Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T07:16:08.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inflated Expectations: How Government Partisanship Shapes Monetary Policy Bureaucrats’ Inflation Forecasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2014

Abstract

Governments’ party identifications can indicate the types of economic policies they are likely to pursue. A common rule of thumb is that left-party governments are expected to pursue policies for lower unemployment, but which may cause inflation. Right-party governments are expected to pursue lower inflation policies. How do these expectations shape the inflation forecasts of monetary policy bureaucrats? If there is a mismatch between the policies, bureaucrats expect governments to implement, and those that they actually do, forecasts will be systematically biased. Using US Federal Reserve Staff’s forecasts we test for executive partisan biases. We find that irrespective of actual policy and economic conditions forecasters systematically overestimate future inflation during left-party presidencies and underestimate future inflation during right-party ones. Our findings suggest that partisan heuristics play an important part in monetary policy bureaucrats’ inflation expectations.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Christopher Gandrud is a Post-Doctoral Fellow in the Hertie School of Governance, Friedrichstraße 180. 10117, Berlin (gandrud@hertie-school.org). Cassandra Grafström is a PhD candidate in the University of Michigan, 5700 Haven Hall, 505 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1045 (cgrafstr@umich.edu). The authors thank Mark Hallerberg and the Fiscal Governance Centre at the Hertie School of Governance for comments and support. The authors also thank Leonardo Baccini, Vincent Arel-Bundock, Mark Kayser, Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, Tom Stark, and seminar participants at the Hertie School of Governance, London School of Economics, and Yonsei University as well as two anonymous reviewers. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.34

References

Adolph, Christopher. 2013. Bankers Bureaucrats and Central Bank Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1987. ‘Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:651678.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1991. ‘Evaluating Rational Partisan Theory: A Response’. Economics and Politics 3:6371.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Roubini, Nourel, and Cohen, Gerald D.. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. ‘Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election’. American Journal of Political Science 42:13491363.Google Scholar
Bartels, Andrew H. 1985. ‘Volker’s Revolution at the Fed’. Challenge 28(4):3542.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1987. ‘Elections and the Fed: Is There a Political Monetary Cycle?American Journal of Political Science 31:194216.Google Scholar
Berlemann, Michael, and Elzemann, Jörg. 2006. ‘Are Expectations on inflation and Election Outcomes Connected? An Empirical Analysis’. Economics Letters 91(3):354359.Google Scholar
Bloom, Howard S., and Douglas Price, H.. 1975. ‘Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession’. American Political Science Review 69:12401254.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’. Political Analysis 14(1):6382.Google Scholar
Brayton, Flint, Levin, Andrew, Tyron, Ralph, and Williams, John C.. 1997. ‘The Evolution of Macro Models at the Federal Reserve Board’. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 47:4381.Google Scholar
Brück, Tilman, and Stephan, Andreas. 2006. ‘Do Eurozone Countries Cheat with their Budget Deficit Forecasts?Kyklos 59(1):315.Google Scholar
Capistrán, Carlos. 2008. ‘Bias in Federal Reserve Inflation Forecasts: Is the Federal Reserve Irrational or Just Cautious?Journal of Monetary Economics 55(8):14151427.Google Scholar
Chappell, Henry W. Jr., and Keech, William R.. 1986. ‘Party Differences in Macroeconomic Policy Outcomes’. The American Economic Review 76:7174.Google Scholar
Clark, William, and Arel-Bundock, Vincent. 2013. ‘Independent, but Indifferent Partisan Bias in Monetary Policy at the Fed’. Economics and Politics 25(1):126.Google Scholar
Crawford, Vincent P., and Sobel, Joel. 1982. ‘Strategic Information Transmission’. Econometrica 50(6):14311451.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, Webb, Steven B., and Neyapti, Bilin. 1992. ‘Measuring the Independence of Central Banks and its Effects on Policy Outcomes’. The World Bank Economic Review 4:353398.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., Palmer, Harvey D., and Anderson, Christopher J.. 2000. ‘Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions’. American Journal of Political Science 44(4):635652.Google Scholar
Faust, Jon, and Wright, Jonathan H.. 2007. ‘Comparing Greenbook and Reduced Form Forecasts Using a Large Realtime Dataset’. NBER Working Paper Series No. 13397, Cambridge, MA, 1–51, NBER.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2006. ‘Elections and Markets: The Effect of Partisanship, Policy Risk, and Electoral Margins on the Economy’. Journal of International Money and Finance 68(1):89103.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. Jr. 2002. ‘Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes’. Annual Review of Political Science 5:369421.Google Scholar
Frendreis, John, and Tatalovich, Raymond. 2000. ‘Accuracy and Bias in Macroeconomic Forecasting by the Administration, the CBO, and the Federal Reserve Board’. Polity 32(4):623632.Google Scholar
Gamber, Edward N., and Smith, Julie K.. 2009. ‘Are the Fed’s Inflation Forecasts Still Superior to the Private Sector’s?Journal of Macroeconomics 31(2):240251.Google Scholar
Gandrud, Christopher. forthcoming. ‘simPH: An R Package for Illustrating Estimates from Cox Proportional Hazard Models Including for Interactive and Nonlinear Effects’. Journal of Statistical Software.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. ‘Why are American Presidential Campaign Polls so Variable when Voters are so Predictable?British Journal of Political Science 23:409451.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Charles A. E. 2001. ‘The Inflation Forecast’. National Institute Economic Review 175(1):5966.Google Scholar
Goodman, John B. 1991. ‘The Politics of Central Bank Independence’. Comparative Politics 23:329349.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Ben, and Lu, Ying. 2007. ‘normal.bayes: Bayesian Normal Linear Regression’. Accessed June 2012 from http://gking. harvard. edu/zelig Google Scholar
Grauwe, Paul. 2011. ‘Animal Spirits and Monetary Policy’. Economic Theory 47(2–3):423457.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia. 2013. The Company States Keep: International Economic Organization and Sovereign Risk in Emerging Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grier, Kevin B. 1987. ‘Presidential Elections and Federal Reserve Policy: An Empirical Test’. Southern Economic Journal 54:475486.Google Scholar
Hakes, David R. 1988. ‘Monetary Policy and Presidential Elections: A Nonpartisan Cycle’. Public Choice 57:175182.Google Scholar
Havrilesky, Thomas, and Gildea, John. 1995. ‘The Biases of Federal Reserve Bank Presidents’. Economic Inquiry 33:274284.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr. 1977. ‘Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy’. The American Political Science Review 71(4):14671487.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. Jr.. 1987. The American Political Economy: Macroeconomics and Electoral Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1994. ‘The Partisan Model of Macroeconomic Cycles: More Theory and Evidence for the United States’. Economics and Politics 6:123.Google Scholar
Hsiang, Solomon M. 2013. Visually-Weighted Regression. Accessed November 2014 from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2265501 Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. ‘Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics’. The American Economic Review 93(5):14491475.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1973. ‘On the Psychology of Prediction’. Psychological Review 80:237251.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Frederick, Shane. 2002. ‘Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment’. In Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin and Daniel Kahneman (eds) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Thought, 4981. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karamouzis, Nicholas, and Lombra, Raymond. 1989. ‘Federal Reserve Policymaking: An Overview of the Policy Process’. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 30:762.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. ‘Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation’. American Journal of Political Science 44(2):347361.Google Scholar
Knotek, Edward S. II. 2007. ‘How Useful is Okun’s Law?Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Fourth Quarter 73103.Google Scholar
Krause, George A. 2000. ‘Partisan and Ideological Sources of Fiscal Deficits in the United States’. American Journal of Political Science 44(3):541559.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western European Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Matt, Owen, Kosuke, Imai, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. 2013. Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. R package version 4.2-1. Accessed November 2014 from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Zelig Google Scholar
MacRae, C. Duncan. 1977. ‘A Political Model of the Business Cycle’. The Journal of Political Economy 85:239263.Google Scholar
McNees, Stephen K. 1990. ‘The Role of Judgment in Macroeconomic Forecasting Accuracy’. International Journal of Forecasting 6(3):287299.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Bumba, and Andrew Singer, David. 2008. ‘Monetary Institutions, Partisanship, and Inflation Targeting’. International Organization 62:323358.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. 1975. ‘The Political Business Cycle’. The Review of Economic Studies 42(2):169190.Google Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios, and Wieland, Volker. 2008. ‘Economic Projections and Rules of Thumb for Monetary Policy’. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 90(4):307324.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R., Benoit, William L., and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2003. ‘Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000’. Political Science Quarterly 118:599626.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’. American Journal of Political Science 37:391414.Google Scholar
Reifschneider, David L., Stockton, David J., and Wilcox, David W.. 1997. ‘Econometric Models and the Monetary Policy Process’. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 47:137.Google Scholar
Romer, Christina D., and Romer, David H.. 2000. ‘Federal Reserve Information and the Behavior of Interest Rates’. American Economic Review 90:429457.Google Scholar
Romer, Christina D., and Romer, David H.. 2008. ‘The FOMC Versus the Staff: Where can Monetary Policymakers Add Value?American Economic Review 98(2):230235.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1977. ‘Some Dilemmas of Economic Policy’. Challenge 20(1):2835.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2013. Deliberating American Monetary Policy: A Textual Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 1995. ‘The Politics of the Political Business Cycle’. British Journal of Political Science 25:79100.Google Scholar
Scott, James H. Jr., and Rothman, Mitchell P.. 1985. ‘The Effect of Introductory Economics Course on Student Political Attitudes’. The Journal of Economic Education 6:107112.Google Scholar
Sieg, Gernot. 1997. ‘A Model of Partisan Central Banks and Opportunistic Political Business Cycles’. European Journal of Political Economy 13:503516.Google Scholar
Snowberg, Erik, Wolfers, Justin, and Zitzewitz, Eric. 2007. ‘Partisan Impacts on the Economy: Evidence from Prediction Markets and Close Elections’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(2):807829.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1959. ‘The Politics of Political Economists’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 73:522532.Google Scholar
Svensson, Lars E. O. 2005. ‘Monetary Policy with Judgment: Forecast Targeting’. International Journal of Central Banking 1:154.Google Scholar
Tillmann, Peter. 2008. ‘The Conservative Central Banker Revisited: Too Conservative is More Costly Than Too Liberal’. European Journal of Political Economy 24:737741.Google Scholar
Tillmann, Peter. 2010. ‘The Fed’s Perceived Phillips Curve: Evidence from Individual FOMC Forecasts’. Journal of Macroeconomics 32(4):10081013.Google Scholar
Tootell, Geoffrey M. B. 1996. ‘Appointment Procedures and FOMC Voting Behavior’. Southern Economic Journal 63:191204.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1980. Political Control of the Economy. Cambridge, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. ‘Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’. Science 185(4157):11241131.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1983. ‘Existensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment’. Psychological Review 90(4):293315.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Gandrud and Grafström Datasets

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Gandrud and Grafström Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Gandrud and Grafström Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 680.2 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Gandrud and Grafström Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Gandrud and Grafström Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 680.2 KB