Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Performance Indicators as Quality Control for Testing and Evaluating Hospital Management Groups: A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Anders Rüter
Affiliation:
Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine, University Hospital, Linkömping, Sweden
Heléne Nilsson
Affiliation:
Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine, University Hospital, Linkömping, Sweden
Tore Vilkström
Affiliation:
Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine, University Hospital, Linkömping, Sweden
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Introduction:

An important issue in disaster medicine is the establishment of standards that can be used as a template for evaluation. With the establishment of standards, the ability to compare results will improve, both within and between different organizations involved in disaster management.

Objective:

Performance indicators were developed for testing in simulations exercises with the purpose of evaluating the skills of hospital management groups. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how these indicators can be used to create numerically expressed results that can be compared.

Methods:

Three different management groups were tested in standardized simulation exercises. The testing took place according to the organization's own disaster plan and within their own facilities. Trained observers used a predesigned protocol of performance indicators as a template for the evaluation.

Results:

The management group that scored lowest in management skills also scored lowest in staff skills.

Conclusion:

The use of performance indicators for evaluating the management skills of hospital groups can provide comparable results in testing situations and could provide a new tool for quality improvement of evaluations of real incidents and disasters.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Emergo Train System Website. Available at http://www.emergotrain.com. Accessed 19 April 2006.Google Scholar
2.Carbonell, D, Mark, P: The EMA Projects Program Report. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 2006;21(1).Google Scholar
3. Advanced Life Support Group: Major Incident Medical Management and Support. The Practical Approach. 4th Ed 2000. BMJ Publishing GroupGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Lennquist, S: Promotion of disaster medicine to a scientific discipline—A slow and painful, but necessary process. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2003;1(2):9596. Editorial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Vikström, T: Performance indicators for major incident medical management—A possible tool for quality control? International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2004;2(1–2.:5255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sundnes, KO, Birnbaum, ML (eds.): Health disaster management guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein style. Prehosp Disast Med 2003;17(suppl 3):s11–s20.Google Scholar
7.Oyegbite, K: What have we learned?—Coordination. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(6):471474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.MacFarlane, C, Benn, CA: Evaluation of emergency medical systems: A classification to assist in determination of indicators. Emerg Med J 2003;20(2):188191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Vikström, T: Performance indicators for prehospital command and control in training of medical first responders. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2004;2(3):8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Rüter, A, Dahlé, N, Wikström, T: Evaluation of medical management using performance indicators. Case report. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2004;12:108109. [Article in Swedish].Google Scholar
11.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Wikström, T: A new system for transmission of online information from scene of accident and ambulances to hospitals. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2003;1(2):127131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Rüter, A, Örtenwall, P, Wikström, T: Comparison of an online information system with a conventional ambulance file system regarding the retrieval of information after missions. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2005;3(1–4):3740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Thomas, TL, Hsu, EB, Kim, H et al: The incident command system in disasters: evaluation methods for a hospitalbased exercise. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(1):1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 52 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-86jzp Total loading time: 0.318 Render date: 2021-01-24T10:30:26.234Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Performance Indicators as Quality Control for Testing and Evaluating Hospital Management Groups: A Pilot Study
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Performance Indicators as Quality Control for Testing and Evaluating Hospital Management Groups: A Pilot Study
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Performance Indicators as Quality Control for Testing and Evaluating Hospital Management Groups: A Pilot Study
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *