Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Within-Party Sex Gaps in Expenditure Preferences among Flemish Local Politicians

  • Caroline Slegten (a1) and Bruno Heyndels (a1)

Abstract

The sex gap in politics is widely documented: women tend to support left-wing parties more than men do. Evidence of this observation was recently supplemented by the identification of a within-party sex gap: within parties, female voters and politicians tend to take more left-wing positions. While this research typically limits itself to one policy area or one political party, we provide more broad-based evidence of within-party sex gaps among Flemish local politicians by covering a broad set of policy domains and six political parties. Our focus is on expenditure preferences. Analyzing stated preferences of 1,055 council members, we find that—across parties—female politicians have more leftist preferences than their male colleagues in six out of eight policy domains. Crucially, sex differences also occur within parties. We identify significant within-party sex gaps in four out of eight policy domains. Female representatives express preferences that are more left wing than their male colleagues with respect to public spending on crime, culture, and welfare. For environmental spending, they take a more right-wing position.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Within-Party Sex Gaps in Expenditure Preferences among Flemish Local Politicians
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Within-Party Sex Gaps in Expenditure Preferences among Flemish Local Politicians
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Within-Party Sex Gaps in Expenditure Preferences among Flemish Local Politicians
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All

We would like to thank Benny Geys for valuable comments on earlier versions of this article and Reiner Eichenberger and other participants at the Annual European Public Choice Society meeting of 2018 for helpful comments.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alvarez, R. Michael, and McCaffery, Edward J.. 2003. “Are There Sex Differences in Fiscal Political Preferences?Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 517.
Ashworth, John, and Heyndels, Bruno. 1997. “Politicians’ Preferences on Local Tax Rates: an Empirical Analysis.” European Journal of Political Economy 13 (3): 479502.
Ashworth, John, and Heyndels, Bruno. 2000. “Politicians’ Opinions on Tax Reform.” Public Choice 103 (1–2): 117–38.
Boles, Janet K., and Scheurer, Katherine. 2007. “Beyond Women, Children, and Families: Gender, Representation, and Public Funding for the Arts.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 3950.
Brooks, Clem, and Svallfors, Stefan. 2010. “Why Does Class Matter? Policy Attitudes, Mechanisms, and the Case of the Nordic Countries.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 28 (2): 199213.
Campbell, Rosie, and Childs, Sarah. 2014. “Representing Women's Interests and the UK Conservative Party: ‘To the Left, to the Right,’ Party Members, Voters and Representatives.” In Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation, eds. Celis, Karen and Childs, Sarah. Colchester: ECPR Press, 251–72.
Campbell, Rosie, and Childs, Sarah. 2015. “‘To the Left, to the Right’: Representing Conservative Women's Interests.” Party Politics 21 (4): 626–37.
Celis, Karen, Roggemans, Lilith, and Spruyt, Bram. 2014. “Girls on the Left, Boys on the Right? Genderverschillen in feministische attitudes bij 18- tot 30-jarige Vlaamse kiezers” [Gender differences in feminist attitudes of 18- to 30-year-old Flemish voters]. In Gender(en): Over de culturele constructie en deconstructie van gender bij Vlaamse jongeren [Gendering: On the cultural construction and deconstruction of gender among Flemish youth], eds. Spruyt, Bram and Siongers, Jessy. Leuven: Acco, 261–78.
Chaney, Carole Kennedy, Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (2): 311–39.
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–43.
Childs, Sarah, and Webb, Paul. 2012. Sex, Gender and the Conservative Parliamentary Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dancey, Logan, and Sheagley, Geoffrey. 2013. “Heuristics Behaving Badly: Party Cues and Voter Knowledge.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 312–25.
Deschouwer, Kris, Verthé, Tom, and Rihoux, Benoît. 2013. Op zoek naar de kiezers: Lokale partijafdelingen en de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012 [Looking for voters: local parties (and party factions) and the October 2012 municipal elections]. Brussels: Academic & Scientific Publishers.
Dolan, Julie. 2000. “The Senior Executive Service: Gender, Attitudes, and Representative Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (3): 513–29.
Dolan, Julie. 2002. “Representative Bureaucracy in the Federal Executive: Gender and Spending Priorities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (3): 353–75.
Edlund, Lena, and Pande, Rohini. 2002. “Why Have Women Become Left-Wing? The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in Marriage.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (3): 917–61.
Finseraas, Hennig, Jakobsson, Niklas, and Kotsadam, Andreas. 2012. “The Gender Gap in Political Preferences: An Empirical Test of a Political Economy Explanation.” Social Politics 19 (2): 199242.
Fredriksson, Per G., and Wang, Le. 2011. “Sex and Environmental Policy in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Economics Letters 113 (3): 228–30.
Fulton, Sarah A., and Ondercin, Heather. 2013. “Does Sex Encourage Commitment? The Impact of Candidate Choices on the Time-to-Decision.” Political Behavior 35 (4): 665–86.
Funk, Patricia, and Gathmann, Christina. 2015. “Gender Gaps in Policy Making: Evidence from Direct Democracy in Switzerland.” Economic Policy 30 (81): 141–81.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nadeau, Richard, and Nevitte, Neil. 2003. “Women to the Left? Gender Difference is Political Beliefs and Policy Preferences.” In Women and Electoral Politics in Canada, eds. Tremblay, Manon and Trimble, Linda. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 140–59.
Howell, Susan E., and Day, Christine L.. 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–74.
Leal, David L. 2005. “American Public Opinion toward the Military: Differences by Race, Gender, and Class?Armed Forces & Society 32 (1): 123–38.
Manza, Jeff, and Brooks, Clem. 1998. “The Gender Gap in U.S. Presidential Elections: When? Why? Implications?American Journal of Sociology 103 (5): 1235–66.
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895918.
McEvoy, Caroline. 2016. “Does the Descriptive Representation of Women Matter? A Comparison of Gendered Differences in Political Attitudes between Voters and Representatives in the European Parliament.” Politics & Gender 12 (4): 754–80.
Poggione, Sarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Burns, Nancy, Verba, Sidney, and Donahue, Jesse. 1995. “Gender and Citizen Participation: Is There a Different Voice?American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 267–93.
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4261.
Stucky, Thomas D., Miller, Geralyn M., and Murphy, Linda M.. 2008. “Gender, Guns, and Legislating: An Analysis of State Legislative Policy Preferences.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 29 (4): 477–95.
Stadelmann, David, Portmann, Marco, and Eichenberger, Reiner. 2014. “Politicians and Preferences of the Voter Majority: Does Gender Matter?Economics & Politics 26 (3): 355–79.
Svaleryd, Helena. 2009. “Women's Representation and Public Spending.” European Journal of Political Economy 25 (2): 186–98.
Svallfors, Stefan. 2011. “A Bedrock of Support? Trends in Welfare State Attitudes in Sweden, 1981–2010.” Social Policy & Administration 45 (7): 806–25.
Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.
Thomas, Sue, and Welch, Susan. 1991. “The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 445–56.
Vega, Arturo, and Firestone, Juanita M.. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 213–22.
Webb, Paul, and Childs, Sarah. 2012. “Gender Politics and Conservatism: The View from the British Conservative Party Grassroots.” Government and Opposition 47 (1): 2248.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Slegten and Heyndels supplementary material
Tables A-H

 Word (41 KB)
41 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed