Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Torturing science: Science, interrogational torture, and public policy

  • Shane O’Mara (a1) and John Schiemann (a2)

Abstract

Contrary to the claims of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that its torture program was scientific, the program was not based on biology or any other science. Instead, the George W. Bush administration veneered the program’s justification with a patina of pseudoscience, ignoring the actual biology of torturing human brains. We reconstruct the Bush administration’s decision-making process to establish that the policy decision to use torture took place in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks without any investigation into its efficacy. We then present the pseudoscientific model of torture sold to the CIA, show why this ad hoc model amounted to pseudoscience, and then catalog what the actual science of torturing human brains—available in 2001—reveals about the practice. We conclude with a discussion of how a process incorporating countervailing evidence might prevent a policy going forward that is contrary to law, ethics, and evidence.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: John Schiemann, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 285 Madison Avenue, Madison, WI07940. E-mail: jws@fdu.edu.

References

Hide All
1.Mitchell, J. E. and Harlow, B., Enhanced Interrogation: Inside the Minds and Motives of the Islamic Terrorists Trying to Destroy America (New York: Crown, 2016), p. 46.
2., Mitchell and , Harlow, p. 56; see also pp. 153–155, 157–158, 235–236.
3.O’Mara, S. M., “Interrogating the brain: Torture and the neuroscience of humane interrogation,” in Interrogation and Torture: Research on Efficacy and Its Integration with Morality and Legality, Barela, S. J., Fallon, M., Gaggioli, G., and Ohlin, J. D., eds. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).
4.Soufan, A. H., with Freedman, D., The Black Banners: The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War against al-Qaeda (New York: W. W. Norton, 2011), p. 395.
5.Bloche, M. G., “Toward a science of torture?,” Texas Law Review, 2017, 95: 1329–1355, at pp. 13311337.
6.Schiemann, J. W. and Pérez-Sales, P., “Torturing without a parachute: On the science of torture’s effectiveness (response),” Texas Law Review Online, 2018, 96: 144155.
7.United Nations Convention Against Torture, https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspx.
8.U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, “Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program, Findings and Conclusions, Executive Summary,” 2014, p. 38, https://web.archive.org/web/20141209165504, accessed October 5, 2019. Page numbers refer to the pages in PDF of the original release of the combined Findings and Executive Summary, rather than the page numbers of the originally separated documents.
9.McCoy, A. W., A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror (New York: Henry Holt, 2006).
10.Otterman, M., American Torture: From the Cold War to Abu Ghraib and Beyond, (Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing, 2007).
11.KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation (Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency, 1963), http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/index.htm#kubark, accessed September 19, 2019.
12.McCoy, A. W., Torture and Impunity: The U.S. Doctrine of Coercive Interrogation (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2012), p. 21.
13.KUBARK, pp. 41, 90–93.
14.Robin, M.-M., Escadrons de la mort: L’école française (Paris: Idéale Audience and Canal+, 2003), 18: 01–23: 41, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IaA8rTeQRY, accessed September 19, 2019.
15.KUBARK, pp. 90, 93–94.
16.FM 34-52: Intelligence Interrogation (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army, 1992).
17.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 16.
18.U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, “Investigation into the Office of Legal Counsel’s memoranda concerning issues relating to the Central Intelligence Agency’s use of ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ on suspected terrorists,” July 29, 2009, pp. 3031, https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=28555, accessed September 19, 2019.
19.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 16.
20.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 16.
21.Text: Vice President Cheney on NBC’s ‘Meet the Press,’” Washington Post, September 16, 2001.
22.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 16.
23.Mayer, J., The Dark Side (New York: Doubleday, 2008), pp. 4243.
24.Woodward, B., Bush at War (New York: Simon & Schuster 2002), p. 76.
25.Bloche, M. G., The Hippocratic Myth: Why Doctors Are under Pressure to Ration Care, Practice Politics, and Compromise their Promise to Heal (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2011), pp. 136, 135.
26.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, pp. 4546.
27.“Manchester manual,” https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2002/10/08/manualpart1_1.pdf, accessed September 19, 2019.
28.Eichenwald, K., 500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012), pp. 545552, 551.
29.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 47n57.
30.Warrick, J., and Finn, P., “Interviews offer look at roles of CIA contractors during interrogations,” Washington Post, July 19, 2009.
31.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 47n57.
32., Bloche, 2011, p. 139.
33., Bloche, 2011, pp. 140141.
34.Cole, D., ed., Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable (New York: New Press, 2009).
35.Schiemann, J. W., Does Torture Work? (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), p. 3.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190262365.001.0001
36.Lightcap, T. and Pfiffner, J. P., Examining Torture: Empirical Studies of State Repression (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), p. 4.
37.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 46.
38.Bunge, M., Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. 6, Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 1983), p. 203.10.1007/978-94-015-6921-7
39.Bunge, , pp. 202203, 223–225.
40.Bloche, , 2011, pp. 128131.
41.Mayer, , p. 164.
42.Bloche, , 2011, pp. 140141.
43.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 47n58.
44.Bloche, , 2011, pp. 1334, 1340, 1349.
45.Farber, I. E., Harlow, H. F., and West, L. J., “Brainwashing, conditioning, and DDD (debility, dependency, and dread),” Sociometry, 1957, 20(4): 271285.10.2307/2785980
46.KUBARK, pp. 83, 112–113.
47.Biderman, A. D., “Communist attempts to elicit false confessions from air force prisoners of war,” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 1957, 33(9): 616625, at pp. 625, 628.
48.Biderman, A. D., “Social-psychological needs and “involuntary” behavior as illustrated by compliance in interrogation,” Sociometry, 1960, 23(2): 120147, at p. 126.10.2307/2785678
49.Biderman, , 1957, p. 618.
50.Biderman, , 1957, p. 618.
51.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2009).
52.Otte, C.et al., “Major depressive disorder,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2016, 2: 16065.10.1038/nrdp.2016.65
53.Bortolato, B., Carvalho, A. F., and McIntyre, R. S., “Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder: a state-of-the-art clinical review,” CNS Neurological Disorders and Drug Targets, 2014, 13(10): 18041818.10.2174/1871527313666141130203823
54.Farber, Harlow, and , West, pp. 275276.
55.Salim, Suleiman Abdullah, Soud, Mohamed Ahmed Ben, Obaid Ullah (as personal representative of Gul Rahman), v. James Elmer Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen, Complaint, Civil Action No. 2:15-CV-286-JLQ, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, October 13, 2015, p. 77, https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/salim-v-mitchell-complaint, accessed September 19, 2019.
56.Vrij, A., Meissner, C. A., Fisher, R. P., Kassin, S. M., Morgan, C. A. III, and Kleinman, S. M., “Psychological perspectives on interrogation,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2017, 12(6): 927–955, at pp. 939941.10.1177/1745691617706515
57., Mitchell and , Harlow, p. 58.
58.Vrij, A. A., Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
59.Hoffman, D. H., Carter, D. J., Lopez, C. R. V., Benziller, H. L., Guo, A. X., Latifi, S. Y., and Craig, D. C., “Report to the Special Committee of the board of directors of the American Psychological Association: Independent review relating to APA ethics guidelines, national security interrogations, and torture,” July 2, 2015, pp. 167169, https://psychcentral.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/APA-FINAL-Report-7.2.15.pdf, accessed September 19, 2019.
60., Schiemann, pp. 241242.
61.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, pp. 459460.
62.O’Mara, S. M., “On the imposition of extreme stressor states (torture) to facilitate the release of information from memory: A baleful consequence of folk cognitive neurobiology,” Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 2011, 219: 159167.10.1027/2151-2604/a000063
63.O’Mara, S. M., “Torturing the brain: On the folk psychology and folk neurobiology motivating ‘enhanced and coercive interrogation techniques,’” Trends in Cognitive Science, 2009, 13: 497500.10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.001
64., Bloche, 2011, p. 140.
65.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 9.
66.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, pp. 910, 103, 459.
67., Schiemann, pp. 237238.
68.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, pp. 9, 25.
69.Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, p. 99.
70.Lea, H. C. and Peters, E., Torture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1973).10.9783/9781512803587
71.Peters, E., Torture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).
72.Langbein, J. H., Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Regime (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).
73.Rejali, D. M., Torture and Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007).
74.Mialon, H. M., Mialon, S. H., and Stinchcombe, M. B., “Torture in counterterrorism: Agency incentives and slippery slopes,” Journal of Public Economics, 2012, 96: 334110.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.07.011
75.Baliga, S. and Ely, J. C., “Torture and the commitment problem,” Review of Economic Studies, 2016, 83(4): 14061439.10.1093/restud/rdv057
76.O’Mara, S. M., Why Torture Doesn’t Work: The Neuroscience of Interrogation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).10.4159/9780674915510
77.Aggleton, J. P., O’Mara, S. M., Vann, S. D., Tsanov, M., Wright, N., and Erichsen, J., “Reciprocal hippocampal-anterior thalamic pathways for memory: A network of direct and indirect actions,” European Journal of Neuroscience, 2010, 12: 22922307.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07251.x
78.Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B., and Chattarji, S., “Stress, memory and the amygdala,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10(6): 423433.10.1038/nrn2651
79.O’Mara, S. M., “The captive brain: Torture and the neuroscience of humane interrogation,” QJM: Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians, 2018, 111(2): 7378.10.1093/qjmed/hcx252
80.Bull, R., ed., Investigative Interviewing (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2014).10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7
81.Hasting, M., The Secret War: Spies, Codes and Guerrillas, 1939–45 (London: William Collins, 2015).
82.Meissner, C., Kelly, C., and Woestehoff, S., “Improving the effectiveness of suspect interrogations,” Annual Review of the Law and Social Science, 2015, 11(1): 211233.10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657
83.Alison, L. and Alison, E., “Revenge versus rapport: Interrogation, terrorism, and torture,” American Psychologist, 2017, 72(3): 266277.10.1037/amp0000064
84.Méndez, J. E., “Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment,” UN Document A/71/298, 2016, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/839995?ln=en, accessed September 19, 2019.
85.Boal, M., Zero Dark Thirty: An Original Screenplay (Culver City, CA: Sony Pictures Corporation, 2011), p. 6, http://flash.sonypictures.com/shared/movies/zerodarkthirty/zdt_script.pdf, accessed September 19, 2019.
86., O’Mara, 2015, p. 98.
87.Zelikow, P., “Codes of conduct for a twilight war,” Houston Law Review, 2012, 49: 152.

Keywords

Torturing science: Science, interrogational torture, and public policy

  • Shane O’Mara (a1) and John Schiemann (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed