Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:00:36.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Powder X-ray diffraction data for goosecreekite [CaAl2Si6O16⋅5H2O]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Gunnar Raade  and
Hans-Jørgen Berg
Gunnar Raade*
Affiliation:
Geological Museum, University of Oslo, Sars’ Gate 1, N-0562 Oslo, Norway
Hans-Jørgen Berg
Affiliation:
Geological Museum, University of Oslo, Sars’ Gate 1, N-0562 Oslo, Norway
*
a)Electronic mail: gunnar.raade@nhm.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

X-ray powder data originally published for the zeolite mineral goosecreekite are of poor quality. The new data reported here for material from Norway are compared with powder data calculated from the published structure. The cell is monoclinic (space group P21, Z=2), a=7.422(2) Å, b=17.414(4) Å, c=7.288(2) Å, β=105.43(3)°, V=907.9(3) Å3. F30=32.75(0.023,40).

Type
New Diffraction Data
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 247 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleman, D. E., and Evans, H. T. Jr. (1973). “Job 9214: Indexing and least-squares refinement of powder diffraction data,” U.S. Geological Survey, Computer Contribution 20, U.S. National Technical Information Service, Document PB 216 188.Google Scholar
Benoit, P. H. (1987). “Adaption to microcomputer of the Appleman–Evans program for indexing and least-squares refinement of powder-diffraction data for unit-cell dimensions,” Am. Mineral. AMMIAY 72, 1018–1019. amn, AMMIAY Google Scholar
Dunn, P. J., Peacor, D. R., Newberry, N., and Ramik, R. A., (1980). “Goosecreekite, a new calcium aluminum silicate hydrate possibly related to brewsterite and epistilbite,” Can. Mineral. CAMIA6 18, 323–327. can, CAMIA6 Google Scholar
Gaines, R. V., Skinner, H. C. W., Foord, E. E., Mason, B., and Rosenzweig, A. (1997). Dana’s New Mineralogy, 8th ed., Goosecreekite, pp. 1695–1696.Google Scholar
Hampel, W., and Keck, E. (1990). “Goosecreekit von der Oberbaumühle bei Windischeschenbach (Oberpfalz),” Lapis ZZZZZZ 15 (1), 40–41.Google Scholar
Kraus, W., and Nolze, G. (1996). “POWDER CELL— a program for the representation and manipulation of crystal structures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder patterns,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 29, 301–303. acr, JACGAR CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottens, B., and Hochleitner, R. (1985). “Goosecreekit aus den indischen Zeolith-Lagerstätten,” Lapis ZZZZZZ 10 (5), 22.Google Scholar
Rouse, R. C., and Peacor, D. R. (1986). “Crystal structure of the zeolite mineral goosecreekite, CaAl2Si6O16⋅5H2O,” Am. Mineral. AMMIAY 71, 1494–1501. amn, AMMIAY Google Scholar
Smith, G. S., and Snyder, R. L. (1979). “FN: A criterion for rating powder diffraction patterns and evaluating the reliability of powder-pattern indexing,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 12, 60–65. acr, JACGAR CrossRefGoogle Scholar