Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:53:30.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feminist Security Studies and Feminist International Political Economy: Considering Feminist Stories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Katherine Allison*
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow

Extract

In reflecting upon the divergence of Feminist Political Economy (FPE) and Feminist Security Studies (FSS) one feels puzzled and perhaps even a little embarrassed. How could such a schism occur and be sustained for seemingly so long? This divergence certainly did not appear to characterize the founding of feminist International Relations (IR) when scholars such as Cynthia Enloe (1983, 1989) and Ann Tickner (1992) were attentive to both dimensions and carefully connected issues of gender to the global economy and to understandings of security and militarism. Moreover, to my mind, there is no immediate epistemological or ontological schism between FSS and FPE of the sort that has characterized other feminist divides. The security studies/International Political Economy (IPE) split seems to be more one of empirical focus that does not require a painstaking and perhaps ultimately futile attempt to suture the feminist IR body back together. Indeed, recent and highly illuminating work on the connections between gender violence and global and local political economies (Meger 2014; True 2012a) would suggest no reason why we should not simply press ahead with the task of reconnection and driving feminist IR forward to new and insightful places.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Confortini, Catia C. 2011. “Doing Feminist Peace.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 13 (3): 349–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 2010. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women's Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1983. “Women textile workers in the militarization of Southeast Asia” in Nash, J. and Femández-Kelly, M.P. (Albany: University of New York Press) pp. 407–25.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feministense of International Politics. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2009. “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History.” New Left Review 56, 97-117.Google Scholar
Hemmings, Claire. 2011. Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John, and Seabrooke, Leonard. 2007. Everyday Politics of the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Lee, and Lister, Michael. 2013. “Vernacular Securities and Their Study: A Qualitative Analysis and Research Agenda.” International Relations 27 (2): 158–79.Google Scholar
Liddington, Jill. 1991. The Road to Greenham Common: Feminism and Anti-Militarism in Britain Since 1820. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Meger, Sara. 2014. “Toward a Feminist Political Economy of Wartime Sexual Violence: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo.” International Feminist Journal of Politics. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616742.2014.941253#.VTEYxnnD_6A (accessed April 17, 2015).Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2012a. The Political Economy of Violence Against Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2012b. “Securitizing Feminism or Feminist Security Studies?International Studies Review 14 (1): 193–95.Google Scholar