Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-ttgcf Total loading time: 6.945 Render date: 2021-04-14T04:06:52.173Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS – A Descriptive Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2018

Felicia M. Mix
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Martin D. Zielinski
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Lucas A. Myers
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Medical Transport, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Kathy S. Berns
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Medical Transport, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Anurahda Luke
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA Mayo Clinic Medical Transport, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
James R. Stubbs
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Scott P. Zietlow
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Donald H. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas USA
Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota USA
Corresponding

Abstract

Introduction

Hemorrhage remains the major cause of preventable death after trauma. Recent data suggest that earlier blood product administration may improve outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether opportunities exist for blood product transfusion by ground Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

Methods

This was a single EMS agency retrospective study of ground and helicopter responses from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 for adult trauma patients transported from the scene of injury who met predetermined hemodynamic (HD) parameters for potential transfusion (heart rate [HR]≥120 and/or systolic blood pressure [SBP]≤90).

Results

A total of 7,900 scene trauma ground transports occurred during the study period. Of 420 patients meeting HD criteria for transfusion, 53 (12.6%) had a significant mechanism of injury (MOI). Outcome data were available for 51 patients; 17 received blood products during their emergency department (ED) resuscitation. The percentage of patients receiving blood products based upon HD criteria ranged from 1.0% (HR) to 5.9% (SBP) to 38.1% (HR+SBP). In all, 74 Helicopter EMS (HEMS) transports met HD criteria for blood transfusion, of which, 28 patients received prehospital blood transfusion. Statistically significant total patient care time differences were noted for both the HR and the SBP cohorts, with HEMS having longer time intervals; no statistically significant difference in mean total patient care time was noted in the HR+SBP cohort.

Conclusions

In this study population, HD parameters alone did not predict need for ED blood product administration. Despite longer transport times, only one-third of HEMS patients meeting HD criteria for blood administration received prehospital transfusion. While one-third of ground Advanced Life Support (ALS) transport patients manifesting HD compromise received blood products in the ED, this represented 0.2% of total trauma transports over the study period. Given complex logistical issues involved in prehospital blood product administration, opportunities for ground administration appear limited within the described system.

MixFM, ZielinskiMD, MyersLA, BernsKS, LukeA, StubbsJR, ZietlowSP, JenkinsDH, SztajnkrycerMD. Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS – A Descriptive Study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(3):230236.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors report no conflict of interests. Portions of this manuscript were presented at the 20th World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine; Toronto, Ontario; April 2017.

References

1. National Center for Injury Control and Prevention. 10 Leading Causes of Death, United States 2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_age_group_2015_1050w740h.gif. Accessed June 18, 2017.Google Scholar
2. National Center for Injury Control and Prevention. 10 Leading Causes of Death, United States Highlighting Unintentional Injury Deaths, United States 2105. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_injury_deaths_unintentional_injury_2015_1050w760h.gif. Accessed June 18, 2017.Google Scholar
3. World Health Organization. Fact Sheet: The Top 10 Causes of Death – Updated January 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed June 18, 2017.Google Scholar
4. Kauvar, DS, Lefering, R, Wade, CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma. 2006;60(6 Suppl):S3-S11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Eastridge, BJ, Mabry, RL, Seguin, P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431-S437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Haut, ER, Kalish, BT, Cotton, BA, et al. Prehospital intravenous fluid administration is associated with higher mortality in trauma patients: a national trauma data bank analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):371-378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Hussmann, B, Lefering, R, Waydhas, C, et al. the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery. Does increased prehospital replacement volume lead to a poor clinical course and an increased mortality? A matched-pair analysis of 1896 patients of the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery who were managed by an emergency doctor at the accident site. Injury. 2013;44(5):611-617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fries, CA, Midwinter, MJ. Trauma resuscitation and damage control surgery. Surgery (Oxford). 2010;28(11):563-567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Midwinter, MJ. Damage control surgery in the era of damage control resuscitation. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155(4):323-326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ball, CG. Damage control resuscitation: history, theory, and technique. Can J Surg. 2014;57(1):55-60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Stensballe, J, Ostrowski, SR, Johansson, PI. Haemostatic resuscitation in trauma: the next generation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22(6):591-597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Powell, EK, Hinckley, WR, Gottula, A, Hart, KW, Lindsell, CJ, McMullan, JT. Shorter times to packed red blood cell transfusion are associated with decreased risk of death in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):458-462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Cotton, BA, Reddy, N, Hatch, QM, et al. Damage control resuscitation is associated with a reduction in resuscitation volumes and improvement in survival in 390 damage control laparotomy patients. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):598-605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Fisher, AD, Miles, EA, Cap, AP, Strandenes, G, Kane, SF. Tactical damage control resuscitation. Mil Med. 2015;180(8):869-875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Jenkins, DH, Rappold, JF, Badloe, JF, et al. THOR position paper on remote damage control resuscitation: definitions, current practice, and knowledge gaps. Shock. 2014;41(01):3-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Strandenes, G, De Pasquale, M, Cap, AP, et al. Emergency whole-blood use in the field: a simplified protocol for collection and transfusion. Shock. 2014;41(Suppl 1):76-83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Borwn, JB, Sperry, SJ, Fombona, A, Billiar, TR, Peitzman, AB, Guyette, FX. Pre-trauma center red blood cell transfusion is associated with improved early outcomes in air medical trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):797-808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Yann, D, Habas, S, Malan, L, Escarment, J, David, J-S, Peyrefitte, S. Tactical damage control resuscitation in austere military environments. J R Army Med Corps. 2016;162(6):419-427.Google Scholar
19. Karl, A, Pham, T, Yanosky, JD, Lubin, J. Variability of uncross-matched blood use by helicopter EMS programs in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(6):688-694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Stubbs, JR, Zielinski, MD, Berns, KS, et al. How we provide thawed plasma for trauma patients. Transfusion. 2015;55(8):1830-1837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Capone, AC, Safar, P, Stezoski, W, Tisherman, S, Peitzman, AB. Improved outcome with fluid restriction in treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180(1):49-56.Google ScholarPubMed
22. Craig, RL, Poole, GV. Resuscitation in uncontrolled hemorrhage. Am Surg. 1994;60(1):59-62.Google ScholarPubMed
23. Bickell, WH, Wall, MH, Pepe, PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(17):1105-1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Brohi, K, Singh, J, Heron, M, et al. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2003;54(6):1127-1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. MacLeod, JB, Lynn, M, McKenney, MG, et al. Early coagulopathy predicts mortality in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;55(1):39-44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Blackbourne, LH. Combat damage control surgery. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(7 Suppl):S304-S310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Holcomb, JB, Jenkins, D, Rhee, P, et al. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma. 2007;62(2):307-310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Smith, JB, Pittet, J-F. Hypotensive resuscitation. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2014;4(3):209-215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Basu, D, Kulkarni, R. Overview of blood components and their preparation. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(5):529-537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Shuja, F, Shults, C, Duggan, M, et al. Development and testing of freeze-dried plasma for the treatment of trauma-associated coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2008;65(5):975-985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Spoerke, N, Zink, K, Cho, SD, et al. Lyophilized plasma for resuscitation in a swine model of severe injury. Arch Surg. 2009;144(9):829-834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Lee, TH, Van, PY, Spoerke, NJ, et al. The use of lyophilized plasma in a severe multi-injury pig model. Transfusion. 2013;53(Suppl 1):72S-79S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Zehtabchi, S, Nishijima, DK. Impact of transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma and packed red blood cells in a 1:1 ratio on survival of emergency department patients with severe trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(5):371-378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Sperry, JL, Ochoa, JB, Gunn, SR, et al. Inflammation the Host Response to Injury Investigators. An FFP:PRBC transfusion ratio >/=1:1.5 is associated with a lower risk of mortality after massive transfusion. J Trauma. 2008;65(5):986-993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Duchesne, JC, Hunt, JP, Wahl, G, et al. Review of current blood transfusions strategies in a mature level I trauma center: were we wrong for the last 60 years? J Trauma. 2008;65(2):272-276; discussion 276-278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Teixeira, PG, Inaba, K, Shulman, I, et al. Impact of plasma transfusion in massively transfused trauma patients. J Trauma. 2009;66(3):693-697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Holcomb, JB, Tilley, BC, Baranjuk, S, et al; for the PROPPR Study Group. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(5):471-482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. EMS1 Staff. NC paramedics to begin performing blood transfusions. September 30, 2016. https://www.ems1.com/ems-advocacy/articles/130922048-NC-p/. Accessed June 18, 2017.Google Scholar
39. Uhl N. Blood on the Ground. The Official Cypress Creek EMS News Page. August 25, 2016. https://ccemsnews.com/2016/08/25/another-lifesaving-first-for-cypress-creek-ems/. Accessed June 18, 2017.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 33
Total number of PDF views: 211 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th April 2018 - 14th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS – A Descriptive Study
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS – A Descriptive Study
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Prehospital Blood Product Administration Opportunities in Ground Transport ALS EMS – A Descriptive Study
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *