Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys

  • René Lindstädt (a1), Sven-Oliver Proksch (a2) and Jonathan B. Slapin (a3)

Abstract

Political scientists use expert surveys to assess the latent features of political actors. Experts, though, are unlikely to be equally informed and assess all actors equally well. The literature acknowledges variance in measurement quality but pays little attention to the implications of uncertainty for aggregating responses. We discuss the nature of the measurement problem in expert surveys. We then propose methods to assess the ability of experts to judge where actors stand and to aggregate expert responses. We examine the effects of aggregation for a prominent survey in the literature on party politics and EU integration. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we demonstrate that it is better to aggregate expert responses using the median or modal response, rather than the mean.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: jslapin@essex.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Adams, James, Ezrow, LawrenceSomer-Topcu, Zeynep (2014) Do Voters Respond to Party Manifestos or to a Wider Information Environment? An Analysis of Mass-Elite Linkages on European Integration. American Journal of Political Science 58(4), 967978.
Aldrich, John HMcKelvey, Richard D (1977) A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections. American Political Science Review 71(01), 111130.
Bakker, Ryan, Vries, Catherine de, Edwards, Erica, Hoogh, Liesbet, Jolly, Seth, Marks, Gary, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, MarcoVachudova, Milada Anna (2015) Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999-2010. Party Politics 21(1), 143152.
Bakker, Ryan, Edwards, Erica, Jolly, Seth, Polk, Jonathan, Rovny, JanSteenbergen, Marco (2014) Anchoring the Experts: Using Vignettes to Compare Party Ideology Across Countries. Research & Politics 1(3), 2053168014553502.
Benoit, KennethLaver, Michael (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bertens, LCM, Broekhuizen, BDL, Naaktgeboren, CA, Rutten, FH, Hoes, AWvan Mourik, Y (2013) Use of Expert Panels to Define the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Research: A Systematic Review of Published Methods and Reporting. PLoS Med 10(10), e1001531.
Blackwell, Matthew, Honaker, JamesKing, Gary (2015) A Unified Approach to Measurement Error and Missing Data: Overview and Applications. Sociological Methods and Research doi: 10.1177/0049124115589052.
Clinton, Joshua DLewis, David E (2008) Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences. Political Analysis 16(1), 320.
Druckman, James NWarwick, Paul V (2005) The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research 44(1), 1742.
Finn, RH (1970) A Note on Estimating the Reliability of Categorical Data. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30, 7176.
Gray, JuliaSlapin, Jonathan B (2012) How Effective Are Preferential Trade Agreements? Ask the Experts. The Review of International Organizations 7(3), 309333.
Hare, Christopher, Armstrong, David, Bakker, Ryan, Carroll, RoycePoole, Keith T (2015) Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens’ Ideological Preferences and Perceptions. American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 759774.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Bakker, Ryan, Brigevich, Anna, Vries, Catherine De, Edwards, Erica, Marks, Gary, Rovny, Jan, Steenbergen, MarcoVachudova, Milada (2010) Reliability and Validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill Expert Surveys on Party Positioning. European Journal of Political Research 49(5), 687703.
James, Lawrence R, Demaree, Robert GWolf, Gerrit (1984) Assessing Within-Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69(1), 8598.
Kozlowski, Steve WJHattrup, Keith (1992) A Disagreement About Within-Group Agreement: Disentangling Issues of Consistency Versus Consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(2), 161167.
LeBreton, James MSenter, Jenell L (2008) Answers to 20 Questions about Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement. Organizational Research Methods 11(4), 815852.
Martinez i Coma, FerranHam, Carolien (2015) Can Experts Judge Elections? Testing the Validity of Expert Judgments for Measuring Election Integrity. European Journal of Political Research 54(2), 305325.
Norris, Pippa, Frank, Richard WMartinez i Coma, Ferran (2013) Assessing the Quality of Elections. Journal of Democracy 24(4), 124135.
Proksch, Sven-OliverLo, James (2012) Reflections on the European Integration Dimension. European Union Politics 13(2), 317333.
van der Eijk, Cees (2001) Measuring Agreement in Ordered Rating Scales. Quality and Quantity 35(3), 325341.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Lindstädt et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (217 KB)
217 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Lindstädt et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys

  • René Lindstädt (a1), Sven-Oliver Proksch (a2) and Jonathan B. Slapin (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.