Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparison of Interventions in Prehospital Care by Standing Orders Versus Interventions Ordered by Direct [On-line] Medical Command

  • C. James Holliman (a1), Richard C. Wuerz (a1), Gaspar Vazquez-de Miguel (a1) and Steven A. Meador (a1)

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to compare the patient care measures provided by paramedics according to standing orders versus measures ordered by direct [on-line] medical command in order to determine the types and frequency of medical command orders.

Design:

Prospective identification of patient care measures done as part of a prehospital quality assurance program.

Setting:

An urban paramedic service in the northeast United States with direct medical command from three local hospitals.

Participants:

One thousand eight paramedic reports from October 1992 through March 1993.

Interventions:

All patient care interventions recorded as done by standing orders or by direct medical command orders. Errors in patient care were determined by the same criteria as in the prior two studies of the same system.

Results:

Direct medical command gave orders in 143/1,008 (14.2%) cases. Paramedics performed 2,453/2,624 (93.5%) of the total patient care interventions using standing orders. In 61 cases (6.1 %), medical command ordered a potentially beneficial intervention not specified by standing orders or not done by the paramedic. 21/171 (12.3%) command orders were for additional doses of epinephrine or atropine in cardiac arrest cases (where the initial doses had been given under standing orders), and 59/171 (34.5%) were for interventions already mandated or permitted by standing orders. The paramedic error rate was 0.6%, and the medical command error rate was 1.8% (unchanged form the prior study of the same standing-orders system).

Conclusion:

Direct medical command gave orders in 14% of cases in this standing-orders system, but 35% of command orders only reiterated the standing orders. More selective and reduced uses of on-line command could be done in this system with no change in the types or numbers of patient care interventions performed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Center for Emergency Medicine, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033 USA

References

Hide All
1. Erder, MH, Davidson, SJ, Cheney, RA: On-line medical command in theory and practice. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:261268.
2. Wasserberger, J, Ordog, GJ, Donoghue, G, et al. : Base station prehospital care: judgment errors and deviations from protocol. Ann Emerg Med 1987;19:867871.
3. Hedges, JF, Heiser, JM, Neely, KW, et al. : Analysis of base station morphine orders: Assessment of supervising physician consistency. J Emerg Med 1990;8:587590.
4. Pointer, JE, Osur, MA: Effect of standing orders on field times. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:11191121.
5. Tortella, BJ, Lavery, FR, Gody, RP, et al. : Standing orders for field intravenous lines do not shorten prehospital time in trauma patients, Prehospilal and Disaster Medicine 1992;7:271276.
6. Ornato, JP, Groen, AL: Superiority of standing orders to start an IV during cardiac arrest over base station orders. Nebraska Med J 1985;70:200201.
7. Cayten, CG, Oler, J, Walker, K, et al. : The effect of telemetry on urban prehospital cardiac care. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:976981.
8. Pozen, MW, D'Agonstino, RB, Sytkowski, PA, et al. : Effectiveness of prehospital medical control systems: An analysis of the interaction between emergency room physicians and paramedics. Circulation 1981;63:442447.
9.Champion, HR, Sacco, WJ, Gainer, PS, et al. : The effect of medical direction on trauma triage. J Trauma 1989;28:235259.
10. Neely, KW, Norton, R, Butkus, E, et al. : The effect of base station contact on ambulance destination. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:906909.
11. Pointer, JE, Osur, M, Campbell, C, et al. : The impact of standing orders on medication and skill selection, paramedic assessment, and hospital outcome: A follow-up report. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1991;6:303308.
12. Holliman, CJ, Wuerz, RC, Meador, SA: Medical command errors in an urban advanced life support system. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:347350.
13. Holliman, CJ, Wuerz, RC, Meador, SA: Decrease in medical command orders with use of a standing-orders protocol system. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12:279283.
14. Palafox, J, Pointer, JE, Marchenke, J, et al. : The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: Issues in medical control. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1993;8:291297.
15. Holliman, CJ, Swope, G, Mauger, L, et al. : Comparison of two systems for quality assurance of prehospital advanced life support services. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 1993;8:303310.
16. Wuerz, RC, Holliman, CJ, Vazquez-de Miguel, G: On-line medical direction: A prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:918.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed