Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T09:06:58.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-destructive evaluation of Roman coin patinas from the 3rd and 4th century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2018

T. G. Fawcett ,
J. R. Blanton ,
T. N. Blanton ,
L. Arias  and
T. Suscavage
T. G. Fawcett*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA 19073, USA
J. R. Blanton
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA 19073, USA
T. N. Blanton
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA 19073, USA
L. Arias
Affiliation:
Burker-AXS, Madison, WI 53711, USA
T. Suscavage
Affiliation:
PANalytical Inc., Westborough, MA 01581, USA
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: dxcfawcett@outlook.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Roman bronze coins from the 3rd and 4th century AD exhibit a wide variety of chemistries on their surfaces. This variation has been attributed to the variable methods used to produce the coins, a large number of mints producing bronze currency, and the periods of currency devaluation within the Roman Empire. Besides the base bronze metallurgy (Cu,Sn), Ag, Pb, and Zn were frequently used as coinage metals. Silver coatings were often applied to increase the apparent value of the coins. Over the centuries these surfaces corroded producing a range of patinas. Non-destructive X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence methods were used to evaluate ancient bronze coins. These methods are limited by their half depth of penetration into the coins, so the focus was on the chemistry of the patina's and how they related to the current appearance. Several 3rd-century bronze coins exhibited a very dark patina that was often composed of CuCl, Cu2O (cuprite) and several forms of copper hydroxyl chloride, resulting from surface deterioration caused by corrosion and is often referred to as bronze disease. Coins of the latter 3rd century and 4th century often exhibit patinas that are corrosion products of lead, silver, and tin, as lead and tin preferentially oxidize relative to the bronze alloys.

Keywords

Roman coinsXRDXRF
Type
Technical Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 88 - 97
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertolotti, G., Bersani, D., Lottici, P. P., Alesiani, M., Malcherek, T., and Schluter, J. (2012). “Micro-Raman study of copper hydroxychlorides and other corrosion products of bronze samples mimicking archaeological coins,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402(4), 1451–1457.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. A. G. (Editor) (1990). Coins of the Roman Empire (Routledge Press, New York, NY. first printed by Cambridge University Press, Great Britain).Google Scholar
Chantler, C. T. (2000). “Detailed tabulation of atomic form factors, photoelectric absorption and scattering cross section, and mass attenuation coefficients in the vicinity of absorption edges in the soft X-Ray Z 30–36, Z 60–89, E 0.1 keV–10 keV., addressing convergence issues of earlier work,” J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 29(4), 597–616.Google Scholar
Cribb, J., Cook, B., and Carradice, I. (1990). The Coin Atlas, the World of Coinage From its Origins to the Present day (Macdonald & Co., Publishers, New York, NY).Google Scholar
Fawcett, T. G., Crowder, C. E., Kabekkodu, S. N., and Kaduk, J. A. (2011). “Improved material identification methods through targeted data mining,” Adv. X-ray Anal. 54, 149–161.Google Scholar
Fawcett, T. G., Kabekkodu, S. N., Blanton, J. R., and Blanton, T. N. (2017). “Chemical analysis by diffraction: the powder diffraction file™,” Powder Diffr. 32(2), 63–71.Google Scholar
Hubbell, J. H. and Seltzer, S. M. (2017). Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients (version 1.4), last update 2004. Originally published as NISTIR 5632, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (1995).Google Scholar
Ingo, G. M., Balbi, S., de Caro, T., Fragala, I., Angelini, E., and Bultrini, G. (2006a). “Combined use of SEM-EDS, OM and XRD for the characterization of corrosion products grown on silver Roman coins,” Appl. Phys. A 83(4), 493–497.Google Scholar
Ingo, G. M., de Caro, T., Riccucci, C., and Khosroff, S. (2006b). “Uncommon corrosion phenomena of archaeological bronze alloys,” Appl. Phys. A 83(4), 581–588.Google Scholar
International Centre for Diffraction Data (2014). Technical Bulletin, Search and Identify with Sieve/Sieve+, ICDD. Available for free download at http://www.icdd.com.Google Scholar
Metcalf, W. E. (Editor). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage (Oxford University Press Inc., New York, NY).Google Scholar
Pense, A. W. (1992). “The decline and fall of the Roman denarius,” Materials Characterization, 29, 213–222.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M., Fruhmann, B., Jembrih-Simburger, D., and Linke, R. (2004). “X-rays in Art and archeology: an overview,” Powder Diffr. 19(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Vlachou, C., McDonnell, J. G., and Janaway, R. C. (2002). “Experimental investigation of silvering in late Roman coinage,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 712, II9.2.1–II9.2.12.Google Scholar
Willard, H. H., Merritt, L. L. Jr., and Dean, J. A. (1974). Instrumental Methods of Analysis (D. Van Nostrand & Sons, New York, NY), 5th ed.Google Scholar