Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

How and why disgust responses underlie prejudice: Evidence from the field

  • Michael Bang Petersen (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Michael Bang Petersen, Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies and Department of Political Science, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 6B, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Aarhus C, Denmark. Email: michael@aias.au.dk

References

Hide All
1 Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., and Arceneaux, K., “The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions: Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration,” American Political Science Review , 2017, 111(2): 277294.
2 Tooby, J., “Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex,” Journal of Theoretical Biology , 1982, 97(4): 557576.
3 Diamond, J., Guns, Germs and Steel (New York: Random House, 1997).
4 Schaller, M. and Park, J. H., “The behavioral immune system (and why it matters),” Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2011, 20(2): 99103.
5 Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., and DeScioli, P., “Disgust: Evolved function and structure,” Psychological Review , 2013, 120(1): 6584.
6 Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., and Duncan, L. A., “Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 2004, 7(4): 333353.
7 Haidt, J., McCauley, C., and Rozin, P., “Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors,” Personality and Individual Differences , 1994, 16(5): 701713.
8 Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., and Griskevicius, V., “Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2009, 97(1): 103122.
9 Duncan, L. A., Schaller, M., and Park, J. H., “Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument,” Personality and Individual Differences , 2009, 47(6): 541546.
10 Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A., “Most people are not WEIRD,” Nature , 2010, 466(7302): 29.
11 Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., Barclay, P., Barlow, F. K., De Barra, M., and Becker, D. V. et al. , “Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 2016, 113(44): 1240812413.
12 Pettigrew, T. F., “Intergroup contact theory,” Annual Review of Psychology , 1998, 49(1): 6585.
13 Hainmueller, J. and Hopkins, D. J., “The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants,” American Journal of Political Science , 2015, 59(3): 529548.
14 Black, F. L., “Infectious diseases in primitive societies,” Science , 1975, 187(4176): 515518.
15 De Barra, M. and Curtis, V., “Are the pathogens of out-groups really more dangerous? Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 2012, 35(2): 8586.
16 van Leeuwen, F. and Petersen, M. B., “The behavioral immune system is designed to avoid infected individuals, not outgroups,” Evolution and Human Behavior , 2018, 39(2): 226234.
17 Hendry, D., Osmundsen, M., Laustsen, L., Aarøe, L., and Petersen, M. B., “Public opinion and the psychology of threats: A dual-process theory,” working paper, 2018.
18 Petersen, M. B., “Healthy out-group members are represented psychologically as infected in-group members,” Psychological Science , 2017, 28(12): 18571863.
19 Fessler, D. M. and Navarrete, C. D., “Meat is good to taboo: Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes,” Journal of Cognition and Culture , 2003, 3(1): 140.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

How and why disgust responses underlie prejudice: Evidence from the field

  • Michael Bang Petersen (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.