica Preston (a2) and Paul D. Biddinger (a2) (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.