No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Small-angle scattering of X-rays in a conventional Bragg–Brentano diffractometer for quantitative analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2013
Abstract
A technique is presented utilizing an unmodified commercial X-ray diffractometer, equipped with a Bragg–Brentano geometry, for reducing preferred orientation effects in measured intensities during quantitative diffraction analysis. The diffractometer setup examined makes possible data acquisition with Θ fixed at 1° and 2Θ scanning the Bragg line. The results obtained with this technique are shown in the quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of three international standards of carbonate rocks (401,402,403).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
Battaglia, S., Franzini, M., and Leoni, L. (1990). “Influence of Grinding Methods on the 101 X-Ray Powder Diffraction Line of α-Quartz,” Powder Diffr. 5, 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaglia, S., and Leoni, L. (1977). “Experimentally measured mass absorption coefficients in quantative X-Ray diffraction analysis,” Ann. Chem. 49(8), 1168–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, L. D., Sirianni, A. F., and Ginsford, G. J. (1983). “A Comparison of Methods for Reducing Preferred Orientation,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. 26, 105–110.Google Scholar
Cline, J. P., and Snyder, R. L. (1983). “The Dramatic Effect of Crystallite Size on X-Ray Intensities,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. 26, 111–117.Google Scholar
Compton, A. H. (1923). “The Total Reflection of X-Rays,” Philos. Mag. 45, 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. R., and Graf, D. J. (1958). “Relation between Lattice Constants and Composition of The Ca-Mg Carbonates,” Am. Miner. 43, 84–101.Google Scholar
Gonnel, H. W. (1928). “Ein Windsichtverfahren Zur Bestimmung Der Kornzusammensetzung Staubförmiger Stoffe,” Zeitschrift V.D.I. 72, 945–950.Google Scholar
Ingamells, C. O., and Suhn, N. H. (1967). “Chemical and Spectrochemical Analysis of Standard Carbonate Rocks,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 31, 1347–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamarchik, P., and Ratliff, J. (1983). “Quantitative Analysis of Platelike Pigments by X-Ray Diffraction,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. 26, 129–135.Google Scholar
Klug, H. P., and Alexander, L. E. (1974). X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials (Wiley, New York), 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Lin, I. J., Nadiv, S., and Grodzian, D. J. M. (1975). “Changes in the State of Solid and Mechano-Chemical Reactions in Prolonged Comminution Processes,” Minerals Sci. Eng. 7(4), 313–336.Google Scholar
Lin, I. L., and Somasundaran, P. (1972). “Alterations in Properties of Samples during Their Preparation by Grinding,” Powder Tech. 6, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, B. H., and Chang, W. J. (1986). “The Amorphous Character and Particle Size Distributions of Powders Produced with the Micronizing Mill for Quantitative X-Ray Powder Diffractometry,” X-Ray Spectrom. 15, 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. K., and Barret, C. S. (1979). “Special Handling Problems in X-Ray Diffractometry,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. 22, 1–12.Google Scholar
Smith, S. T., Snyder, R. L., and Brownell, W. E. (1979). “Minimization of Preferred Orientation in Powders by Spray Drying,” Adv. X-Ray Anal. 22, 77–87.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. M., and Norrish, K. (1966). “The Measurement of Orientation Distribution and Its Application to Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction Analysis,” Clay Minerals 6, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar