Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:47:09.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stuck in the Basement: A Pathway Case Analysis of Female Recruitment in Hungary's 2010 National Assembly Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2016

Kathleen A. Montgomery  and
Gabriella Ilonszki
Kathleen A. Montgomery
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University
Gabriella Ilonszki
Affiliation:
Corvinus University of Budapest
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Women's legislative underrepresentation has emerged as perhaps the most stable feature of the postcommunist Hungarian political system, resisting Europeanization, changes in the electoral and party systems, and a new constitution. Early research on the decline in women's access to power in postcommunist transitional democracies focused on common legacies of communist rule, but those legacies cannot account for widening disparities in women's representation across the region over time or the persistent underrepresentation of women in Hungary. Using a pathway case analysis of Hungary's 2010 parliamentary elections, this research examines how cultural, structural, and institutional factors interacted to keep Hungary stuck in the basement with respect to women's legislative recruitment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 700 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, Ryan, de Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica, Hooghe, Liesbet, Jolly, Seth, Marks, Gary, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, Marco, and Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2012. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010.” Party Politics 21 (1): 143–52.Google Scholar
Bíró-Nagy, András, and Róna, Dániel. 2012. “Rational Radicalism: Jobbik's Road to the Hungarian Parliament, 2003–2010.” In Alternative Politics? The Rise of New Parties in Central Europe, eds. Mesežnikov, Grigorij, Gyárfášová, Olga, and Bútorová, Zora. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, 149–85.Google Scholar
Cabada, Ladislav, Hloušek, Vít, and Jurek, Petr. 2014. Party Systems in East Central Europe. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–98.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2012. “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?” Political Studies 60 (1): 213–25.Google Scholar
Cheng, Christine, and Tavits, Margit. 2011. “Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 460–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiantera-Stutte, Patricia, and Pető, Andrea. 2003. “Cultures of Populism and the Political Right in Central Europe.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 5 (4): 1–10.Google Scholar
Chiva, Cristina. 2005. “Women in Post-Communist Politics: Explaining Under-Representation in the Hungarian and Romanian Parliaments.” Europe-Asia Studies 57 (7): 969–94.Google Scholar
Csipke, Zoltán. 2009. “Women Remain Window Dressing in Hungary's Largest Political Parties.” December 15. http://www.politics.hu/20091215/women-remain-window-dressing-in-hungarys-largest-political-parties/ (accessed March 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Egedy, Gergely. 2009. “Political Conservatism in Post-Communist Hungary.” Problems of Post-Communism 56 (3): 42–53.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Barbara. 1993. Cinderella Goes to Market: Gender, Citizenship, and Women's Movements in East Central Europe. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Fábián, Katalin. 2007. “Making an Appearance: The Formation of Women's Groups in Hungary.” Aspasia 2007 (1): 103–27.Google Scholar
Fodor, Éva. 2011. “The Policy on Gender Equality in Hungary.” Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2005. Women and Politics in Chile. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Nanette, and Mueller, Magda. 1993. Gender Politics and Post-Communism: Reflections from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2004. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 341–54.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. “Is There a (Viable) Crucial Case Method?” Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2008. “The Impact of Early Party Consolidation on Female Representation and the Mixed Electoral System in Hungary.” In Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas, ed. Tremblay, Manon. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 205–18.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2012. “The Impact of Party System Change on Female Representation and the Mixed Electoral System.” In Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas, 2nd ed., ed. Tremblay, Manon. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 211–24.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2014. “How to Be the Last? Contextual Explanations behind Women Candidates’ Unfavourable Positions in a Mixed Member Electoral System: The Case of Hungary.” Presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Salamanca, Spain.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella, and Montgomery, Kathleen. 2002. “Több demokrácia kevesebb képviselet? Nők a Magyar politikában.” Politikatudományi Szemle 11 (3/4): 7–34.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2009. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (1): 56–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karácsony, Gergely, and Róna, Dániel. 2011. “The Secret of Jobbik: Reason's Behind the Rise of the Hungarian Radical Right.” Journal of East-European and Asian Studies 2 (1): 61–93.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010a. “Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010b. “Women's Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Political Studies 58 (5): 886–908.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Norris, Pippa. 2014. “Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office.” Political Studies 62 (1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtán, Sándor, and Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2011. “ Fraktionsprofile nach den Wahlen 2010 in Ungarn.” Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen 42 (1): 147–65.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Montgomery, Kathleen A.. 2003. “Recruiting Women to National Legislatures: A General Framework with Applications to Post-Communist Democracies.” In Women's Access to Power in Post-Communist Europe, eds. Matland, Richard E. and Montgomery, Kathleen A.. New York: Oxford University Press, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medve-Bálint, Gergö. 2011. “Towards a New One-Party System? Hungary 20 Years after the Change of Regime.” In Visegrad Elections 2010: Domestic Impact and European Consequences, eds. Gyárfášová, Olga and Mesežnikov, Grigorij. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, 33–58.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2002. “The Radical Right in Post-Socialist Central and Eastern Europe: Comparative Observations and Interpretations.” East European Politics and Societies 16 (2): 335–62.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Kathleen A. 2003. “Introduction.” In Women's Access to Power in Post-Communist Europe, eds. Matland, Richard E. and Montgomery, Kathleen A.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Kathleen A., and Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2003. “Weak Mobilization, Hidden Majoritarianism, and Resurgence of the Right: A Recipe for Female Under-Representation in Hungary.” In Women's Access to Power in Post-Communist Europe, eds. Matland, Richard E. and Montgomery, Kathleen A.. New York: Oxford University Press, 105–29.Google Scholar
Moser, Robert G. 2001. “The Effects of Electoral Systems on Women's Representation in Post-Communist States.” Electoral Studies 20 (3): 353–69.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow, Krook, Mona Lena, and Opello, Katherine A. R.. 2012. “Why Are Gender Quotas Adopted? Party Pragmatism and Parity in France.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 529–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women & Politics 19 (2): 57–80.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Opello, Katherine A. R. 2006. Gender Quotas, Parity Reform, and Political Parties in France. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Papp, Zsófia. 2008. “A nemek esélyegyenlőségének problémája, ahogy a képviselők látják.” In A női kvóta Magyarországon. A 2007-es év vitája a politikai esélyegyenlőségről, ed. Ilonszki, Gabriella. Budapest: Szociális és Munkügyi Minisztérium, 51–78.Google Scholar
Pető, Andrea. 2010. “Anti-Modernist Political Thoughts on Motherhood in Europe in a Historical Perspective.” In Reframing Demographic Change in Europe: Perspectives on Gender and Welfare State Transformations, eds. Kahlert, Heike and Ernst, Waltraud. Berlin: LIT Verlag, 189–201.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2012. “Representation and Inclusion.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 512–18.Google Scholar
Ramet, Sabrina P. 1999. “Defining the Radical Right: Values and Behaviors of Organized Intolerance.” In The Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe since 1989, ed. Ramet, Sabrina P.. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 3–27.Google Scholar
Rippeyoung, Phyllis. 2007. “When Women Are Right: The Influence of Gender, Work, and Values on European Far-Right Party Support.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 9 (3): 379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Várnagy, Réka. 2013. Women's Representation in the Hungarian Parliament. Vienna: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. http://www.osce.org/odihr/117575 (accessed March 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Várnagy, Réka, and Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2012. “Üvegplafonok, Pártok fent és lent.” Politikatudományi Szemle 22 (4): 7–28.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Montgomery and Ilonszki supplementary material

Online abstract

Download Montgomery and Ilonszki supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB